"We are hearing from members in all Atlantic provinces," said Stephane Robichaud of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business in an interview with a local newspaper. "Dairy farmers are having to throw away milk because they can't move it out; stores have no bread or milk left on their shelves because the supplies can't get in; gas stations are starting to run out of fuel in parts of Atlantic Canada, and countless businesses are being affected because of transportation disruptions."
Shoppers also told reporters they were angry. "I'm mad at the truckers because there's no bread, no vegetables, no nothing," said Louise Carrier, a grocery store customer in Moncton. "It's the population who are hostage right now."
Eric Bijeau, spokesman for the protesters, estimated that at one point as many as 1,000 trucks were been stopped in the northern New Brunswick blockade, a figure the police disputed. He said he hoped the protest spreads to other provinces and into the United States.
"We are being screwed by the refineries," Bijeau said.
Bijeau said the group he represents, the New Brunswick Northwest Truckers Association, sent a letter to Prime Minister Paul Martin asking that the federal government step in and stop profiteering by the major refineries. "We are asking you to intervene at the refiners' level, where it is clearly demonstrated that the refiners' profit margin has increased from .09 cents per litre to .43 cents per litre," the truckers stated in their letter. "The costs are too much. They are driving people out of business. We have to do something... This is a clear case of the rich gouging the poor."
The traffic stoppage affected only trucks- cars were able to use the highways as usual, although there were some slowdowns around the truck blockades.
As the economic impact of the protest mounted, Premiers of three Maritime provinces and Quebec held an emergency conference call to discuss the "paralysis" on the Trans-Canada Highway and called for an end to the truckers' protest. There was solidarity among government leaders that the blockades must be found to be illegal and dealt with quickly.
And so they were. After being advised that the truckers were in violation of a minor traffic regulation that carries a $168 fine, a grim-faced, angry New Brunswick Premier Bernard Lord saw his opportunity and announced on September 8 that the truckers' blockades had to come down by the end of the day and that the RCMP were authorized to use "whatever means necessary."
"The blockade is not acceptable and must end immediately," Lord told reporters during a break in a provincial Conservative caucus meeting in Alma, N.B. "The RCMP has the full support of the government to proceed forcefully. The RCMP have the mandate to enforce the law, and it's clear that the government has indicated to the RCMP, that we're fully supporting of their efforts to enforce the law," said Lord after the meeting.
The truckers ended the protest that day.
Now, as the realities of Peak Oil, the coming energy crisis and inevitable economic collapse become more and more obvious to all and are starting to seriously affect us here at home instead of just the poor, exploited people of other countries, the New Brunswick provincial government has clearly stated their position that they will tolerate absolutely no form of effective protest or civil disobedience and will use whatever means necessary (implying the possibility of the use of deadly force) to continue business as usual. Our politicians have said outright that they do not favor or support reducing the taxation on fuel, have no intent to do so and say they are powerless over the oil companies and world markets. Any assistance they have proposed, although well-intentionally aimed at low-income families, does not even begin to alleviate the current increases, let alone the inevitable future ones.
Because of Hurricane Katrina and the record fuel prices it helped create, the gloves are now off and the laws and policies the governments (both in the U.S. and Canada) have put in place since 9/11 under the guise of "the war on terrorism" and "national security" will be used to ensure that any effective protest or civil disobedience about any serious issue will be put down- by deadly force if all else fails. What has happened to the independent truckers in New Brunswick will also happen to any other group or organization that decides to make an effective stand. As we plunge further into the bleak future and economic chaos of Peak Oil, martial law will be the only way for the government to deal with the economic refugees that will be created. The politicians know this and have actually been preparing for it behind closed doors for many years now.
What is being played out on the highways of New Brunswick and in the "evacuee centers" of the American Gulf Coast after Katrina are simply practice sessions for when the trouble really starts. As more and more economic refugees are created by the effects of global warming or as people default on their mortgages, go into bankruptcy and lose everything they worked so hard for because they have to buy fuel to go to work and heat their homes, there will be an inevitable and righteous undercurrent of anger that is going to boil to the surface.
