British Tanks Crash Through Jail Walls

Posted on Tuesday, September 20 at 10:31 by jensonj
A Defence Ministry spokesman added he had no information suggesting they were freed as a result of any overt military action. But the spokesman stopped short of denying reports that British tanks crashed through the walls of a jail in Basra to free the two. British Broadcasting Corp. quoted an unidentified Iraqi official in Basra as saying that the two Britons "were driving a civilian car and were dressed in civilian clothes when a shooting took place between them and Iraqi patrols." In a public humiliation, Arab satellite television stations showed pictures of two western men sitting on the floor of the jail building with their hands tied behind their backs. One of the men had a bandage covering most of the top of his head, the other had blood on his clothes. Television commentary identified them only as Britons. The fighting in the oil city of Basra, 540 kilometres south of the capital, erupted after British armour encircled the jail where the two Britons were being held. Demonstrators, apparently angry about the shootings of the policemen, hurled stones and Molotov cocktails at British tanks, and at least two people were killed. During the melee one British soldier could be seen in a photograph scrambling for his life from a burning tank and the rock-throwing mob. Aquil Jabbar, an Iraqi television cameraman who lives across the street from the jail, said about 150 Iraqi prisoners fled as British commandos stormed inside late Monday and rescued their comrades. Press Association, the British news agency, reported that three British soldiers were hurt during the violence, but said none of their injuries was life-threatening, according to Ministry of Defence officials in London. British military officials had declined to comment on reports the two arrested men were soldiers operating undercover wearing Arab civilian clothing, but the Ministry of Defence told Press Association that "two military personnel were detained by Iraqi authorities earlier today." Mohammed al-Waili, the governor of the province, said British raid was "barbaric, savage and irresponsible." "A British force of more than 10 tanks backed by helicopters attacked the central jail and destroyed it. This is an irresponsible act," al-Waili said, adding that the British force had spirited the prisoners away to an unknown location. While the Shiite-dominated south of Iraq, where 8,500 British troops are based, has been far quieter than Sunni regions to the north, Britons have come under increasingly frequent attacks in recent weeks. The British military has reported 96 deaths since the war began in 2003. That compares with the deaths of 1,899 Americans who are stationed nearer the violent insurgent regions around Baghdad and stretching west to the Syrian border. To the north Monday, an estimated three million pilgrims - some carrying signs reading "We welcome martyrdom" - jammed the holy city of Karbala for a major Shiite festival in defiance of insurgent declarations of all-out sectarian war. And an Iraqi court in Baghdad sentenced one of Saddam Hussein's nephews to life in prison for funding the country's violent insurgency and bomb-making after a previously unannounced trial. It was the first known trial of any of the former leader's family. Elsewhere Monday, militants continued bloody attacks, killing 24 police and civilians and wounding 28 others. http://www.canada.com/national/story.html?id=ceb6fc51-fa07-456f-a00c-083d88c20373 More links: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/09/19/utanks.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/09/19/ixportaltop.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4262336.stm http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/09/20/iraq.main/index.html [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 20, 2005]

Note: http://www.canada.com/n... http://www.telegraph.co... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1... http://www.cnn.com/2005...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:36 pm
    How much you wanna bet, that those operatives got caught by the Iraqi Police planting some bombs, that were going to be blamed on insurgents?

  2. Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:12 pm
    It's no bet!

  3. Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:24 pm
    I agree, no bet.

    Iraqis are getting pretty close to a civil war over Shiites killing civillians. More gas for the fire!


    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  4. Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:33 pm
    No, allegedly the undercover commandos were arrested on charges of shooting two Iraqi policemen, witnesses said.

    Unidentified Iraqi official in Basra as saying that the two Britons "were driving a civilian car and were dressed in civilian clothes when a shooting took place between them and Iraqi patrols."

    I thought that the coalitions forces trained and certified the Iraq Police and Military forces? What's the problem then?

    It is starting to remind me of what the U.S. did in Vietnam. They said that they were working with the South Viennese Government but instead were running the show and allowing the Viennese Government to be part of it when it served their purposes.

    So much for a free and democratic Iraq Government.

    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

  5. Wed Sep 21, 2005 2:01 am
    "How much you wanna bet, that those operatives got caught by the Iraqi Police planting some bombs, that were going to be blamed on insurgents?"

    What an idiot. ........On second thought, even you don't really believe what you wrote. Boy, you almost had me believing you were serious for a moment. Jokes on me I guess.

