Last fall, the Paul Martin Liberals committed them to what was supposed to be a NATO operation, with British and Dutch troops.
The Dutch held a long parliamentary debate and agreed to the deployment but under strict conditions and starting only in September.
The British, as is their wont, made little noise but delayed the deployment nonetheless, to sometime this summer.
But the Canadians said, "Ready, Aye, Ready."
So, a job designed for three contingents is being done by one. And our troops are on their own for "the next few months," in Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor's words.
Some MPs even wondered whether the British and the Dutch would ever come.
"What guarantees do we have that NATO will take over from the Americans?" asked the Bloc's Francine Lalonde. "Is it a sure thing?" asked Claude Bachand. Neither got an answer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_PrintFriendly&c=Article&cid=1144878609715&call_pageid=968256290204'
Note: http://www.thestar.com/...

Thanks for posting it Mary.
As a point of interest, the British have learned to station their troops far away from the Americans because of the number of casualties due to US friendly fire. I thought we would have learned from the first world war about placing out troops under that command of another nation. (It was the British at that time.)
Mike
Winnipeg
---
RickW
And like British before them, no doubt the US will fight terrorism in Afghanistan down to the last drop of canadian blood.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
Why don't you all pack your bags and go help the Afghanis. Or the Taliban would be a better chose for you poeple?
---
27 in the military, 9 tours.