The government now wants you to know in no uncertain terms that they will not tolerate any crap from you if you have a problem with being broke, freezing and homeless and they will grasp at any straw and do anything they have to in order to maintain the status quo: Larger, growing profits for big business and larger, growing pressures on ordinary citizens to continue to provide them. Those truckers were not just protesting for themselves, they were protesting for us too. Now, Louise, exactly who's holding who hostage?
[Editor's note - I couldn't find any links for this story. If anyone has one, or if the anon who posted it wrote it, I'd apppreciate knowing that in the comments. Dr. C]
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 12, 2005]
We need to support those who are willing to speak up, even if we don't feel we can do it, at the very least don't complain that their protest is hurting you today, because tomorrow it will really hurt. People should have joined these truckers and sent a message not to remove the blockade but reduce the price of oil and gas. It seems easier to attack the little guy than for gov to take on the refineries, Canada should be insulated from world events, and not tied to it. This is ridiculous.
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
Coming from a logistics background, I can totally agree with the truckers regarding gas prices. However, I think their choice of protest was somewhat flawed. As your article stated:
""Dairy farmers are having to throw away milk because they can't move it out; stores have no bread or milk left on their shelves because the supplies can't get in; gas stations are starting to run out of fuel in parts of Atlantic Canada, and countless businesses are being affected because of transportation disruptions."
Shoppers also told reporters they were angry. "I'm mad at the truckers because there's no bread, no vegetables, no nothing," said Louise Carrier, a grocery store customer in Moncton. "It's the population who are hostage right now." "
Hurting the little guys is not the way to go. They need to find a better venue for airing their dispute. Farmers and consumers are also reeling from high fuel costs (not as much as independent truckers, and not as quickly, but they feel the pain as well). Blocking Parliament, blocking oil headquarters, and basically focusing on the actual enemy would be a better tactic. It may not get as much play in the media, but you wouldn't be alienating yourself.
The other point is that the law isn't quite as draconian as it seems. If truckers were even CHARGED with a crime it would disqualify them from crossing the border, something necessary in their work. So just the threat was enough, and the government knew it.
However the other issue mentioned is a relevant one, how do canadians join together when they are never together. Obviously canadians aren't THAT upset, however, it was maintained that 9 out of 10 drivers actually signed the petition. However, what exactly IS effective rebellion? Canadians not only will not join environmentalists or the homeless, in fact actively join against them.
The other point is that the law isn't quite as draconian as it seems. If truckers were even CHARGED with a crime it would disqualify them from crossing the border, something necessary in their work. So just the threat was enough, and the government knew it.
However the other issue mentioned is a relevant one, how do canadians join together when they are never together. Obviously canadians aren't THAT upset, however, it was maintained that 9 out of 10 drivers actually signed the petition. However, what exactly IS effective rebellion? Canadians not only will not join environmentalists or the homeless, in fact actively join against them.
This is why direct democracy is my preferred method of activism, if people have the information they will generally make very similar decisions, particularly when you get to the governmental level, meaning the detail level. On broad issues it seems people are very divisive, but when you actually get down to actual legislation you find people aren't nearly so far apart. I find this very often just in discussions online, when you actually talk specifics and not vague ideologies there are remarkable similarities. Canadians don't ACT, because there's no point to activism, they see no good can come from it and that there are risks to it. But canadians are as generous as anybody else, just watch the Terry Fox specials on now, or take a look at any natural disaster. I found a local book on the drought of several years ago out west where farmers from the east packed up as much hay as possible and trucked it out there.
However, when you have 'negative' media, portraying people as crooks and liars and cheats, then people in Canada will vote for tougher prison sentences as fast as any american. But when you get down to actual legislation and specific cases, it's usually a different story. Hope that's even more muddier.