If they want such wages, they should get out of the judge business. Period !! If the Prime Minister of Canada wants parity with CEO's of major corporations, then he shouldn't be in politics. I disagree with judges asking and getting such huge increases.
(I thought we already had a thread on this topic, but a search didn't find one.)
Article:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1090620611757&call_pageid=968256290204&col=968350116795
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
Quid pro quo best describes the 'judges' request to have funds equal to those that 'installed' them on the bench - after all, the judge may owe them something, but on the other hand, the law firms have an 'insider' and if any of you reading this beleive that the 'insider' is impartial, well, reply directly to me and I will have my 'law firm' set up the sale for the many bridges I have in inventory.
So much for respect for the law, lawyers and judges.
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca