Canada Failing World's Poor, Report Says

Posted on Monday, August 14 at 14:45 by 4Canada
Canada is tied with Switzerland in the middle of this lacklustre pack. Japan — described as the most inward-looking nation in the group — came last. It offers the least aid for its size, does little peacekeeping and welcomes few immigrants. It also imposes high tariffs: Those on rice imports average 900 per cent. Two-thirds of the 21 countries, including Canada, scored slightly higher than in the first index, published in 2003. The ranking is based on a complex mix of data and national policies divided into seven areas — aid, trade, investment, migration, technology, security and environment. The Dutch were average or worse in four of the categories, the report states: "Even the best can do better." http://tinyurl.com/lm3g5 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on August 15, 2006]

Note: http://tinyurl.com/lm3g5

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:15 am
    Canada failing world poor, you say?
    I say Canada is failing CANADA'S poor!


    ---
    We have met the enemy and he is us
    Pogo
    A mind is a fire to be kindled, not a vessel to be filled.
    Plutarch

  2. by RPW
    Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:32 am
    But why is the impression "out there" that we are generous? And why aren't we?

    ---
    "We can have a democracy or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of the few. We cannot have both."
    - Justice Louis Brandeis

  3. by Deacon
    Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:56 am
    The corporate poor are getting all the help they can from Harper and company.

    Too bloody bad for everyone else. :-(

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  4. by RPW
    Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:36 am
    Isn't "corporate" and "poor" a contradiction in terms?

    ---
    "We can have a democracy or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of the few. We cannot have both."
    - Justice Louis Brandeis

  5. Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:23 am
    "Isn't "corporate" and "poor" a contradiction in terms?"
    it may very well be, however corporate welfare IS a recognized term and it is doled out at the expense of the underclasses


    ---
    We have met the enemy and he is us
    Pogo
    A mind is a fire to be kindled, not a vessel to be filled.
    Plutarch

  6. by Deacon
    Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:23 am
    Exactly, the term used back in the 1970's was "corporate welfare bums".

    Business whines and they get their bottle, too damn bad they can't be bothered to clean up after themselves.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  7. by shagya
    Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:56 pm
    I agree with the idea Canadians should be helping their own people first. Our internal problem is related to the managerial self-interest of those who profit from the poverty "industry", the various government busybodies, counsellors, social workers and other "mind worms" who have decided "attitude change" on the part of their "clients" is all that's required...a kind of (un)sympathetic magic which, for too long a time, has been associated with the political left. The influence of the professional politicians and careerists will continue so long as radicals insist on trying to "win over " and "work through" the NDP (and now even the Liberals!). That stuff does not work and never will. Perhaps concentrating effort on programs which might possibily make a difference ( such as a guaranteed annual income ) should be a priority. Change the internal character of own country, AND afterward, opportunities to genuinely assist the "third world" will become self-evident, in my view.

  8. Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:35 pm
    This is all the result of the neoclassical market economic theory, so what's the big suprise ?

    As long as this criminal theory is permitted to be taught exclusively in our universities and governments follow the sick advice of their brainwashed economists, the situation will only get worse. Or as Maggie Thatcher would say: TINA.

    Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  9. Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:32 pm
    To hang some numbers around this issue, a recent survey in Toronto counted the number homeless to be around 5,000 (five thousand) or so.

    The publicised Toronto budget for the homeless is about $220,000,000 (two hundred and twenty million)per year.

    Anybody see anything WRONG with this?

    Would you agree that this is a case of your tax dollars at work (or being squandered, wasted, poured down the drain, etc.)?

    As for foreign aid, there is evidence that most of it winds up in the pockets of the powers-that-be in the "poor countries".

    H.F. Wolff

  10. by Deacon
    Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:46 pm
    I see a great deal wrong with it actually.

    Part of the price a nation pays when it allows companies to maintain head offices here while relocating their production/customer service facilities overseas or to mexico.

    And the more companies using that form of cost reduction, the higher those numbers are going to get.

    Isn't corporate capitalism just such a wonderful thing?

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  11. by shagya
    Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:15 am
    Exactamundo! I should have given some straight forward examples but was in a hurry.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news