The Apec forum was inaugurated in 1994, aiming at "free and open trade and investment in the Asia Pacific" for industrial countries by 2010. The group includes the US, Canada, China, Japan and Australia.
Older readers will no doubt rub their eyes at the thought that communist/capitalist Vietnam is now a member of the World Trade Organisation (as well as the International Monetary Fund) and hosting a trade talks meeting at which an American president will be present. So many memories of the Vietnam war have recently been evoked, not least because of the more obvious parallels with Iraq.
The concern of US senators from textile states is obvious: the benefits of free trade may be a kind of religious mantra among economists and trade officials, but the wonders to economists of comparative advantage, where sectors specialise in areas of respective strength, do not seem so obvious to people whose jobs are threatened by a reduction in trade barriers.
A couple of years ago at the Davos World Economic Forum I was particularly struck when someone who had been a senior international official promoting free trade and open markets for many years told me he had had experienced what he called an epiphany at a college reunion.
http://business.guardian.co.uk/economicdispatch/story/0,,1947577,00.html
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on November 17, 2006]
Note: http://business.guardia...

One that goes up and it will, if they're even semi-intelligent, they'll start rebuilding manufacturing facilities domestically again.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
There's no free trade, never was and never will be. The purpose of the whole criminal exercise is the free movement of capital to colonize and separate the producers from the users, making fortunes for the middlemen, while everybody else is going down the drain.
Ed Deak.
---
"Son, if you wanna get ahead in this world, never work for another man as long as you live."
Translation: Long live arrogant monopolies, subsidy-addicted hothouse flowers, inefficient state-owned enterprises, high prices, poor service, poor quality, lack of choice, unmet demand, Central Canadian mercantilism, government winner picking and favoritism.
What good is disposable income if everything costs too much or is in insufficient supply?