A Handy Boost For Certificate

Posted on Friday, November 17 at 09:47 by 4Canada
They have been challenged as unconstitutional before the Supreme Court. (A decision is expected by early next year.) They've been harshly criticized at both Commons and Senate committees. Amnesty International has slammed them as a violation of fundamental human rights. A United Nations working group concluded that they deny suspects a fair trial. Although security certificates have been around in one form or another since 1978 (the current, more robust version dates to 1991), they became controversial only after 9/11. That's when Canadian security forces scooped up, jailed and ordered deported five Muslim men who the government claims are linked to Islamic terrorism. All five have challenged that contention, arguing that if the government thinks they are terrorists it should charge them with a crime and bring them to trial. They also argue that they can't properly defend themselves at security certificate hearings because they can't see the evidence against them. In such cases, the government is allowed to present evidence in secret before a federal court judge. Neither the defendants nor their lawyers are entitled to be present. Nor are they permitted to know the details of the government's case. http://tinyurl.com/yhug7y [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on November 17, 2006]

Note: http://tinyurl.com/yhug7y

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 



    You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.

    Latest Editorials

    more articles »

    Your Voice

    To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

    canadian bloggers | canadian news