First of all, it would require that U.S. citizens effectively surrender their citizenship in the independent constitutional republic founded in 1787. Unlike the USA, which was an organic outgrowth of a political system rooted in Anglo-Saxon laws, customs, traditions, and language, the political entity created through the SPP — in effect, the United States of North America (USNA) — would be a forced three-way marriage of wildly incompatible cultures and political systems.
The U.S. and Mexico are separated by language and have fundamentally incompatible political systems. Canada, riven with linguistic and regional conflicts, is hard-pressed to maintain its own unity, without the additional complications that would arise from an effort to join with the United States and Mexico. Lacking the natural affinities that led the original 13 states to create a constitutional republic, the USNA would likely be held together only through corrupt alliances among ruling elites, backed by undisguised force.
This past March, President Bush met in Cancun, Mexico, with Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canada's newly elected Prime Minister Stephen Harper to discuss the year-old SPP, which was formally inaugurated a year ago in a similar trinational summit in Waco, Texas.
To judge from the official rhetoric emanating from various governmental sources, the SPP is a collection of harmless or even commendable multilateral initiatives. A March 23 White House press release observed: "The SPP will complement, rather than replace, existing bilateral and trilateral fora and working groups that are performing well."
The "working groups" casually referred to in that statement were created at the March 2005 Waco summit to create common policies for the United States, Canada, and Mexico in various economic and security areas. Those groups are already laying the foundation for a European Union-style integration of the SPP member nations.
Though the leaders gathered at Cancun spoke in measured terms in describing this process, President Fox came close to giving away the game. His remarks underscored the demand for a new U.S. law ensuring "safe and respectful migration, respecting the rights of people."
http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_3746.shtml
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 19, 2006]
Note: http://www.thenewameric...

<br />
— The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />
Ed Deak.
We are seeing it done behind closed doors, the media being shut out or purposely covering over or even misleading Canadians, and being conducted by the CCCE and like-minded working groups. There are no citizens groups or true ngo's involved, and most certainly we will not be able to vote on it.
So to Brother J - why do you support things being done outside of the democratic sphere of influence?
---
If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.
<br />
— The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />
<br />
— The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />