Yesterday I received an email with the following question:
Who else would listen to my accounts of employment agencies not hiring unilingual applicants? Do you know who I could make a complaint to? The PSC has very rarely posted jobs lately that are of long term-permanent that are coded as “various linguistic profiles” and they usually mean BBB-CBC-CCC-not much other than that-The agencies tell me that is what their requirements are. OK, then what about crying discrimination? The visible minorities did it and the disabled did it-therefore “Employment Equity” so how about it?? 99% of private employment is requesting bilingualism also..
It was in response to the commentary on “Official Languages” I sent out to a concerned American a few days ago, the text of which appears further below. Perhaps the following message has some significance for you, regardless of your views or you determination on Western Separation. (I will be writing on that subject soon.)
Stand Up And Fight
Here’s the thing …..
Everything I write on the subject of language inequity has an underlying component. Sometimes it is right up front and obvious but mostly, it is between the lines so as not to alarm anyone or piss people off. That component is: stand up and fight, get your families, your friends and your neighbours to join your cause by standing up with you and fight for your rights, because they too are victims of the constant erosion of their rights, and power comes in numbers. The more people get involved the more power can be applied to your cause. The time for waiting or hoping that someone else will do it for you is long past.
What amazes me is that people are willing to go on strike by standing in the freezing cold or rain for days or weeks on end while getting little or no income during that militant action, for the purpose of getting another fifty cents an hour and maybe a few other insignificant benefits, the final result of which will cost a few of their colleagues their jobs and an increase in the cost of living, but cannot see that fighting for their rights which in the case of so many people means that, because they can’t speak French, they can’t even get a job to go on strike for.
Here are a few questions you need to ask of yourself and the country you live in. Is it not time that you and all the people you know started taking “affirmative” action to fight for your rights? Is it not time for you to go on a meaningful strike across the country to protest the imposition of French where it is neither needed nor wanted? Is it not time to march in the streets demanding that your language and cultural rights be reinstated? Is it not time for you to take strong actions to let your elected representatives at all levels of governments, municipal, provincial and federal, know that you are fed up and that you are not going to take it anymore? Is it not time to take whatever action is necessary to be heard and to force the people you have elected to office to represent your interests and not those of a very morally corrupt political establishment?
The temperature is rising. And as long as people sit on their duffs, waiting for some groups or individual to take action for them, the temperature will keep on rising until the lid blows off. Then it will be either time for a cultural revolution which could turn nastier than the confrontation on the Plains of Abraham or, since we are such nice Canadians, we could settle back into our normal state of apathy to avoid nastiness, loose all of our rights under Napoleon’s feudal Civil Code while we are governed by the French from Quebec city under the powder puff blue Fleur de Lis. The choice is yours.
Meanwhile, you can write, phone, email, and walk into constituency offices, city hall committee rooms and mayors’ offices to demand that action be taken to correct these injustices. You can write to Dyane Adam at the Office of Official Languages, to Mauril Belanger, the Liberal MP in charge of languages, to the Prime Minister and to the Leaders of the Opposition Parties. This must be done in large numbers so as to flood their offices with your concerns. Hard copy letters are much more effective than emails which send out automatic responses and then get deleted before human eyes get to see them.
The power is in your hands. Use it.
Sebastian Anders
<< File: Response to Jim from the US.doc >>
The text below is a response to a question I received from a concerned American who read my Commentary “Canada’s Solitudes”
Official Languages
Very few countries have official languages. Language is a part of our culture that evolves with the evolution of the society in which it flourishes. It is self-controlling. As long as it is in a constant state of evolution, it thrives. A language must evolve as do all living things, which means it must improve with use. To try to maintain it in its pure form by not allowing foreign influence into the language is to kill it. That is why the English language is the most vibrant of languages on this planet because it borrows from other languages and invents words as needed. And I am not talking about slang and the bastardisations of the language such as “Ebonics” and “Chicano” or “Hip” or any forceful change to the language that are done out of a sense of opposition to the norm rather than the natural evolutionary process.
