The North American Union Threatens Sovereignty

The NAU "plan to create" a regional government collective comprised of the United States, Canada, and Mexico is inherently anti-American. The threat is not right wing sophistry but stated clearly and directly in a May 2005 task force report published by the Council on Foreign Relations . . . and apparently being implemented without debate or approval of we the people. Once upon a time I spent an inordinate amount of time and effort reporting on the myriad evils of NAFTA and GATT. Perhaps because of my previous excesses I have been derelict in picking at the scab of the North American Union. However, others have more than adequately filled the void. Dr. Jerome Corsi has done a superb job of delineating the threats to not only our national security but our national sovereignty. Corsi says the "blueprint" which President Bush is following to create a North American Union was "laid out" in the CFR report, "The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union." Despite (or because of) the absence of main stream media attention, the Bush administration is clearly "pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union." This is not some benign partnership agreement but a concerted effort to effectively erase our borders with both Mexico and Canada. Government NAU policy is being pursued as a "mushroom principle" in which we the people are kept in the dark and fed horse excrement. It is being created "through a process of governmental regulations" and without ever "having to bring the issue before the American people for a clear referendum or vote," Corsi observes. The globalists are scared spitless that NAU sparks a repeat of the NAFTA debate. NAFTA was supposed to have been similar finessed done deal. Most people frankly don’t know or care about free trade. NAFTA was supposed to sail through the process without fanfare or attention. However, we almost succeeded in killing the beast. NAFTA passed Congress by one vote (Al Gore’s as president of the U.S. Senate broke the tie). I often note that it is not a question of who is right or wrong but what is right or wrong that counts. A recent Foreign Affairs article by Kenneth F. Scheve and Matthew J. Slaughter (www.foreignaffairs.org/20070701faessay86403/kenneth-f-scheve-matthew-j-slaughter/a-new-deal-for-globalization.html) included an opening summary: “Globalization has brought huge overall benefits, but earnings for most U.S. workers — even those with college degrees — have been falling recently; inequality is greater now than at any other time in the last 70 years . . . To save globalization, policy-makers must spread its gains more widely. The best way to do that is by redistributing income.” Whose income do you think the globalists want to redistribute? The socialists on steroids don’t intend to tax Mexican migrant workers or Canadian subsistence fishermen and hunters. Willie Sutton robbed banks because “that’s where the money is.” The NAU is very much a process and not an event. http://www.newsmax.com/geoff_metcalf/north_american_union/2007/08/26/27563.html [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on August 29, 2007]

Note: www.foreignaffairs.org/... http://www.newsmax.com/...