Justice Lynn Ratushny found three sections of the so-called leakage provisions of the Security of Information Act were unconstitutionally vague and overly broad.
At the same time, the Ontario Superior Court justice also lambasted the Mounties for abusing the legal process by targetting O'Neill with the aim of "intimidating her into compromising her constitutional right of freedom of the press."
Wade Deisman, a criminology professor and director of the National Security Working Group at the University of Ottawa, said the decision not to appeal will both speed up a rewrite of the contentious law and focus another negative light on the country's security apparatus.
He said the O'Neill case bears out fears, expressed by critics when the secrecy law was toughened in 2001, that the provisions "would be used to disguise misdeeds done by the RCMP."
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/11/03/pf-2220458.html
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on November 6, 2006]
Note: http://cnews.canoe.ca/C...

Looks like the latest incarnation of a "new" government will continue on with their plans of total domination over the Canadian people, a plan put into effect by their Liberal predecessor. It clearly does not matter who you vote for when they all follow the exact same plan.
The "new" government won't challenge their unconstitutional "laws" in court, because they sense that the courts are refusing to tow the party line and such a move will fail and further undermine their assumed authority. Instead, they will work around the courts, which is exactly what is happening in the USA.
Watch and see.
And many still want to believe we have a democracy, which is why it works so well.