As soon as a language is declared an official language, there is a paradigm shift in the minds of the purists and all the other “…ists and isms” that you can think of. And if you have the sorry misfortune of falling into the trap of ideologists by declaring two or more languages “official”, then you set the wheels in motion for a cultural war which has no regard for the principles of democracy; principles that are based on the rule by the majority. In Canada, that is called the “Tyranny of the Majority”. So to avoid such a dastardly view of the world, our socialist “friends” tell us that we must submit ourselves to “Rule by the Minority” because, they say, the majority cannot guarantee the protection of the minorities. What these “ists” are not able to appreciate is that only the majority can guarantee the protection of the minorities because the majority is made up of minorities. To do otherwise is to live under the “Tyranny of the Minority, which is what Canada has become, and what the US is rapidly falling into, if it is not already there.
The problem with Canada is that we have had too much unskilled immigration, which has been very beneficial to the present ruling Federal party, and to the French minority because it is their opportunity to regain control of the country they lost in 1760. They simply cannot accept the defeat of the French by the English nearly two hundred and fifty years ago. It is their way of turning back the clock of defeat so as to make it into a victory, belated though it may be. Similarly, the “Latinos” of the US would also like to turn the clock of history and regain the country they claim is theirs and was lost in bad faith, or whatever explanations the ideologists wish to throw in your faces.
In Canada, the French control the immigration and our embassies around the world, putting extreme limits on immigration from Western Europe, Australia, or any other English speaking country. Meanwhile, they are actively recruiting French speaking immigrants from African countries, many of whom belong to the terrorist training centres such as Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, etc., so as to increase the “French Factor” across the country. This is definitely something the US should be concerned about especially in view of recent reports from Belgium and the Netherlands.
Just this past week the news came out that our ruling “Liberals” (equivalent to US Democrats) and their bureaucratic minions have decided to increase the numbers by another 100,000 per year, over the 270,000 previously aimed for. We are already overburdened with an excess of welfare recipients as well as the fact that the government has lost track of over 40,000 illegal immigrants, many of whom are known war criminals and terrorists. At least, they claim they have lost track of them. I don’t think that is possible. Nevertheless, that is the situation that we, the ignorant masses, are allowed to know.
Meanwhile, in the US you have the very same problem where too much unskilled immigration has been allowed and your society is overwhelmed with people who refuse to learn English and want to impose their language on the rest of you on the pretext that it is their constitutional right and that no one has a right to insist that they speak English. The only solution that I can see for both countries is to put a moratorium on immigration of all people whose first language is not English or who do not speak English “very” fluently.
To declare English as the official language of the US would start constitutional wars that would keep the courts overburdened with language issue trivialities when there are much more important issues to be resolved. To declare two or more languages official would put the country into a much worse social and cultural war than the black/white battles of past generations ever were. It would also require that every document, public or private, be done in all official languages, which would so overburden the economy that you would soon become a third world banana republic, as is the case in Canada. (Beware of the French Factor in the US - there are attempts at expanding their domain in the US as well.)
However, to declare English the “Dominant” language of the land (without making it the official language) and all government documentation, at all levels, English only, and making full fluency in English a prerequisite for immigration into the country and for school graduation, and at the same time allowing the use of other languages as the market dictates, would go a long way to preventing such cultural wars. At least, that is my perspective, and I stand by it.
Sebastian Anders
Commentary by L. Sebastian Anders
[address edited out]
14 October 2005
Canada’s Solitudes
In her inaugural speech, Canada’s new Governor General spoke of putting an end to the “Two Solitudes”. She put great emphasis on the importance of the French language and culture inside and outside Quebec, but failed to even acknowledge the English-speaking people of Canada. In fact, the word English is nowhere to be found in the text of her speech.
The French Elites fail to recognize that English is the dominant world language in business, in medicine, in science and technology, in space exploration and in world politics, and is the principal language of communication for ninety percent of Canadians. A nation needs but one dominant language, regardless of political catch phrases such as “Two Founding Nations”. And English ancestry is not a prerequisite to claim English as one’s “mother tongue”. Newcomers to Canada happily accepted English as the working language of Canada in order to be part of this great nation, until the imposition of Bilingualism and Biculturalism, followed by Multiculturalism, the result of which is a bitterly divided country.
For too long, Provincial Premiers have not had the fortitude to say no to the constant and unrelenting demands of Quebec or the militant French organisations across Canada. And now, the proposed Bill S4 is designed to completely take away provincial language rights.
Meanwhile, French is spread, promoted and imposed across Canada in the public service, in business, the police, and the military, in schools and on signs everywhere. Government jobs and more and more private sector jobs are preferentially being given to Quebecers. Non-French speaking peoples’ careers are being frozen or terminated. At the same time, the immigration department is actively seeking French-speaking immigrants from African countries to expand the French Factor across Canada, while a justice committee is working on reconciling the French Civil code with English Common Law, the implications of which can easily be imagined.
