After WWII, Europe lay in ruins. The United States instituted the Marshall Plan where the US loaned massive amounts of money to European nations with the condition that goods and services be purchased from the United States. It was a great success; Europe was quickly able to rebuild its infrastructure and industry while US companies made fortunes supplying Europe’s needs. Because so many countries had so many US dollars, they ended up using them to purchase goods and services from other countries as well - including oil from the Middle East. In fact, two energy exchanges, the International Petroleum Exchange (IPE) in London, and the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) emerged as the only places to trade energy products and everything was priced in US dollars. In the 1970s, after the US made deal with Saudi Arabia, virtually the only currency you could use to purchase oil was the US dollar. This made the Greenback the dominant currency in the world, used for most (Western) trade and all energy purchases. This was a great deal for the United States - the value of the US dollar gained strength rapidly and they could afford to print huge sums of money without risk of devaluing their currency. Most of the newly printed money ended up offshore, in the vaults of central banks around the world that needed it for trade and energy.
Due to Free Trade, Globalization, and Reaganomics, American manufacturing fled to low-wage countries in search of higher profits. American output fell; unemployment rose, and the Federal government started borrowing madly to maintain spending levels; at the same time, their ability to pay shrank. America is now in a worse economic position than that of either Brazil or Korea when those countries’ economies melted down. The United States has an advantage that neither of those countries had though, massive amounts of their own currency sitting in other countries’ central banks collecting dust. America was able to borrow back its own currency from a multitude of countries that were happy to have their reserves earning interest instead of just laying around. This process of printing money for use outside the country and then having it come back as investments is known as “Recycling the Petro Dollar”.
Most of the world now realizes that the main reason for the USA to invade Iraq was to take its oil. What most governments, but few citizens, know, is that the rush to war was due to Saddam Hussain’s committing the high crime of accepting Euro dollars for oil under the “Oil for Food” program. While oil sales from Iraq were minimal due to UN sanctions, the act of defiance did not go unnoticed. Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea all started to dump portions of their US dollar reserves, and OPEC itself received European Union representatives who gave a presentation on the advantages of using the Euro currency for oil sales. The EU today is actually a larger market than the USA. It has more people and more money, and uses more oil than the United States. As OPECs largest single customer, it makes sense to use their currency. With Europe posing a major threat to the hegemony of the US Greenback, the USA decided it had to do something drastic to show OPEC that it would not allow a switch to the Euro. This is why; shortly after Iraq’s conversion to the Euro in late 2000, the USA used the excuse of 9/11 to invade Iraq - not to fight terrorism, but to perpetrate terror itself in order to keep OPEC in line. One can understand the reticence of Germany, France, and Russia when it came to invading Iraq, as switching to the Euro would have been a strategic economic victory.
In 2003, Iran began selling oil for Euros to a large number of Euro-dominated countries. The Euro was already making inroads as a replacement trade currency and this switch to the Euro for oil has played a large part in the US dollar’s declining value. As if this crime against the USA wasn’t enough, Iran also announced its intention to open its own Oil Bourse (exchange) in late 2005 (now delayed until spring 2006), competing with the two American owned exchanges, NYMEX and IPE. The last technical hurdle to the Euro taking over as both world trade and energy currency would be eliminated; the US dollar would likely go into freefall as central banks dumped their Greenbacks and bought Euros. The US has been working hard overtly, with its weapons of mass destruction smear campaign, as well as covertly, using its own cadre of terrorists, the M.E.K, to destabilize the Iranian government. The USA lacks the troops to invade and Dick Cheney has asked the Pentagon to draft a plan to use nuclear weapons against Iran. Assuming that Russia and China do not retaliate with a missile attack against the USA and its assets, using nuclear weapons against Iran could push the rest of the world to use its only real defense against the USA, dumping the Greenback and destroying the US economy. If the US does not attack, the oil bourse will open and the ultimate result will likely be the same: the end of the USA as a world power and the start of a new “Great Depression”.
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
---
Good government is not a party government
<br />
A loan huh? Does that mean we will be getting that money back one day? With interest? <br />
<br />
>> American output fell; unemployment rose,<<<<br />
<br />
Lets see some 3rd party statistics on that. <br />
<br />
>> Most of the world now realizes that the main reason for the USA to invade Iraq was to take its oil.<<<br />
<br />
Yeah, that is what you said about Afghanistan. If we had wanted to invade a country for oil there are ones closer, ones that want to break up anyway, ones that wouldn’t have anything other then a “phony polite insurgency”. <br />
<br />
>> With Europe posing a major threat to the hegemony of the US Greenback, the USA decided it had to do something drastic to show OPEC that it would not allow a switch to the Euro.<<<<br />
<br />
Did you ever use one of these? <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.xe.com/ucc/">http://www.xe.com/ucc/</a><br />
<br />
Or one of these? <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lehigh.edu/~jps3/.images/credit-card-white-bg.jpg">http://www.lehigh.edu/~jps3/.images/credit-card-white-bg.jpg</a><br />
<br />
Did you have to hold huge currency reserves in order to use that credit card? <br />
<br />
<br />
>> The last technical hurdle to the Euro taking over as both world trade and energy currency would be eliminated; the US dollar would likely go into freefall as central banks dumped their Greenbacks and bought Euros.<<<br />
<br />
LoL! Nothing of a leap of faith there. <br />
<br />
>> the end of the USA as a world power and the start of a new “Great Depression”.<<<<br />
<br />
Seems like you are rooting for that to happen. What do you think the result for Canada would be? Big time profit and happy days? <br />
AAAh yes, the never ending wish of the petty person. To straighten out the other guy. Straighten yourself out first.
