Uranium Bombing In Iraq Contaminates Europe

Posted on Sunday, July 09 at 09:49 by Bob Nichols
Bush's radioactive "shock and awe" gas cloud descended on Britain and Europe like a warm, deadly ticking blanket and stayed throughout the American and British shock and awe bombing campaign in 2003. Bush's radioactive cloud lasted more than five weeks at high radioactive particle concentration levels. There is no gas mask filter fine enough to trap this radioactive gas and protect humans. At Aldermaston, England, where the data was collected and where the British Atomic Weapons Establishment, complete with air monitoring facilities, is located, the deadly uranium oxide gas measured about 48,000 radioactive particles per square meter. The average radioactive dose, according to official government index based calculations, was about 23 million radioactive particles for the average adult male in Britain and Europe. Yes, people breathed this poison gas, absolutely. People throughout England and presumably throughout Europe breathed in large quantities of this radioactive uranium poison gas. What are the effects of the poison gas cloud? After a steady decline for 41 years, the infant death rate has started inching up, many researchers think because of the Central Asian nuclear wars. The infant death rate is the most sensitive measure of the health of the human race. Like the proverbial canaries in a coal mine, the tiniest babies die first. George W. Bush, as the current appointed manager of the senior American political and military establishments, oversees a vast empire that knows exactly what the effect of millions of pounds of deadly weaponized radioactive ceramic uranium oxide gas and tiny aerosols are on the health of people throughout the world. They used uranium munitions in Iraq anyway. The American political and military leaders wanted to use genocidal weapons. You might even say the U.S. military went out of their way to use these radiation-based genocidal weapons in Iraq. Lots of them, too. Indeed, the American permanent war establishment has known the effect of poisonous uranium oxide gas since 1943. A declassified World War II memo to Gen. Leslie Groves, director of the ultra-secretive Manhattan Project to make atomic bombs, listed two reasons to use radioactive gas: One was to kill people, and the other was to contaminate their land. [3] A British newspaper quotes Dr. Busby, a government adviser on radiation, as saying: "This research shows that rather than remaining near the target, as claimed by the military, depleted uranium weapons contaminate both locals and whole populations hundreds to thousands of miles away." [4] There were and are laws in England that require notification of the government when levels of radioactivity are reached around the nuclear weapons complex at Aldermaston. No notification was made. When the records were requested, the clearly labeled "shock and awe" time frame data was omitted. The Defense Procurement Agency in Bristol supplied the missing data to scientists Busby and Morgan. The real British patriots are the ones who provided the deleted incriminating data to Busby and Morgan. Bush and his faithful followers, the neocon fascists, will be remembered as securing their place in history by exposing hundreds of millions of people to high levels of internal radiation poisoning. Make no mistake about it; this is real radioactive uranium gas. The Americans used this genetics changing and killing weapon on men, women and children. It made no difference to the Americans. The citizen opposition liberal groups in America who only stand on the street corners with signs are misdirecting legitimate citizen outrage and protest. These groups are more than just not effective; they contribute to the protection of the multi-national corporations, senior political and military leaders involved in these pre-planned war crimes. About ineffective protests, the famous author Ward Churchill says: "(N)o one really cares a whit that a sector of the beneficiary population (American protesters) has chosen to bear a sort of perpetual 'moral witness' to the crimes committed against the Third World. What they do care about is whether such witnesses translate their 'professions of outrage' into whatever kinds of actions may be