U.S. Decision To Ditch Talks On Border Plan Raises Questions About Relations

Posted on Monday, April 30 at 10:07 by jensonj
He was involved in early discussions about moving U.S. Customs operations to Canadian soil at the Peace Bridge linking Ontario and New York. "It's just not productive. For Pete's sake, we're working with Canada. We're not working with some Third World country." A successful pilot project at the Peace Bridge would have been expanded to other crossings, easing traffic snarls that cost Canada some C$8 billion a year. But Homeland Secretary Michael Chertoff pulled out of talks this week after two years of high-level discussions. It came as a rude surprise to many since the measure is part of the Security and Prosperity Partnership announced with great fanfare by the leaders of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico in 2005 to keep borders open to trade but closed to terrorists. Getting the project off the ground by the end of this year was cited as a top priority in February by the North American Competitiveness Council that reports to the leaders. U.S. sources close to the discussions say the chief explanation for the move is a lingering view in the Bush administration that Canada's a pipeline for terrorists. And they've got big concerns about the impact on diplomatic relations. "For the U.S. to move unilaterally like this, what does that do for our credibility in trilateral talks?" asked one, who said the White House almost certainly gave its blessing to Chertoff. The main sticking point was Homeland's unwillingness to accept Canada's legal problem with having U.S. authorities take fingerprints of people who approach the border but decide not to cross. Canadian law doesn't permit fingerprinting unless someone volunteers or has been charged with a crime. Canada's assurances that it would co-operate in investigating any suspicious person who approaches the border weren't enough, said one Capitol Hill source. "The Attorney General's office really just wants to grab as much biometric information as it can," said the source. Canada won't consider any proposal that doesn't comply with Canadian law, Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day said Thursday in Ottawa. But he's hopeful the U.S. will come back to the table. http://www.canada.com:80/topics/news/national/story.html?id=fc27a12e-2229-4bcd-9686-7961ec20d077&k=24741 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 30, 2007]

Note: http://www.canada.com:8...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by Rural
    Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:50 pm
    Did anyone realy expect any "negotiations" even secret ones, to proceed if the bullys dont get it all their own way. Time to hunker down and protect our own asses? I wonder what Canada will give away to get around this one?

    ---
    When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to remember that the initial objective was to drain the swamp

  2. Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:20 pm
    Why should we care how they decide to protect their borders? It's their country. We aren't obliged to visit.

    I think we should reciprocate. Fingerprint and DNA samples from any American entering Canada.

    ---
    The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.

  3. Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:48 pm
    I haven't been to the US since 1980 and didn't miss a thing.

    This whole thing is nothing more than propaganda campaign to force Canadians to accept "deep integration" and the NAU, so they can go "shopping".

    Ed Deak

  4. Wed May 02, 2007 4:45 am
    "The Attorney General's office really just wants to grab
    as much biometric information as it can," said the
    source.

    Anyrthing to screw over as many people as possible for
    no good reasons. How Un-American of them. Quite a
    shocker!

  5. by Deacon
    Wed May 02, 2007 7:56 am
    Well, if Canadian citizens aren't good enough to be allowed into the US, then I say we assume that Canadian resources aren't good enough either.

    Linking free transit to resource exports to the US will light a fire under their butts pretty fast.

    Unless of course they can find a way to make up for all the power, petroleum, and lumber given the same notice the Homeland security Chief gave for leaving the talks.

    "What's that Mr Chartoff? What do you mean we can't do that? You did, we're just returning the favour. Now, you care to partake in serious negotiations, or do we make the cut off permanent?

    Or doesn't "Homeland Security" take those factors into account?"

    man, they'd be so pissed...

    ---
    The two most common things in the universe are apparently Hydrogen and stupidity.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news