  6. Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:47 am
    >>How much you wanna bet, that those operatives got caught by the Iraqi Police planting some bombs, that were going to be blamed on insurgents?<<

    The anti Semitism, the willingness to glom on to the most preposterous rumor…

    Please explain how starting a civil war is in the British best interest.

    What an idiotic statement.

  7. Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:45 am
    Because the governments of the British and American forces want to prolong the deployment, and thus their control over the region. This is a classic tactic that goes back a long ways through history.
    Since your clearly to fucking stupid to understand reality, I doubt you will ever come to grips with the simple facts. Understand. Before the Shah was installed in Iran, the democratically elected President, Mozidek was not cooperating with BP (British Petroleum) in terms of the amount of Oil Revenue the President wanted to keep for the country its self. BP did not want to give the government (people) of Iran any of the revenue, so British Intelligence with the help of the CIA sponsored, and took part in bombings all accross the country, and had fake newspapers printed prasing the bombings, communism and Mozidek, who in reality was anti-communist and had already kicked them out of the country. But enough of the Iranian the people were fooled by the bombing and propaganda campaign, that they supported the coup that left the Shah of Iran in power.
    Kermit Roosevelt was the CIA operative in charge of that operation. He has written about it and bragged about it on NPR in his old age. These are simple historical facts. Your just to much of a patriotic asshole to accept the reality of the fact that you have been so cleverly fooled.
    You don't want to know this sort of thing, so you block it out.

    PS: once again I am not an anti-semite you fucking loser. By the way, by the technical definition, arabs are also Semites. So Israelis who hate Palestinians are also Anti-Semitic.
    Zionism is not all Jews, no matter how much they say it is. Just like the KKK isnt all white people, as much as they claim to represent them.
    Can't you understand this?

  8. by Patm
    Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:20 am
    Anti-semitism? Where? Usually when someone goes to the trouble to make unsibstantiated claims of bigotry, there's some sort of statement for the mud-slinger to characterize as such. Get with the program!

  9. Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:32 am
    >>Anti-semitism? Where?<<<
    We can start with:

    “Hitler was a zionist pawn. The holocaust was carried out in order to help create the state of israel. That was its purpose.”
    by attack beaver on Saturday, August 27 2005<<

    But don't worry PatM, the consensus here seems to be that it is OK to believe the Jews killed 6 million of their own in order to get a home land. As his loony reasoning (Especially his loony reasoning)on Iraq, all because he is Canadian.

  10. Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:38 am
    once again you fail to make the distinction between Zionists and Jews, further proving what an idiot you are.

  11. Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:47 am
    >> Because the governments of the British and American forces want to prolong the deployment, and thus their control over the region. This is a classic tactic that goes back a long ways through history.<<

    Can you point out the historical precedence for putting your self in the middle of a civil war with the responsibility for keeping the 2 sides separated? No?

    >> Since your clearly to fucking stupid to understand reality,<<<

    LOL! Such a polite people…


    >> BP did not want to give the government (people) of Iran any of the revenue, so British Intelligence with the help of the CIA sponsored, and took part in bombings all accross the country,<<

    Lets assume for a second that that whole enchilada is “true”. Were there British and American troops in Iran with a mandate for keeping the peace and not allowing a shia/sunni civil war? No?

    >> You don't want to know this sort of thing, so you block it out.<<

    Another case of psychological projection.

    >> PS: once again I am not an anti-semite <<

    Yes you are…

    >>you fucking loser<<<

    The fact that you would call me, or anyone else a “fucking loser” is the funniest bit yet.

    >> Zionism is not all Jews, no matter how much they say it is<<<

    So it was the Zionist gypsies and homosexuals that were killed in the gas chambers that you were referring to? The Zionist Lutherans? Have the balls to stand by your bigotry kiddo, You will still be an asshole, but you wont be such a cowardly asshole.

  12. Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:56 am
    So now the war in Iraq is about preventing a civil war? I thought it was WMDs? Or democracy? Can't you Neo-facists make up your mind?

  13. Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:46 pm
    right on " attack beaver ", and to those who are introducing " anti jewish " bs to this topic, it is another form to try and discard the truth, which has been stated ever since the british and americas invaded illegally, that many of these explosions were carried out by american and british agents to create an excuse to stay and control Iraq, to blame the Iranians and Syrians so these american and british thugs could justify their invasion of these 2 other countires, but eh, they got caught, and now the truth will come out.....and keep the anti Semitism out of this, because " attack beaver " has said it right on...and there is no anti semitisn whatsoever in his comments

  14. by avatar Spud
    Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:50 pm
    Attackbeaver is right!



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news