Martinizing Marriage

Posted on Thursday, January 29 at 07:57 by equalmarriage
"Paul Martin wants to evade the issue of gay marriage because he's afraid of the impact on his support at the ballot box," the Bloc Québécois Justice Critic Richard Marceau said today. "To satisfy his thirst for power ... it shows how low they are willing to go to get elected ..."

Martinizing marriage

Note: Martinizing marriage

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Jan 29, 2004 11:14 pm
    Not only is he trying to get around the issue, I think he\'s waiting to see what Bush says about it. He\'ll make his move after the election for sure, both the U.S. and the Canadian elections. If Bush is still in power, he\'ll follow the lead, if not who knows. Let\'s just hope he doesn\'t get elected in Canada.

  2. Thu Jan 29, 2004 11:56 pm
    Martin sure is talking the talk, but he's still walking the Liberal walk. If he doen't take a stand and back his words with deeds, I see a major Liberal upset next election.<p> <p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />"The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  3. Fri Jan 30, 2004 4:49 pm
    Martin is a loser! This is another example of how we live in an oppressive regime! Let same sex people marry, for Christ sakes! What the hell is the worry?

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  4. Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:11 am
    Dave, you know what the worry is, it has nothing to do with the Marriage issue, it\'s the same as the pot issue, if the U.S. aka Bush doesn\'t like it then Martin has to re-think it, at least until after all the elections are over. He\'s just buying some time and we all know he has the money to buy time and anything else he wants!

  5. Fri Feb 27, 2004 7:52 am
    Well Dave the problem is that same-sex marriage is based on a small group of subversives telling the majority of traditional married people that the last 6,000 years of God ordained one man, one woman marriage no longer exists.

    I believe majority rules in this country as well as integrity and morals. Homosexuality as described by Romans 1:26, 27 is a sin for God has not and never will change for he is the same yesterday, today and forever.

    One former Liberal Prime Minister believed and supported traditional marriage. How did this suddenly become racist or wrong? Certainly Canadians have lost their spiritual foundations because the government themselves are immoral.

  6. Fri Feb 27, 2004 8:46 am
    Oppressive is what the homosexuals are doing by forcing a sinful lifestyle that the majority of Canadians do not want. Since when has a bunch of misguided, immoral fools and rogues become the authority on marriage?

    Same-sex marriage is an attack upon the legal and moral historical foundations of civilization. It is the government\'s first priority to protect the rights of traditional marriage as promised by the Parliament of Canada in 1999. But they refused to do this even though it was signed and sealed into law as a binding agreement.

    They failed in their responsibilty to defend the institution of marriage which is criminal according to Canadian law. I guess we can admit that bribery and corruption from homosexual special interest groups had a hand in this. However things are about to change starting with the Martin government.

  7. Thu Mar 11, 2004 4:59 am
    Well the argument that it is against the will of god for gays to marry rears its ugly head again. I still find it ironic that some of the very Christians that claim to spread the love of god can forget to do so when it suits them. Not to mention the history that at one time, catholic and interracial marriages were not granted on the basis that they went against the will of god. Oh yes its true!

    Pursuant to the will of god, I would also like to share this site that I found very funny. Funny, because it is true, these things are outlawed according to the will of god. Enjoy!


    www.godhatesshrimp.com

    ---
    To seek, to learn to explore,
    Ahh yes the human compulsion. Q

  8. Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:04 pm
    I support you and the law of Our Creator is Superior to the Supreme court of Canada.Every citizen has the right to life, liberty and property as a free born, God given right. The Government has usurped our rights and is trying to subvert it. No matter how you term it,Homo sexuality is a sin and the better judgement the people of this country should say no.

  9. Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:10 pm
    I would be very careful whom I blaspheme my friend. Our law is based on the natural law of the Bible and Anglo Saxon common law which is Biblical in its inception. Not English common law as it has been subverted. Its only by Deception our Learned leaders think they are superior in the law which they did not write. Mans law can never supercede the Law of the Creator and if they think it will they are delusional and very misguided. The dark side can be very persuasive.

  10. Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:55 pm
    A NON, you are using religion to make your point.

    Get with the program, religion is for weak minded people that can't make a decision until they get "advice" from their god.

    Religion is a weakness, and in several billion years, when the sun runs out of fuel and you are looking for your god to save you, don't hold your breath.

    Religion has one benefit only, it is a great way to gather support groups for such things as funerals and such.

    Otherwise, use your head and quit listening to voices.

    Make your own decisions. You have a brain, use it.



    ---
    "Arrogance is unacceptable. Do it to my face, and I will react" - Jim Callaghan

  11. Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:04 pm
    Hello,

    'Natural law' is itself a disputed term philosophically. Not to mention, that god’s creation does not always follow this law either. The Gay Penguins at the zoo as an example.

    My problem is also that Anglo Saxon common law is also based on previous legal systems before it, including ancient Greek and Roman law. I do not dispute that the church has had its own law, I only dispute this claim that;

    A) Marriage has been strictly between men and women since the dawn of time. Historically speaking, THIS IS NOT TRUE.

    B) Marriage has been strictly the purview of the Church. The bible has always recommended marriage for its followers yes, but, until the take over of the former Roman Empire by the Roman Catholic Church ‘marriage’ was typically a tribal/government/tax issue.


    Canada is built around respect for the minority and while not specifically separated from the Church in our constitution like the US, we are also not a theocracy. Which is the direction that it would seem you wish to lead us.

    Afghanistan used to be a theocracy, it just wasn't your type of theology, but your theology is the RIGH theology. Of course that’s what they said to themselves too.

  12. Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:00 pm
    Funny how people trash the world and then blame GOD that the world is going to hell.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news