(This sounds an awful lot like the Senate's "Immigration Reform" Bill to me…)
This trilateral agreement was signed by the President without authorization from Congress, and, judging by the outrage to the current illegal immigration situation, completely against the will of the American people as well. In reports published on World Net Daily it is revealed that the membership and "work product" of the working groups has not been disclosed or published anywhere. Though bills were introduced in both houses of Congress, those bills were never voted on, never made it out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. I suspect, then, that our elected representatives are well aware of the agenda, but either washed their hands of it (lest they incur the ire of their constituencies), or chose to keep it under wraps. Either way, they had to have known the American people would see this as a direct assault on our sovereignty, and be deeply alarmed by it.
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0606/0606spp.htm
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on June 28, 2006]
Note: http://www.enterstageri...
Security And Prosperity For Who?
Posted on Tuesday, June 27 at 08:20 by jensonjContributed By
Topic
Article Rating
(0 votes)
Options
Stumble It!Comments
view comments in forum
Page 1
New book out which helps to put the strategy now becoming so apparent, in perspective - The Bush Agenda
Invading the World, One Economy at a Time
by Antonia Juhasz - it really should be called the Conservative/neo-con elite agenda because it doesn't matter who's at the head, the plan is the same.
So it really is about 'us against them', we just didn't get the meaning before. Lower taxes is a slogan the people buy, but again it isn't for the people its for the multi-nationals, the big boys- why should they put any of their 'hard-earned' money into social programs, when they can well afford to pay for private care.
That is why in Alberta the people subsidize the oil industry. It's called corporate welfare and that is ok,(to some) single mothers trying to raise their kids and needing welfare, that is not ok(to some). I mean really people, which has more value, helping the oil industry raise a barrel and increase their profits so the shareholders are happy; or help a mother raise a child when they could just as easily live on the street, or borrow from their neighbors, or church and besides all you have is one healthy future contributing citizen! Its about balance people.
The war on terror is the war to prevent the people from gaining any resources to survive, we are the enemy since we stand in the way of them reaching their full profit expectations. If we refuse to give it up, or to be slaves to the empire that would be terrorizing for them. So they offer security and prosperity and the people think its about them....ha ha ha... what a great joke eh?
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
There ain't none, because both are undefinable, philosophical concepts that vary with each individual, society and country.
This is one of the reasons why globalization is a crime wave and has no other purpose than to deprive people of their own democratic decision making rights.
We're off to town now on our biweekly shopping spree with our welfare bum pensions, but I hope others would consider these points and express views on them ?
Definitions are extremely important facts in our society, when our governments are signing 3,000 page "free trade" treaties, making defintions and selling off our citizen's rights, and I would like to call attention to the question: What are they signing away, when our elementary, idividual rights are either not defined, or ignored?
Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.