Conservative Party Linked To Pro-U.S. Annexation Cabal

Posted on Saturday, December 16 at 13:18 by Wraun
Mel Hurtig, a noted Canadian author and publisher who was the elected leader of the National Party of Canada, provided researchers with the agenda and attendee list of the so-called "North American Forum" at the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel in Banff, Alberta, Sept. 12-14, 2006.

Mel Hurtig reveals that the Stephen Harper's Government has appointed a Ministerial Team in order to "surrender" Canada to the U.S. by 2007, so that its political-military-industrial complex can fully control oil and other Canadian resources. Alberta "Conservatives", including at least one former Premier, are reportedly among prominent Harper Government operatives of this ultra-right wing effort.

Mr. Hurtig said the "secret meeting was designed to undermine the democratic process." In addition, the reported Agenda undermines the Statutory position of Her Majesty the Queen of Canada, as the constitutional expression of a Canada independent from the U.S.

keep reading.



Note: keep reading.

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by KWL
    Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:12 am
    It's not just the Conservatives who have been working to dismantle Canada but the Liberals were doing a pretty good job of it themselves when they were in power.

    It's time to pull the plug on this New Government of ours though, as soon as possible.

  2. by RPW
    Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:37 am
    It's the left-hand, and the right-hand thing. But in this case, the same puppet master pulls the strings.......

    ---
    "No kingdom could be ruled without lies - - for lies are the things we use to build our reputations."........
    King Arthur

  3. Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:11 am
    yup! And only a few get it, that won't stop us from sounsing the wake-up call

    ---
    When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.

    -Gary Lloyd

  4. by tess t
    Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:50 am
    It is treason. The same issue is dealt with on the Cold Eye a couple of days ago on the story of Harper allowing the US to set Canadian drug policy. http://www.coldeye.org/blog/index.php?itemid=85

  5. Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:06 am
    Activities tantamount* to Treason, involving Breach of Parliamentary Oath and conspiracy to overthrow Her Majesty<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=81321&dict=CALD">http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=81321&dict=CALD</a> <br />
    <br />
    *tantamount adjective SLIGHTLY FORMAL<br />
    tantamount to being almost the same or having the same effect as, usually something bad:<br />
    Her refusal to answer was tantamount to an admission of guilt.<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    From the link,<br />
    "What is sinister about this meeting is that it involved high level government officials and some of the top and most powerful business leaders of the three countries and the North American Forum in organizing the meeting intentionally did not inform the press in any of the three countries," he said. "It was clear that the intention was to keep this important meeting about integrating the three countries out of the public eye," Mr. Hurtig further indicates.&#8221;<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    KWL:<br />
    "It's not just the Conservatives who have been working to dismantle Canada but the Liberals were doing a pretty good job of it themselves when they were in power."<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    Uh KWL? Do you not get that Harper may very well preformed an act of treason and you&#8217;re blathering on about the Liberals?<br />
    Focus Man! <br />
    Focus!<br />
    <br />
    <p>---<br>When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.<br />
    <br />
    -Gary Lloyd

  6. Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:08 am
    I have always considered the Harpocrits to be Quislings, traitors to put in bluntly. And you know what happens to traitors! I have never understood why they were not attacked as traitors during elections. These criminals should not have a moments peace, we should drive them out to Gringo land where they belong.

  7. Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:02 pm
    "And you know what happens to traitors!"
    I know what used to happen to traitors, It seems that in the world of today, the Bush years particularly, that "traitor' ain't what it use't wuz.

    BC has an organised crime group at the helm of the ship of state and the response from the public is a blase'* yawn.
    The clarion call has be sounded, and nobody is listening except for those conveniently labelled &#8220;conspiracy nuts&#8221;


    *bla·sé (blä-z)
    adj.
    1. Uninterested because of frequent exposure or indulgence.
    2. Unconcerned; nonchalant: had a blasé attitude about housecleaning.
    3. Very sophisticated.

    Where is armyguy on this one?
    Will he and his kind be the first to "follow orders" and silence dissent?
    for those who support government decisions and speak of fighting for freedom in Afghanistan and Iraq pul a Lord Nelson and turn a blind eye at home?

    But Hey, it's ok because its a "choice"

    And where the hell are the queens cowboys on this?


    ---
    When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.

    -Gary Lloyd

  8. by KWL
    Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:43 pm
    Diogenes, I do understand that Harper may have committed an act of treason, however, I don't think I am blathering on about the Liberals. All I am saying is I don't think we should think that the Conservatives are the only ones who have had a had in helping to potentially dismantle this country.

    The Liberals let the DEA set up offices across Canada, they let a Canadian, Marc Emery, be arrested on Canadian soil at the request of the US and be potentially extradited to the US for something Canada won't prosecute him for. The Liberals have let countless business take overs by American corporations happen which are not in the best interests of Canada, but America. There is much more I could add but I have to go study for my last final here at UBC. So if I am blathering on here forgive me but if we are going to target Harper with Treason then should we not add Martin and Cretien?

