"All the indications are that Prime Minister [Paul Martin] will welcome the opportunity to take advantage of Canada's antipathy toward the Bush administration. The fact that he's been taking shots already in public places over softwood lumber indicates that we might be in for a little bit of an anti-American election," says Kim Nossal, head of political studies at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont. "And there is no Conservative who is going to defend the policies of the Bush administration. So Conservative leader Stephen Harper is going to have to fit negatively with Bush, but not with the United States necessarily."
This fall, Mr. Martin began using strong rhetoric to warn that U.S. resistance to repaying illegal duties on softwood lumber from Canada undermines free trade.
Foreign policy experts say the Liberals will reinforce the message on the campaign trail, hoping to appeal to the political left by underlining the party's key policy differences with U.S. President George W. Bush. Canada's refusal to join the U.S.-led war in Iraq in 2003 and Mr. Martin's recent decision to stay out of the American ballistic missile defence plan are considered leverage points for the Liberals.
"It's a George Bush issue," says pollster Michael Marzolini, of Pollara Inc. "The Conservatives don't want to seem too close and too non-critical. And the Liberals tend to go overboard in being critical, trying to squeeze NDP voters by appealing to them." Mr. Marzolini expects the election to be the most "volatile" since free trade dominated the election debate in 1998. "The Liberal campaign looks like it's going to be another negative, demonizing one, and the Conservatives are going to be scandal-mongering."
In the last election in 2004, the Conservatives proposed a "made in Canada" foreign policy and vowed to mend fences with the United States, including the appointment of an ambassador in Washington with Cabinet level standing. At the time, Mr. Harper was forced to defend comments he had made a year earlier that suggested he would have backed the U.S. effort to topple Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein -- an unpopular move with the Canadian public. Mr. Harper later claimed that his statement was a call for moral support, not the contribution of military personnel.
This time around, analysts say the Conservatives will be highly critical of the Liberals for poorly defending Canadian interests to the south. Meanwhile, the NDP will say they are troubled by Canada's deep integration with the United States, and vow to promote the nation's distinct identity on the world stage.
http://www.embassymag.ca/html/index.php?display=story&full_path=/2005/november/30/election/
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on December 3, 2005]
Note: http://www.embassymag.c...

After Gomery, I switched allegiance to the NDP. While universal public medical care and other social programs are paramount in my decision to vote, ALL of those concerns come second to electing a government that will 1: keep us out of the Bush War 2: get us out of NAFTA and 3: nurture trade relations with nations that will not give us the shaft as occurred with the softwood problem.
I am surprised at the recent suggestion (I refuse to say promise) by Harper that he would lower the GST (marginally at best). Why not keep the GST and lower INCOME taxes: that way, Canadians will have more money from their incomes to spend but they will still be encouraged by the GST to be thoughtful consumers. Does anyone know if any party has considered this option?
I just discovered this site this week and love reading the articles. It's so informative for Canadians. Thank you!
google "regressive tax"
Lets also remember that it was the Conservatives that screwed up National Health care, gave us the GST to replace the 13 billion dollar manufacturing tax and NAFTA to remove tariffs on the last 20% of Canada's trade with the U.S.
The Liberals and Canada's Corporate Elites that have made money off the screw ups of the Conservatives, destroyed Canada's Military by following the U.S. whims and desires and gave the Provincial Primers the right to spend Health care dollars as they see fit because the Provinces could handle the money better then the Federal Government but have yet to saved any money at all nor improve health care for Canadians Provincially or Nationally.
---
Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.
Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.
Welcome, you will go through all the human emotions reading the articles and the comments posted here that is a for sure.
Most post with the sole intent of creating a clean and on-topic intellectual debate but some that like to remain anonymous and post to bash members and / or non-members purposely posting to incite anger.
Enjoy.
---
Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.
Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.
I love this country. Even the person with whom I had the disagreement over "Liberals = rapists" was reasonable and communicative with me and we found common ground. Only in Canada! Vive la difference.
That in itself is why I would never vote for the man. It's hard to tell if he was just trying to cater to what he was thinking the public wanted to hear or if he realy believes Canada has to suport Bush's rampages. In either case he was wrong. I'm getting tired of politicians using the USA as a referance point in their campaign. We don't need the US as a gauge.
If you had a more critical mind, you might start to wonder just what has been hidden... not all of it is vicious trollery (some of it is very funny) while pointing out the rabid, knee-jerk anti-americanism inherent in many of the comments of the registered users.
In light of trends around the Globe it appears the retrenchment into protectionism is gaining strength and the reality will be better for Nation States which engage in effective management of cross border trade before it exacts further damage.
There is no sense in letting things slide as some suggest after the Softwood decisions have been so uniformly ignored by the USA. They are clearly going to continue to act in their own interests. Why Should the NDP or Canada not reciprocate in kind?
The USA would stand to lose more at a time when it needs other countries. Bush's regime has offerred an opportunity to improve things through their stubborn refusal to engage sensibly.
Get Real like the NDP apparently want to I say!
TNM London
The first fact our American friends should establish is how a President appointed by a couple of Supreme Court judges and for the second time, very likely, by computerized voting machines controlled by special interests, can be in an way considered "democratic" ? Also what the actions of that reprehensible crew do to the reputation of the USA around the world? Apart from ruining the economy and the lives of tens of millions in their own country.
I'm quite happy marking the ballots with an "X", knowing that they can be counted and recounted any number of times, and we'll have some kind of a government the same night.
Which, I hope, will lead to the resignation of some guy by the name of Harper as the leader of whatever name that party will be using at that time.
Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.
<br />
<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/02/chinatorture-051202.html">http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/02/chinatorture-051202.html</a><br />
<br />
Two peas in a pod...(eh)...
This system is, in my humble opinion, representative of Canada; everyone has the right to free speech, but you have to take responsibility for what you say. Unfettered free speech is no good for anyone, in much the same way that unfettered capitalism (or socialism, or anything) is never a good thing. I believe they call this sort of thing "Checks and balances" in some countries.
---
Your mantra has been your opinions are stifled due to their contrary nature, when they are actually stifled for being without perceivable foundation.
<br />
<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/051202/w120240.html">http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/051202/w120240.html</a><br />
<br />
Best trading partners ever for the frozen freaks from the Hate White North (eh)...