"The data collected for the report is based on seven secret roundtable sessions involving between 21 and 45 people and conducted by CSIS. The participants are politicians, business people, labor leaders and academics from all three countries with equal representation."
The report is entitled "North American Future 2025 Project" and was prepared in collaboration with the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), who were previously instrumental in the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994.
The plan outlines an agenda to unify the three countries into a European Union style power bloc.
Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) documents released under the FOIA show that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under this program to "integrate" and "harmonize" with administrative law in Mexico and Canada, just as has become commonplace within the EU.
The documents contain references to upwards of 13 working groups within an entire organized infrastructure that has drawn from officials within most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/050707proposemerger.htm
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 9, 2007]
Note: http://www.prisonplanet...
Globalists Propose Merger.
Posted on Sunday, July 08 at 12:27 by RuralContributed By
Topic
Article Rating
(0 votes)
Options
Stumble It!Comments
view comments in forum
Page 1
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
---
Dave Ruston
When we scratch the surface, there're always some big business
"associations" behind all of these sleazy deals. To be "competitive". They keep on meeting all over the world discussing how to "compete" against each other.
But, of course, if we mention this obvious, well know and proven fact, we're nothing more that ridiculous "conspiracy theorists".
Ed Deak.
may I offer
Thought is orchestrated by leaders in order to direct popular discontent away from themselves- Diogenes of Vive agrees.
---
"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."
William Blake
The merger was and is still on, to the regret of many millions, who have lost their identities, democracy and self determination. Not to mention the property losses in the Eastern parts to Western monies, depriving the peoples from property ownership. It is called "direct foreign investment" the biggest con job and racket in history.
The French and the Dutch have voted against the EU constitution, fearing the loss of their citizenship rights, but it was accepted by the majority of the parliaments of EU countries, without any referendums. I believe there was a referendum in Spain, where it was accepted.
In two European countries, Norway and Switzerland, public referendums rejected joining the EU, against the still ongoing propaganda by their own governments. The Swiss will never join, regardless what their politicians want and they can't do it without public consent.
Now the EU governments are trying to force the Constitution on the continent.
We'll see how Canadian governments will try to sell the country off in secret deals.
Ed Deak.
hidden in plain sight
Any not getting that have only themselfs to blame there has been no mass rejection ego, acceptance.
This is what critical thought is comprised of
M&P (Moore and Parker): “The ability to think critically is vitally important; in fact our lives depend on it. The way we conduct our lives depends on what we believe to be true – on what claims we accept.”
if this is boring and challenges beliefs, so be it
I see nothing wrong in that
But When little children do harm with their language, we make allowances for their lack of experience. When adults who are physically or mentally impaired do harm with their language, we make allowances for their lack of competence. We make similar allowances for adults who are simply ignorant.
Snip
But when verbal violence is committed by educated and competent adults in positions of responsibility, allowances should (Italicized) not be made
Suzette Haden Elgin
WE'er in in this
---
"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."
William Blake
---
"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."
William Blake
<a href="http://www.mayanmajix.com/UCC_course_4.pdf">http://www.mayanmajix.com/UCC_course_4.pdf</a> Then yes by any means necarry piosion the Banksters, and their lawyers <br />
<br />
But until one undestand the info at the above site the charade' will continue.<br />
<br />
"One reason why the super rich bankers and the super rich people in the world have been able to literally steal the world and subjugate it, and plunder it, and bankrupt it and make chattel property out of most of us is because they know and use the rules of Commercial Law and we don't.<br />
Because we don't know the rules, nor use them, we don't know what the game is. We don't know what to do. We don't know how to invoke our rights, remedies and recourses. We get lost in doing everything under the sun except the one and only thing that is the solution.<br />
No one is going to explain to you what and how all this is happening to you. That is never going to happen. These powers-that-be have not divulged the rules of the game. They can and do get away with complete fraud and steal everything because no one knows what to do about it.<br />
SOLUTION;<br />
Well, what CAN you do about it? YOU NEED TO ISSUE A COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT. You don't have to title it that, but that's what it is. You can assert in your affidavit, "I have never been presented with any sworn affidavits that would provide validity to your assessment. It is my best and considered judgment that no such paperwork or affidavit exists." At the end of this document, you put demands on them. They must be implicit and then you state, "Should you consider my position in error . . ."<br />
You know what they have to do now, don't you? They must come back with an affidavit which rebuts your affidavit point for point, which means they have to provide the paper work with the real assessment, the true bill in commerce, the real sworn affidavits that would make their assessment or claims against you valid.<br />
<p>---<br>"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."<br />
<br />
William Blake<br />
<br />