United States Of North America

Posted on Wednesday, April 19 at 10:18 by jensonj
First of all, it would require that U.S. citizens effectively surrender their citizenship in the independent constitutional republic founded in 1787. Unlike the USA, which was an organic outgrowth of a political system rooted in Anglo-Saxon laws, customs, traditions, and language, the political entity created through the SPP — in effect, the United States of North America (USNA) — would be a forced three-way marriage of wildly incompatible cultures and political systems. The U.S. and Mexico are separated by language and have fundamentally incompatible political systems. Canada, riven with linguistic and regional conflicts, is hard-pressed to maintain its own unity, without the additional complications that would arise from an effort to join with the United States and Mexico. Lacking the natural affinities that led the original 13 states to create a constitutional republic, the USNA would likely be held together only through corrupt alliances among ruling elites, backed by undisguised force. This past March, President Bush met in Cancun, Mexico, with Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canada's newly elected Prime Minister Stephen Harper to discuss the year-old SPP, which was formally inaugurated a year ago in a similar trinational summit in Waco, Texas. To judge from the official rhetoric emanating from various governmental sources, the SPP is a collection of harmless or even commendable multilateral initiatives. A March 23 White House press release observed: "The SPP will complement, rather than replace, existing bilateral and trilateral fora and working groups that are performing well." The "working groups" casually referred to in that statement were created at the March 2005 Waco summit to create common policies for the United States, Canada, and Mexico in various economic and security areas. Those groups are already laying the foundation for a European Union-style integration of the SPP member nations. Though the leaders gathered at Cancun spoke in measured terms in describing this process, President Fox came close to giving away the game. His remarks underscored the demand for a new U.S. law ensuring "safe and respectful migration, respecting the rights of people." http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_3746.shtml [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 19, 2006]

Note: http://www.thenewameric...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:11 am
    <blockquote>Elitists in the United States, Mexico, and Canada are plotting to merge these three nations into a single regional government similar to the European Union. Lacking the natural affinities that led the original 13 states to create a constitutional republic, the USNA would likely be held together only through corrupt alliances among ruling elites, backed by undisguised force.</blockquote> <p>Hmmm … so what are the “natural affinities” that hold the 25 states of the European Union together? Hardly language! Traditions and customs also vary widely from state to state. Does it come down to the <i>acquis communautaire</i> being the tie that binds? Or is the EU held together only through “corrupt alliances among ruling élites, backed by undisguised force”?<p>---<br>Shatter your ideals upon the rock of Truth.<br />
    <br />
    — The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />

  2. Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:31 am
    I have some very good contacts in Europe and can state, that in spite of the secrecy by governments and propaganda by the same corrupt media we have here, covering up the facts, the EU is in deep trouble, as the rejection of the Constitution by France and Holland have also indicated. A lot of people are very, very unhappy with having been forced to give up their independence.

    Ed Deak.

  3. Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:08 am
    And not to mention the EU got together in the open where everyone could see what was up and more importantly - they got to VOTE ON IT!!

    We are seeing it done behind closed doors, the media being shut out or purposely covering over or even misleading Canadians, and being conducted by the CCCE and like-minded working groups. There are no citizens groups or true ngo's involved, and most certainly we will not be able to vote on it.

    So to Brother J - why do you support things being done outside of the democratic sphere of influence?

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  4. Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:47 pm
    <p>Roy,</p> <p>why do you believe that I support things being done outside of the democratic sphere of influence?</p><p>---<br>Shatter your ideals upon the rock of Truth.<br />
    <br />
    — The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />

  5. Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:54 pm
    <p>Ed,</p> <blockquote> the EU is in deep trouble, as the rejection of the Constitution by France and Holland have also indicated.</blockquote> <p>since I lack knowledgable European contacts, would you elucidate on the deep troubles that are facing the EU? I believe that Spain and Luxembourg held referenda that approved the European Constitution.</p> <blockquote>A lot of people are very, very unhappy with having been forced to give up their independence.</blockquote> <p>Independence in general, or independence in some particular area — e.g. cultural, economic, legal, parliamentary, &c.? <p>---<br>Shatter your ideals upon the rock of Truth.<br />
    <br />
    — The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news