The Politics Of Trust

Posted on Tuesday, April 24 at 11:24 by Rural
A national Conservative Party might offer a credible alternative, if only it could unite its sparring factions. Musing about a solution, he invoked the concept of "creative destruction." Coined by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter, it describes the process whereby hungry new firms topple established giants. Conservative Party stalwarts insist that what the Canadian public is seeing is the "real" Stephen Harper and say the "hidden agenda" debate should be laid to rest. "Sometimes old structures do need to be demolished in order that new ones can be erected," the speaker told the Canadian Institute of Plumbing and Heating, a group more accustomed to discussing leaky faucets than federal politics. The speaker's name was Stephen Harper. Six years later, as prime minister, his speeches have no trouble finding a national audience. And in the next federal election, some voters will be wondering what creative destruction he would wreak on the country if granted a majority government. When he delivered his 2001 speech, Harper was president of the National Citizens' Coalition, a right-wing advocacy group that promotes an agenda of small government, free enterprise and conservative family values. Yet, in his first 15 months as prime minister, Harper has governed more like a cautious centrist: rolling out a big-spending budget aimed at middle-income families, reaching out to moderate Tories in his caucus, and appealing to "soft" nationalists in Quebec. The difference has been so stark, in fact, that former right-wing allies are accusing him of selling out to the political left. Complete artice at http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/index.cfm?sid=24579&sc=110 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 25, 2007]

Note: http://www.theguardian....

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Apr 25, 2007 5:37 am
    "The Liberal government, he argued, was soft, bloated
    and hopelessly ill-equipped to handle the challenges of
    the 21st century. It spoon-fed corporations, tolerated a
    weak dollar, stifled experimentation in private health
    care and perpetuated the fantasy of national unity by
    continually paying off Quebec."

    Hold on a moment - hasn't he done the same exact
    things he was bashing the Liberal Govt. for doing six
    years ago? It's a good thing most people have a short
    memory, otherwise, they may think he's a hypocrite.

  2. Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:20 am
    Yes but doesn't history show us that the Cons and Libs do exactly the same
    things when they are in gov and criticize the other when they are not. The
    agenda is the same, they just play their roles according to where they are
    standing on the stage, the audience has simply not caught on to the fact, yet!

    But this made me laugh...."Analysts agree on the pivotal question of the next
    election: 'Are Canadians ready to give this man a majority?'

    These analysts have spent time, and analyzed this so they can agree on the
    question. Wow this is provocative! Thanks for posting this article Rural, these
    are interesting times.

    ---
    "aaaah and the whisper of thousands of tiny voices became a mighty deafening roar and they called it 'freedom'!"' Canadians Acting Humanely at home & everywhere

  3. Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:19 am
    The deeper question, Catherine, is “ Why does the audience accept the play they pay for?”
    Didn’t anyone bring rotten tomatoes?
    Ya see in “this” play there is no on in the wings with the sheep crook to remove the “players.’ Play’ the audience
    Look! One doesn’t have to be particularly bright to catch the con game, I’m not and I do.
    We citizens become divided along god only know what lines that is why there are army guys, individualists, and assorted others who either buy into the states deceit or figure they to can rip and tear their way to the top like all those there now.
    Some where in my net wanderings I once came across documented, what I will call evidence, of American ship owners who were first drug runners then slavers whose families are now the establishment.

    Today we have the internet, my school, and with it I can find info like I’ve describes
    So how many years will it take until the audience catches on?



    ---
    "It is easy to dodge our responsibilities, but we cannot dodge the consequences of dodging our responsibilities."
    —Sir Josiah Stamp



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news