necessary to actually put an end to the horror." [14] When will the protesters awaken and take action to put an end to this horror? Never? Sometime? When? A well planned effort The American military is nothing if not well planned. When the decision was made to go nuclear in conventional warfare with the promiscuous use of radiation dispersing uranium weapons, including land mines, bullets, shells, missiles and bombs, the proper and correct Army rules and regulations for radiological clean-up were created as well. These rules have the force of American law throughout the world. However, the same government that adopted these rules is not following them, even in the United States. Army Rules and Regulations on Radiation Poisoning (AR 700-48 and TB 9-1300-278) [15] unambiguously specify that U.S. troops and local civilians exposed to radiation poisoning will be treated. Radiation casualties exist, and provisions are made for their care as best as can be done for a non-curable bystander affliction: radiation poisoning. Clean and treat rules also apply; they are just not obeyed. In short, the regulations say that if the U.S. military is going to use radioactive weapons, then it must clean up the radiological contamination and treat the casualties. It is consistent with the philosophy of some "if you break it, fix it" former U.S. military leaders. The applicable rules and regulations are a common sense approach and the only responsible radiological warfare position for the only superpower on the planet. The rules are not followed even in the United States itself [5] but are buried away in their mountains of paperwork. Why has this approach been rejected by the senior U.S. political leadership? http://tinyurl.com/bk2yn Marion Fulk, a consultant physicist at the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab, is one of the original Manhattan Project scientists. When asked if the main purpose for using depleted uranium was for destroying things and killing people, Fulk was more specific: "I would say that it is the perfect weapon for killing lots of people." [6] Dr. Rosalie Bertell, a respected scientist who serves on a variety of Pentagon committees, says about 1.3 billion people have already been killed, maimed or diseased since the nuclear age started. [7] Is this the Pentagon's purpose for using uranium munitions and rejecting the legally mandated task to treat and clean? Most reasonable people would agree that racking up 1.3 billion people killed or maimed since the beginning of the nuclear age and the American uranium bombing tragedy spreading the gas cloud to Europe and Britain is not the "treat and clean" approach to radioactive warfare set out in the regulations. On the contrary, the Bush radioactive gas cloud is just the opposite. The plain purpose of exposing hundreds of millions of people would seem to be to kill and sicken more people. As a rare Pentagon admission said, "The properties of uranium do not change." Famed former Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab scientist Leuren Moret has spoken about the dangers of so-called "depleted uranium" in 42 countries. In "Exotic Weapons," the author, radio and film celebrity states, "Since 1991, the continued U.S. military use of dirty bombs, dirty missiles and dirty bullets threatens humanity and all living things ... and is turning Planet Earth into a death star." [8] [12] Massive carpet bombing of whole countries with uranium bombs appears to be the current war fighting plan of the U.S. military. Unfortunately, U.S. troops are the first to be sacrificed on the altar of the neocon warfare plan for total global domination. As former U.S. Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger said, "Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." [9] American political and military leaders never asked the "pawns" or troops if that was OK. In the authoritative World Affairs Journal, Moret states: "The Korea Times reported on Dec. 23, 2005, that the U.S. military has 2.7 million depleted uranium bombs [pre-positioned] in South Korea. It is understandable why North Korea wants nuclear weapons." [10] North Korea is just slightly smaller than the American state of Mississippi. Two million seven hundred uranium bombs is enough to carpet bomb with workhorse Air Force B-52s at the rate of 10 bombs per square mile. Some researchers believe that grid bombing with uranium bombs was used in the American war in the former Yugoslavia. There is clear circumstantial evidence that carpet bombing with genocidal weapons is the preferred response of the American military to local resistance efforts. The San Francisco-based humanitarian and war crimes lawyer Karen Parker states unequivocally that the use of depleted uranium in American/U.K. weapons in Iraq, Afghanistan and the former Yugoslavia is a war crime. War crimes are punishable by imprisonment or execution, typically by hanging or a firing squad. America's war criminal class of senior politicians and military leaders has a powerful reason to lie about using genocidal weapons for at least 15 years in Central Asia - their very lives depend on it. In Johnny's Dad's words, the senior leaders are "filthy rotten scum." [16] Upcoming war crimes trial The chief Nuremberg war crimes prosecutor speaks knowingly and directly across more than 50 years to resolutely instruct American citizens on exactly what our duty is today, right now: "Individuals have international duties which transcend the national obligations of obedience … therefore have the duty to violate domestic laws to prevent crimes against peace and humanity from occurring." [11] The statement was affirmed by the Nuremberg Tribunal and is now international law and, by extension, American law. It is our duty as Americans to prevent crimes against peace and humanity. The fascist administration now controlling America and the U.S. military cannot be allowed to continue these crimes. The world and international law holds us all accountable, and the price is dear. It is time to impeach and imprison members of our government for their war crimes commensurate with their degree of complicity and guilt. If the House will not impeach and the Senate will not put them on trial; then we, all 300 million Americans, have a problem. We all are citizens of this country and the world, and, as such, we must acknowledge the incontrovertible evidence of war crimes by the leaders of the American Expeditionary Forces in Iraq with the use of genocidal weapons. Bush and others crossed the line long ago when they lied to get us into the Iraq War. They continue to lie about the damage being done with uranium weapons. One of the comforts history provides us is a road map out of unthinkable situations, to a more or less tenable, workable future. The injured and maimed and families of the dead are due treatment and/or compensation, the cleanup must be initiated and whole countries rebuilt. That is the true legacy of the neocons, the new American Nazis. What people can do Every single day thousands of American military and government workers handle thousands of "sensitive" papers that "prove" the War Crimes of the American Government's senior political and military leaders. These thousands of people could, if they wanted to, create havoc in the fascist administration by providing these incriminating papers and the "smoking guns" of innumerable crimes they hold to the public: A "paper blizzard" to teach a whole new generation that what's right is right. About 40 years ago, it was thousands of pages of the "Pentagon Papers" that did the trick with the illegal Viet Nam War and President Nixon. Thousands more pages are needed now. The neocon or neolib papers like the disgraced New York Times or the conservative phantom Washington Post no longer will do the right thing. The timid NYT took almost a year to publish the proof of illegal NSA government spying on American citizens. Bush then bragged about the illegal spying on network prime time television. We do not need "timid" now. Far less than that forced Nixon to leave the president's office. Do what you think best To follow up on these ideas, the following Speaker's Group and individuals are presented to you for your important events. Speaker's fees are required. Writers & Warriors Speakers Group Contact Bob Nichols at bob.bobnichols@gmail.com for college distinguished lecture series speakers, commencement speakers, people's events and rallies. Available speakers include Leuren Moret, Dr. Doug Rokke, Dennis Kyne, Karen Parker and Bob Nichols. Topics generally include those of interest in building a positive culture in the midst of a militarized society and items of interest in nuclear warfare. A well known video, "The 14 Characteristics of Fascism," from Dr. Lawrence Britt, Ph.D., Mike Malloy and Eric Bumrich is a great, short video. See http://www.bushflash.com/14.html. It is only a few minutes long but goes a long way in telling why American leaders embrace the rampant use of genocidal weapons. The "14 Points" video is a great way to start a meeting. The following documents were consulted in the preparation of this essay. 