U.S. Official Says North American Trade Pact Aids All Signatories

Posted on Tuesday, September 12 at 10:07 by jensonj
"The NAFTA partners are investing more in each others' economies, and the rest of the world is also investing more in our economies," Melle said. Even though the NAFTA contribution to each nation's broader economic performance cannot be measured precisely, Melle told legislators that Mexico's gross domestic product (GDP) has grown 40 percent since 1993 and Canada's real GDP expanded nearly 50 percent during this period. In addition to these economic successes, Melle said that NAFTA remains a vibrant agreement in part because it has responded to changes in production methods and sourcing methods. Melle explained that since 1994, the NAFTA partners have accelerated elimination of tariffs four times, with a total value of trilateral trade covered by these rounds of tariff cuts of approximately $28 billion. The USTR official said the NAFTA partners also have implemented three sets of changes to the NAFTA rules of origin, with a total value of trade covered by these changes of more than $39 billion. Apart from these changes, he said, the United States, Mexico and Canada have resolved a number of thorny trade disputes in 2006. Recent successes in this area include the conclusion of a bilateral agreement on tequila between the United States and Mexico, a separate agreement between the two nations on cement and sweeteners, and final agreement between the United States and Canada to resolve a softwood lumber dispute that had dogged trade relations for almost 20 years. (See related article.) Looking ahead, Melle said there still are NAFTA commitments that must be implemented. Although all tariff cuts between the United States and Canada have been implemented, the remaining tariff reductions between the United States and Mexico will be made January 1, 2008. Although less than 1 percent of U.S. NAFTA trade with Mexico will be affected, the final removal of these tariffs has raised concerns. Nonetheless, Melle said that NAFTA trade ministers reaffirmed in March their commitment to the full implementation of NAFTA. Other challenges the NAFTA partners must confront include the changes in global trade since NAFTA entered into force. Melle said that all the NAFTA partners have concluded other trade agreements since 1994 and face increased competition in each other’s markets as well as with the economies of such countries as China and India. The NAFTA partners must consider how to address increased security concerns without creating trade barriers, Melle said. This is the fundamental challenge of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, the USTR official said. "With the NAFTA firmly in place, the United States and its NAFTA partners have not only become better customers for each other but better neighbors, more committed partners, and effective colleagues in a wide range of trade-related international organizations," he said. For additional information, see Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. (Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov) http://tinyurl.com/kqvdd [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 13, 2006]

Note: http://usinfo.state.gov http://tinyurl.com/kqvdd

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by lombar
    Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:35 pm
    Yes, it has done Canada so well that Food bank demand has tripled in the same time. Being dependent upon others for our industry is a long-term losing proposal, along with selling raw resources. Investors get the mine, the people get the shaft.

  2. Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:07 am
    This is all absolute hogwash.<br />
    <br />
    Perhaps the amount of trade has increased and I don't doubt the percentages duly reported by a bureaucrat who is absolutely out of touch with the real world.<br />
    <br />
    While all of this great trade has being going on, people are losing their jobs by the hour, labour unions are becoming an endangered species, the middle class is evaporating, and as the previous writer has said, the line-up for food banks has exceeded everyone's imagination. There's not enough food to go around, and we have discovered a 'new class' in Canada called the 'working poor.'<br />
    <br />
    So, it matters not that the elite are tripping over their money, and the CEO's of the big corporations are willing to sell out Canada to the North American Union. We're scheduled to go down the tubes and become a fascist state!<br />
    <br />
    This 'Melle" character says that everyone is making huge profits, so what's the problem? Typical right wing response.<br />
    <br />
    NAFTA has been an absolute disaster for this country, and if you want to see where we're headed next, read my 4 part article on the North American Union here at ViveleCanada or at <a href="http://realitycheck.typepad.com">http://realitycheck.typepad.com</a><br />

  3. by Patm
    Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:53 am
    Well, the title is truthful anyway. I have no doubt that every person who's signature is on the treaty documents has benefitted GREATLY. Its just that the rest of us are paying their benefits.

  4. Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:17 am
    The question is who gave the CEO's the right to make any deals on behalf of the people? We didn't elect them, we have no recourse to them so why are they allowed to enter into agreements or set up committees to create plans which our governments rubber stamp? Yes I'm sure that all those who signed on are going to benefit, but do the people benefit?

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news