Regardless of the evidence to the contrary, the English masses of Canada still refuse to believe this is actually going on in “Canada the Good”. They have allowed themselves to become second-class citizens and made to feel ashamed of not speaking French. They have become accomplices to the language industry by believing the propaganda that their children will have no future unless they are enrolled in French immersion classes, creating countless jobs for Quebec teachers across the country.
Money from Quebec is buying out major businesses and industries across the country, especially out west, spreading the French Factor and forcing English-speaking people out of their jobs, out of their homes and out of the country. And if they don’t wake up to reality and take their heads out of the sand, the powder puff blue Quebec Fleur-de-Lis Flag will soon be flying atop buildings across the country.
The Federal Government speaks of “Asymmetrical Federation” while the Bloc constantly reminds us of the tax dollars they will extract from Canada. The French Elites who insist on imposing their linguistic and cultural distinctiveness on Canadians across the country, and the Francophiles who support it, have been the cause of most of Canada’s economic, social and political discords and upheavals for generations.
Western Separation may be a solution to some and it may very well happen, but it is not the best option. Canadians need to stop accusing the Feds of being responsible of every ill that is destroying the country. It is time they started electing Provincial Leaders that have the guts to stand up to Ottawa and take back what is theirs, instead of holding Premiers’ Conferences, speak a few words of bravado, then go back home with a handful of silver coins and their tails between their legs. It is time to open the door and firmly invite Quebec to leave the Federation, without letting them take the furniture, the bank account and the credit cards.
Sebastian Anders
---
Your mantra has been your opinions are stifled due to their contrary nature, when they are actually stifled for being without perceivable foundation.
And some of us need to stop blaming Quebec as well. Though I am an English born and English speaking Canadian, I believe our multi-culturalism should be embraced, though not 'enforced', as a general rule. There is certainly need for immigration reform, but I don't see the need to enforce complete bilingualism, either to existing citizens or to newly landed ones. As long as there is a basic understanding of either one of our two languages, we 'shouldn't' have too many problems. It's when immigrants are allowed in without any grasp of either French or English that there can be serious implications.
All that said, though I'm no great fan of our present Liberal leadership -- if you believe hope of a true democracy exists, we all need to get off our butts and get involved (what is our voter turnout percentage?). Otherwise, stop yer whinin'...
---
"Let me be very clear about this. Steroids ought to be banned from baseball." G.W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2005
I must give credit to Quebecers though. They are much smarter then the people in Ontario and rest of Canada. Quebec left Canada years ago but they were clever enough to leave the ATM machine plugged in. I rather prefer to live beside the Americans then Quebec. I relate more to America then Quebec.
Canadian Mark Steyn writing in the London Telegraph states
"multiculturism promotes every culture at the expense of our own. Best described as cultural suicide".
Because multiculturalism in itself is not bad. It's the people who use it for political means, and other dishonest means, that are the problem. Plus, on top of that, the majority of my dearest friends are Quebecois. I love how they view life and how they live each moment with 'verve' and determination, emotion and adventure. We would all do well to take some notes and apply some of that joy to our own lives, rather than isolate their behaviour and fear them. Life is too short my friend - we don't have time for so much negativity.
---
"Let me be very clear about this. Steroids ought to be banned from baseball." G.W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2005
Really? Try telling that to the Dutch and the British. There is much anxiety in the Netherlands due to the islamification of Amsterdam. The Van Gogh murder was just the straw that broke the camel's back. There was a race riot in Birmingham, Britain's second largest city, a short while ago. You'd be surprised at the participant's ethnicity. One grop consisted of blacks and the other were South Asians (Pakistani's mostly). There was another race riot in Oldham, England a few years back between whites and South Asians. Continuing the violece here in Canada the South Asian community thought it would a good idea to "embrace multiculturalism" and go toe to toe with the Italians in Woodbrigem, Ontario just north of Toronto across Steeles avenue. Minor scuffles between the two groups were ongoing throughout the summer. Looks like violence is part of South Asian culture. Not surprising considering that India is one of the most violent socities on the planet.