1. Dr. Chris Busby and Saoirse Morgan, "Did the use of uranium weapons in Gulf War 2 result in contamination of Europe?" March 1, 2006, "European Biology and Bioelectromagnetics." http://www.llrc.org/du/subtopic/aldermastonrept.htm 2. Dan Fahey's instructions to his secretary, Jack Cohen, for distribution, du-list@yahoogroups, Feb. 26, 2006, 11:52 p.m. 3. Letter to Congessman McDermott, Attachment 2. Declassified memo to general L.R. Groves, director of the Manhattan Project, Oct. 30, 1943. http://tinyurl.com/93eq9 4. The Sunday Times, Britain, Feb. 19, 2006, "UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells," quoting Dr. Chris Busby. 5. Bob Nichols, "Radioactive Tank No. 9 comes limping home," San Francisco Bay View newspaper. http://tinyurl.com/bk2yn 6. Marion Fulk quoted in the San Francisco Bay View newspaper by Leuren Moret in "Depleted uranium: Dirty bombs, dirty missiles, dirty bullets - A death sentence here and abroad," Aug 18, 2004. http://www.sfbayview.com/081804/Depleteduranium081804.shtml 7. Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., "Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War." http://tinyurl.com/gf9dj 8. Leuren Moret, "Planet Earth as a Weapon and Target," World Affairs Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, Winter 2005. http://tinyurl.com/e6d8v 9. Kissinger's quote regarding military men comes from Chapter 14, which extensively discusses Al Haig, Kissinger and other Nixon staff advisors' negotiations and differences over national security issues during the 1969-1974 period. The exact, direct quote marks begin with the word 'dumb' and terminate after the word 'used.' Source: Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, "The Final Days," second Touchstone paperback edition (1994), chapter 14, pp. 194-195. 10. Leuren Moret. 11. War Crimes Watch, http://tinyurl.com/k6xb3 12. Documentary "Beyond Treason" with Moret, Rokke and Dennis Kyne. http://www.beyondtreason.com/ Documentary "Blowin' in the Wind" with Moret and Rokke. http://www.bsharp.net.au/ 13. Dissent Voice, Bob Nichols. "There Are No Words: Radiation in Iraq equals 250,000 Nagasaki Bombs ...." http://tinyurl.com/yqxoe 14. Ward Churchill, "The Ghosts of 9-1-1: Reflections on History, Justice and Roosting Chickens," Alternative Press Review http://tinyurl.com/fvhzn 15. Army Regulation 700-48 and Technical Bulletin 9-1300-278 can be found easily at the Traprock Peace Site. http://tinyurl.com/erjue and http://tinyurl.com/pzcrm And the regulations themselves, http://tinyurl.com/kl2r2 and http://tinyurl.com/jzha8 Adobe .pdf versions are also available for download from Traprock Peace Center. 16. "Johnny Got a Gun - Protest Song" by Johnny's Dad. Uranium Weapon Anthem. Distribute freely: http://tinyurl.com/k2zze This author won a prized Project Censored Award for an article on depleted uranium munitions in October 2004. The article was titled "There Are No Words." http://tinyurl.com/yqxoe (headlined in the Bay View "Radiation in Iraq equals 250,000 Nagasaki bombs," http://www.sfbayview.com/041404/radiationiniraq041404.shtml. [13] Turns out that story was but Part One, a thing I never suspected would be so. This article is Part Two and serves as an update for the war fighting activities of the senior American political and military leaders. Bob Nichols is a Project Censored Award Winner. He is a correspondent for the San Francisco Bay View newspaper and a frequent contributor to various on line publications. Nichols is completing a book based on 15 years of nuclear war in Central Asia. Nichols is a former employee of the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant. Nichols can be reached by email. You are encouraged to write bob.bobnichols@gmail.com

Note: http://tinyurl.com/bk2yn http://www.bushflash.co... http://www.llrc.org/du/... http://tinyurl.com/93eq9 http://tinyurl.com/bk2yn http://www.sfbayview.co... http://tinyurl.com/gf9dj http://tinyurl.com/e6d8v http://tinyurl.com/k6xb3 http://www.beyondtreaso... http://www.bsharp.net.au/ http://tinyurl.com/yqxoe http://tinyurl.com/fvhzn http://tinyurl.com/erjue http://tinyurl.com/pzcrm http://tinyurl.com/kl2r2 http://tinyurl.com/jzha8 http://tinyurl.com/k2zze http://tinyurl.com/yqxoe http://www.sfbayview.co...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by baybye
    Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:17 pm
    What is a uranium bomb ?? How were they utilized ?

  2. Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:17 pm
    'Depleted Uranium' is used in weapon systems in place of Lead or other metals. It is much denser and tends to 'sharpen' itself when used as a projectile (ie: bullet). Because it's denser, it tends to puncture things better than Lead or other metals, such as body and tank armour and deep ground penetrating 'bunker busters'. But due to that very nature, it also tends to become a powder or 'aerosol' when it hits a target.

    Because Uranium is a heavy metal (a group of elements that contains Lead) is also a poison to humans. It is mildly radioactive, and tends to collect itself in human organs when the aerosol is taken in to the body. The next element in the heavy metals group, Plutonium, is the strongest poison known to man.

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  3. by avatar Jacob
    Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:40 pm
    From the beginning, the US attack on Iraq has basically been a well-disguised war against Europe.

    I do not think the European nations realised this at the time and if they know it now, as many of the consequences that were not evident in 2003, start to show up.

  4. by baybye
    Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:54 pm
    Thanks for the info but I was being a little fecitious. I know what U-tipped munitions are and why there used etc. What the article mentioned was "unranium bomb" and a giant radio-active cloud over Britain, not apparently (incredable as it may sound) dectected in other European or Middle Eastern countires (at least no report of that was included). So I will out with this:
    The article is total bunk and merely a product of the writer's or someone elses fertile immagination - on a bad day. I was hoping the or someone defending the artivle writer would reply. Perhaps they will yet.

  5. by baybye
    Mon Jul 10, 2006 5:15 pm
    Really ? War against Europe ?
    What ever happened to quality education ? I mean the ability of an individul to learn to tell the difference between a collection of unconnected facts and some outlandish suggstions made in Hollywood, or has the whole world become a snakepit of capitalizing amateur investigative journalists ? Why, I couldn't wait for the book on the radio active cloud in Britain having drifted surriptiously all the way from Iraq, to hang over the Midlands poisoning cows, sheep and people too, and now already I have to bite my nails waiting for the one about America's new war on Europe !! This Conspiracy stuff must be the new product of the liberally educated Professorial class of the former generation (mine), who now get their jollies, or their revenge for that matter, indoctrinating their students on how to operate as capitalists in the new hi-tech world using the hoi ploi's mental vacuum. Is this the new student's Industry ? War against Europe ??
    I remember the heady days of do it yourself TV. This stuff seems akin to do it yourself conspiracy ! Get one because everyone needs to have one. Chapters and Ingigo await !! Book tours, signing events, interviews, documentaries, FAME FAME FAME !!!

  6. Mon Jul 10, 2006 5:21 pm
    Ahhh. I see. You forgot your <sarcasm> tags. :)

    I agree, the article is bunk. If you want real information not FUD from someone serving in Afghanistan, search Vive for comments on DU from 'Armyguy".


    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  7. Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:28 pm
    The reason the radioactive cloud was not discovered by other detectors is that Aldermaston is the home of the British Atomic Weapons Establishment. They make nukes there and must have extra fine filters capable of picking up nano sized particles of radioactive waste materials. Interestingly, Halliburton was given the contract to run the facility a few years ago, so it is understandable why they would have an interest in witholding the radiation evidence.

    You may say that the article is "total bunk", but you still have a moral and an international legal obligation under the Nuremberg Principles to seek the entire truth. If you simply refuse to believe or do nothing you merely support the contention that we live in an immoral fascist society that poisons the planet, commits genocide and is selfish and greedy.

    ---
    Michael

  8. Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:37 pm
    What bunkum you speweth forth. This writer, Bob Nichols, is not after fame, but is acting out of a sense of moral outrage and a desire to protect humanity. Obviously you have never been an activist fighting an uphill battle on a controversial issue. There is no fame or riches, only a deep satisfaction that you have tried to do something to compensate for those deadheads that rationalize their way out of doing what's really moral and refuse to stand up to evil when they should.