  9. Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:46 am
    From : Henry Makow <hmakow@gmail.com><br />
    Sent : December 18, 2006 12:02:14 AM<br />
    To : "tell ya later s/a" <xxxxxxxxxxxx><br />
    Subject : Re:<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    I posted on my site <a href="http://www.savethemales.ca">www.savethemales.ca</a> and sent to rense<br />
    <br />
    H<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    On 12/17/06, tell ya later s/a <xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <br />
    <a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20061216061801872">http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20061216061801872</a><p>---<br>When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.<br />
    <br />
    -Gary Lloyd

  10. Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:06 am
    "...I don't think we should think that the Conservatives are the only ones who have had a had in helping to potentially dismantle this country."<br />
    Quite different than your initial comment, and those of us who do THINK, are hip, or is it hep?<br />
    <br />
    The point being that the electorate will stand in lines to 'elect' their keepers.<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    Herer is a clue on what to do.<br />
    <br />
    From, <br />
    <a href="http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/blackstone/bla-001.htm#fn0d">http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/blackstone/bla-001.htm#fn0d</a> <br />
    INTRODUCTION, SECTION 1<br />
    On The Study of The Law<br />
    <br />
    "Far be it from me to derogate from the study of the civil law, considered (apart from any binding authority) as a collection of written reason. No man is more thoroughly persuaded of the general excellence of its rules, and the usual equity of its decisions, nor is better convinced of its use as well as ornament to the scholar, the divine, the statesman, and even the common lawyer. But we must not carry our veneration so far as to sacrifice our Alfred and Edward to the manes of Theodosius and Justinian; we must not prefer the edict of the praetor, or the rescript of the Roman emperor, to our own immemorial customs or the sanctions of an English parliament; unless we can also prefer the despotic monarchy of Rome and Byzantium, for whose meridians the former were calculated, to the free constitution of Britain, which the latter are adapted to perpetuate. <br />
    <br />
    Without detracting therefore from the real merit which abounds in the imperial law, I hope I may have leave to assert, that if an Englishman must be ignorant of either the one or the other, he had better be a stronger to the Roman than the English institutions. For I think it an undeniable position, that a competent knowledge of the laws of that society in which we live, is the proper accomplishment of every gentleman and scholar; an highly useful, I had almost said essential, part of liberal and polite education. And in this I am warranted by the example of ancient Rome; where, as Cicero inform us,1 the very boys were obliged to learn the twelve tables by heart as a carmen necessarium, or indispensable lesson, to imprint on their tender minds an early knowledge of the laws and constitution of their country. <br />
    <br />
    But as the long and universal neglect of this study, with us in England, seems in some degree to call in question the truth of this evident position, it shall therefore be the business of this introductory discourse, in the first place to demonstrate the utility of some general acquaintance with the municipal law of the land, by pointing out its particular uses in all considerable situations of life. Some conjectures will then be offered with regard to the causes of neglecting this useful study; to which will be subjoined a few reflections on the peculiar propriety of reviving it in our own universities. <br />
    <br />
    And, first, to demonstrate the utility of some acquaintance with the laws of the land, let us only reflect a moment on the singular frame and polity of that land, which is governed by this system of laws. A land, perhaps the only one in the universe, in which political or civil liberty is the very end and scope of the constitution.2 This liberty, rightly understood consists in the power of doing whatever the laws permit;3 which is only to be effected by a general conformity of all orders and degrees to those equitable rules of action, by which the meanest individual is protected from the insults and oppression of the greatest. As therefore every subject is interested in the preservation of the laws, it is incumbent upon every man to be acquainted with those at least with which he is immediately concerned; lest he incur the censure, as well as inconvenience, of living in society without knowing the obligations which it lays him under. And thus much may suffice for persons of inferior condition, who have neither time nor capacity to enlarge their views beyond that contracted sphere in which they are appointed to move. But those on whom nature and fortune have bestowed more abilities and greater leisure, cannot be so easily excused. These advantages are given them, not for the benefit of themselves only, but also of the public; and yet they cannot, in any scene of life, discharge properly their duty either to the public or themselves, without some degree of knowledge in the laws. To evince this the more clearly, it may not be amiss to descend to a few particulars."<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <p>---<br>When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.<br />
    <br />
    -Gary Lloyd

  11. Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:12 am
    "I don't think I am blathering on about the Liberals."
    Of course you don't One of the most difficult tasks to perform is to acknowledge our faults.


    ---
    When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.

    -Gary Lloyd

  12. Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:07 am
    2171 Views!!!! now thats gotta be some traffic

    ---
    When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.

    -Gary Lloyd

  13. by Wraun
    Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:39 pm
    3097 now! Seems to be of interest maybe. So Dio, do we have a case against Harper and can "the people" launch any sort of an action - beyond a petition - against a sitting PM and his government or do we have to wait for his gov't to be replaced by another band of traitors and then ask politely for someone to do something?

    ---
    Everybody got to deviate from the norm

  14. Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:14 pm
    Wraun:
    &#8220;3097 now! Seems to be of interest maybe. So Dio, do we have a case against Harper and can "the people" launch any sort of an action - beyond a petition - against a sitting PM and his government or do we have to wait for his gov't to be replaced by another band of traitors and then ask politely for someone to do something?&#8221;


    Having Henry Makow post the article to Rense after I alerted him to it is most likely the responsible for the high traffic. My guess is the largest percentage of those numbers are Americans.
    That being the case eyes will be on Canadians to see if we have the fortitude to peruse legal action, something I have little faith will happen.
    Perhaps contacting the original author will give the story &#8216;legs&#8217;

    Best case scenario: Canadians will rally behind the demand for Harper and co. to be brought to trial for treason resulting in a domino effect south of the boarder.

    Most likely scenario: A collective yawn.
    The beer commercial, &#8220;I AM CANADIAN&#8221; aside the herd will maintain the grazing posture.
    Dio


    ---
    When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.

    -Gary Lloyd



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news