Multiculturalism is proving to be unworkable and socially divisive. It's only us smug Canadians that think Canada is different. Language is tied to culture. It's only a matter of time until Canada is guilt tripped into recognizing more than two official languages. It'll probably happen around election time too when the Liberals are in danger of losing power.
Accusing Quebec of increasing the number of French speaking immigrants is absurbed. Canada imports more Chinese nationals (China, Hong Kong, Taiwan) than we do French speaking Africans and the Chinese don't bother themselves to learn English. We can easily assume how little they care about learning French.
What Jean meant when she said the "end of two solitudes" is to suggest the end of the English/French identity of Canada and replace it a multicultural identity of many solitudes and this should be of concern to any Canadian whether you live in the ROC or Quebec. If you think Canada is having trouble reconciling the differences between the "two solitudes" just wait and see what mess we get ourselves into with the many solitudes society. We should not embrace multicultualism. It is dangerous. The English/French identity does have its problems but it is part of the Canadian identity as whole and it should be fostered.
My argument is that multiculturalism in itself is not bad. It's we the people who screw things up. Perhaps more honest education is in order, from the ground level up. Of course, more government accountability wouldn't hurt.
You could kill a person with a pencil. Then again, you could use it to write a beautiful novel.
---
"Let me be very clear about this. Steroids ought to be banned from baseball." G.W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2005
Please forgive my lack of Canadian understanding. It is so gauche of me to pretend I understand anything about Quebec and the French. Of course, the fact that my paternal ancesters came from France four centuries ago and settled in Quebec and that my generation was the first one to cross over to Eastern Ontario across the river from Quebec where we are completely out of touch with matters French and Quebecois. My maternal ancesters came from Germany and settled in Gaspe three centuries ago and were assimilated into the French culture and language due to intermarriage, but the fact that I have a few drops of German blood flowing through my veigns probably nullifies any claim on French ancestry.
Then, the fact that I lived in Montreal and other parts of Quebec for years makes me ignorant of the French factor in Canada and most especially in Quebec. I hope you will find it in your generous French heart to forgive my terrible faux pas to dare express an opinion based on complete ignorance of the facts.
Living in France did not help either to understand the French. Learning the real French language, as opposed to the "joual" spoken in Quebec and with which I grew up is not something I can refer to in my musings on the subject. Of course, I have no understanding of your culture or how it compares with others since I only lived in about a dozen countries and had the horrible experience of having to learn other languages.
It is so very thoughtless of me to make the assuptions i did. Perhaps you could educate me so that I do not make such uneducated statements in the future. I bow before you in all humilty and beg for your understanding of my lowly ramblings in matters with which you are obviously so much more knowledgeable than I. May God have mercy on my soul.
Sebastian Anders
---
Writer - Social and Political Commentary
Cumberland (Ottawa), ON
Obviously, you must have a multitude of admirers since you use such colourful language, common to Franco "Canadians" (and I use the word Canadian reservedly since you have such an aversion to it) and Quebecois. I can easily understand your frustration with the English, especially since the battle on the Plains of Abraham. After all, they did not really win then because they "cheated", or something to that effect. Isn't that what is in the "New (Revised) Quebec History" books?
You (and I mean that as the general big YOU, not you personally since I would not want you to misinterpret my words as a personal attack on the fine person that you are)have great difficulty in accepting the fact that there are other opinions about what is going on in this country and that reality is not just what you imagine it or believe it to be because of your cultural biases.
I have a question for you in reference to the statistics you provided above. How many centuries of immigration does this cover? Because these numbers certainly do not reflect the facts of the last twenty or so years. Of course, any intelligent person knows that statistics are the worse kind of information one can use as reliable information since these can be made to reflect whatever the user wants them to mean. And as you indicated above, you want them to mean that I am a "liar".
Your reference to the English as being the Damned is common out of the mouths of Franco Canadians and more specifically the Quebecois. It is your choice expression whenever referring to these "damned" English liars(Maudits Anglais - menteurs). Of course, your choice of the colouful language (some would call it "foul language")is clearly an indication of the limitations of your intelligence, which is typical.
Admittedly, the French are making great strides in Canada, outside Quebec. Since you are all convinced that, had the English not cheated on the Plains of Abraham, all of Canada would be French now. So in your efforts at turning back the clock through historical revisionism, by having so many Quebecois in charge in Ottawa, in the government as well as in the public service across the country, and the passage of laws such as Bill-S3, you are succeeding in accomplishing just that.