    ---
    Michael

  9. Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:12 pm
    Careful, Michael
    This baybye is in for a bonus on this one!
    Another attack hack enteres Vive with the same old rotten red herrings

    ---
    The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.... : Albert Einstein

  10. Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:42 am
    The issue of depleted uranium has not been investigated very thoroughly by major media. Consequently, it is difficult for anybody to discern the truth. Some say these weapons are not especially dangerous following use, while others say they are the equivalent of a dirty bomb. But there is no real visible debate between these two sides. Now there is a public forum for a debate. Visit <a href="http://www.dubbs.info">www.DUBBS.info</a> and join in with questions, opinions, evidence and answers. Also, here is a recent NATO study demonstrating that DU fragments in mice cause large increases in leukemia rates. <a href="http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/www/outreach/pdf/miller_NATO_2005.pdf"> Miller NATO 2005 report</a><p>---<br>Free and open debate on depleted uranium<br />
    www.DUBBS.info

  11. Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:20 am
    <a href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/07/10/18286855.php">http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/07/10/18286855.php</a><br />
    <br />
    Diabetes and Depleted Uranium - Italian Embassy Cover up Continues<br />
    by Bob Nichols, Project Censored Award Winner ( bob.bobnichols gmail.com ) <br />
    Monday Jul 10th, 2006 2:01 PM<p>---<br>The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.... : Albert Einstein

  12. by baybye
    Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:04 pm
    Well Michael thanks for laying out my life for me. I was so confused there ................. BTW, I appologize for my sins as given by you mate.

    If I may make a suggestion: No one in his/her right mind has the slightest hope of advancing a cause with crap like that. My suggeston would be to have the author get an education in how to research a paper and how to write it so at least a little is believable - or even interesting.

  13. by baybye
    Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:32 pm
    "What bunkum you speweth forth. This writer, Bob Nichols, is not after fame, but is acting out of a sense of moral outrage and a desire to protect humanity. Obviously you have never been an activist fighting an uphill battle on a controversial issue. There is no fame or riches, only a deep satisfaction that you have tried to do something to compensate for those deadheads that rationalize their way out of doing what's really moral and refuse to stand up to evil when they should"

    ----------------------------

    Well Michael, let me say this about that.
    1/ Whether or not Mr Nichols is sincere in his advocacy (I maintain lots are not but are in it for the money, as I said from the genteel hoi ploi), is imaterial. His stuff leaves a lot to be desired in a campaign to rouse the populace to action of some kind. Further you must admit his treatise rings a little of the conspiracy nation's current woodwind section - does it not ? Now, just where does that potential put the unfortunate fellow and his believers on the mental health scale ?
    2/ If I were you I wouldn't be using "moral outrage" as a strategy or tactic, offensively or defensively for that matter, in your quest to influence worldly affairs. It is such a variable item subject to myriad interpretations from time to time isn't it ? Check with the latest crop of murderous Jihadists if you don't get my point. We could say suicide bombers were morally outraged couldn't we. Moreover, some 8000 years of of known human history would indicate it held no great importance when matched against self interest - nor does it today.
    3/ "activist fighting an uphill battle on a ......"
    Well I spent my teens and university years in the decade known as the 60's. Seems to me that generation invented the protest movement my friend and I am not ashamed to admit I took part in marches, studies, flag burnings on behalf of Viet Nam draft dodgers in Canada and marches and countless meetings with inner city residents who did not wqnt expressways in Toronto. I also volunteered my self crazy and almost out of uiversity (I had little time for study), but persevered and here I am 40 years later with a well developed perspective on the subject - observing and still marvelling - the more things change the more they stay the same.
    4/As far as standng up to evil, the Canadian sodiers currently in Afganistan are standing up to an unspeakable evil that would blow up our parliament buildings, public buildings, subways and commercial office towers. IMO, you should join them to get a real sense of what serious moral outrage means, or, at least pledge your support for their courage and dedication to duty. Alternatively you can champion some other cause and shout "I told you so" when the fertilizer truck bomb goes off on the ramp to the emerge at the Hospital For Sick Children in Toronto.

  14. by baybye
    Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:37 pm
    Agreed beagle. There should be much more debate and research on the subject. We need to be wary when the military states there is no danger. Their motivation to say so is clear. Use of depleted U in shells and penetrating applications is great as a weapon with many advantages. But I don't think we know all the facts about the effects on the enviorment, personnel and health.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news