>>. we all be living on the same page then.<<
No, we all will be lowered equaly. We will drop by x amount and you will drop by x amount. whatever difference between us would still be there, meaning you will be deeper in the gutter. That is just the start, Since we wont have any cash to buy the 85% of your exports you will heading even lower.
---
RickW
Then again the liberals will have all of our gins, so they think!!
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
After WW2 we had tons of money in Europe, no inflation in most countries,the industrial infrastructure was relatively little damaged, but we were starving because we had no resources to build with, except scraps and ruins. As a refugee, I lived in barracks and camp conditions for 5 out of 6 postwar years, 3 in Austria, 3 in England.
Although we were paid with worthless money, it was only good
for buying the small rations. The underground economy, the black market, was based on cigarettes. E.g. American cigarettes had double the value of domestic, or Turkish and so on. All values were expressed in smokes. 500 grams of butter 80 cigarettes, the same as a pair of old boots. A Leica camera 6 cartons of Lucky Strikes.
The lesson of this is that multinationals are fighting to buy Canada's resources so they can control them when the monetary crash comes and they can deny the right of Canadians to benefit from them. Those guys know exactly what's going on and are ready for it, while our stupid governments are dying to play along with their expropriation games.
Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.
<br />
<a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16416680%5E28737,00.html">http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16416680%5E28737,00.html</a>
///
You may recall that there was a pipeline issue with the Taleban. As far as invading the Canuckistanians, if you are in any way serious, it is one thing to shred and poison brown skinned untermenschen and quite another to try the same with fine white skinned christians. Your masters do know how to pick their victims.
Personally I am quite willing to live on roots and berries if it means bringing down your corrupt, cruel and bigotted empire-- supported by the most ignorant and self righteous people to be found anywhere.
I'm not sticking up for everything posted above, but this requires correction. All nations who consume petroleum do hold significant U.S. dollar reserves because that is the currency in which almost internationlly traded oil is priced and transacted. This is one of the factors which allows the U.S. to run a trade deficit that other countries would not survive long with. I'm not hacking on the U.S. here, it's a fact and grows no more or less true based on your opinion of the U.S. in general.
It is also true that several OPEC nations have flirted with the idea of pricing and selling oil in euro, Iraq being the only nation that actually did it, Iran being the only one with a serious project to do so (discounting Venezuela's various ad hoc trading projects).
It is also true that a decline in the neccessity of holding U.S. dollar reserves would be very bad for the North American economies (and others that enjoy the high value of the U.S. dollar). And no, not just the U.S. so it is foolish for Canadians to "root" for it. It is also foolish to not recognize and plan for it, or refuse to admit such planning is occurring. I'd almost guarantee that many of those patriotic, flag-waving (and thus highly cynical) multinationals currently enjoying this U.S. administration's global adventure are.
Further advice to the other anon, who gives the impression he is a patriot to the current U.S. administration, if not the U.S. in general: should you awaken in an unlit room and someone with whom you generally disagree tells you it is day, you do not automatically assume it is night. Open the door and look outside.
Now, the following is admittedly pure speculation, but worth consideration: of all the U.S. dollars (tax and otherwise) currently flowing out of the nation in this grand expression of patriotism and democratic export--to permanent, expatriate, non-dollar military assets, to finance multinational hard asset acquisitions in foreign lands (aka "reconstruction")--how much of this outflow ends up getting repatriated to the domestic economy? How much ends up in foreign assets that might just as easily show book value in other currencies?
If one accepts, as many economists and finaciers do (including such knee-jerk left wing conspiracy buffs as Warren Buffet and George Soros), that U.S. dollar stability is at risk due to various global structural factors such as strength of the euro and the Iranian oil bourse, then the true American patriot (and by proxy, Canadian patriot since we are heavily invested) owes it to themselves to find out where all this outflow involving these so-called patriotic multinationals is going, especially the billions that cannot be accounted for. My hypothesis is that if the risk is real, the most prudent route for a multinational would be to diversify one's balance sheet into as currency-neutral an asset base as possible, quietly so as not to spook the herd.
So, is this current outflow repatriating *as real domestic captial*, domestic hard assets and production capacity? (aside, like eurodollars did under the Marshall plan) If not--and again, this is pure speculation--a grand, cynical, deception is afoot, wave the flag or burn it all you like.
Not all Yanks are for the Bush admin. Many of the people I know DID NOT VOTE for this incompetent megalomaniac! How do we change things here...we've not even gone through our first year of his second term? It's pretty scary...we're under the control of a police state. It's the rich vs. poor (and the middle class is really getting the squeeze). I guess we need a French Revolution! Where is Madame Lafarge when we need her?