Of course having all those militant French organisations across the country in every province, the organisation known as Canadian Parents for French, all very well paid by Canadian (not Quebec)taxpayers dollars, along with Adscam moneys being recycled to buy out Canadian Companies and businesses across the country in a stealth fashion, you are succeeding. Soon Canada will be French and you can kick all those English butts out of the country, because you are unable to co-exist with anyone but your own kind.
The traditional hatred that the French (especially the Quebecois) have for the English is as deep seated as that of the 8000 year old feuds of the Middle East. Hatred is such an ugly trait of character. but it fits you perfectly. Someday, when your humanity has evolved sufficiently, you may be able to shed these shackles. Unitl then, I pity your sorrowful soul.
Sebastian Anders
---
Writer - Social and Political Commentary
Cumberland (Ottawa), ON
I never thought that I would someday speak (or write ) to a saint. Wow!!! Are you really a saint? Or is that just a cover up to hide who you are. I am not afraid to say who I am. My name is everywhere. And it is my real name too. I have nothing to hide or fear from anyone because of my opinions. Check it out.
Although I agree with your assessment of multiculturalism as destructive to our social fabric, and so many other negatives, it is obvious to me, because of my involvement in the language issue and how it is being proliferated across the country, that you lack some fundamental knowledge of the issue.
I must clarify one bit to which you refer. I don't believe I accused Quebec of increasing the number of French immigrants in Canada. Quebec only has control of the immigrtion in Quebec. They cannot directly impose their immigrants on the rest of Canada. Instead, the French Cabal in the Liberal Government (that is in the last throws of its existence as I speak - unless they are able to pull a rabbit out a hat - by using less than honest means at the polls as they have done many times in the past) and the Francophiles in the rest of Parliament and in the public service administration, especially in immigration, have official policies to refuse immigration to candidates from Europe, (our traditional source of immigrants) but most especially from the UK, also from Austratlia and NZ ( a definite bias against the English sources of immigrants) in preference for French speaking immigrants from third world countries, regardless of other qualifications (and this is official policy, my friend). This was implemented by the immigration department (apparently) at the insistance of the Office of the Commisioner of Official Languages' Director, Dyane Adam.
As for your reference to what Michael Jean meant, you cannot pretend to know what she meant unless you have access to her brain and her thought process. If she was indeed referring to the English / French divide or solitudes as the identity of Canada, why did she not make reference to that, why is it that in her speech she poured praises on the French but made not a single reference to the English or even acknowledge their existence. The word Englisn does not appear anywhere in her speech. So how can you pretend to know what she thought?
My conclusion is simply this. Anyone choosing to come to Canada, whatever their circumstances, however dire these may be, should come to this country with the intention becoming Canadians, not hyphenated, pretend Canadians to get whatever they can get out of our generosity. They should definitely leave their baggage behind, whatever those may be. Yes, they can hang onto their religion, but never criticize our religion or claim that it is offensive to theirs.
They can bring "some" of their cultural traditions, as long as they are not in conflict with our traditions, our customs or our laws, and never criticize ours or claim that ours are offensive to their way of life.
They must adapt to our way of life and our traditions, including the way they dress, especially in our institutions such as the RCMP, or claim the right to bear arms because it is a religious right in their country. If they want to retain the religious traditions or the customs of their country, then perhaps they should stay there.
Their traditional forms of dress can be retained only as long as it is not in conflict with our traditions, our customs and our laws, or a danger in the work place, or as in some cases, can be construed as threats to our society because of the ability to hide weapons or other sources of danger to Canadian people. If this is not acceptable to them, then they are not welcomed here.
I welcome people of all races, colour or religion to Canada, if they meet the criteria of what is good for Canada, in matters of age, education, training and experience. And that includes the ability to speak at least one of our "Official" languages. If they are coming to Quebec, French would be acceptable. But if they are going anywhere else in Canada, then English must be required.
Canadians should not have to bear the burden of programs for retraining and language education for those who cannot speak the required language, French for Quebec and English for the rest of Canada. This is putting an unfair burden on the working people of Canada.
The system that is in place at present is there to fulfil the political agenda of those responding to the demands of special interest groups, of those buying their votes from special interest groups by selling their souls, not to the "saints" but to the devil. Government by special interest groups must come to an end.
Sebastian Anders
---
Writer - Social and Political Commentary
Cumberland (Ottawa), ON