"Paul Martin wants to evade the issue of gay marriage because he's afraid of the impact on his support at the ballot box," the Bloc Québécois Justice Critic Richard Marceau said today. "To satisfy his thirst for power ... it shows how low they are willing to go to get elected ..."
Martinizing marriage
Note: Martinizing marriage
---
Dave Ruston
I believe majority rules in this country as well as integrity and morals. Homosexuality as described by Romans 1:26, 27 is a sin for God has not and never will change for he is the same yesterday, today and forever.
One former Liberal Prime Minister believed and supported traditional marriage. How did this suddenly become racist or wrong? Certainly Canadians have lost their spiritual foundations because the government themselves are immoral.
Same-sex marriage is an attack upon the legal and moral historical foundations of civilization. It is the government\'s first priority to protect the rights of traditional marriage as promised by the Parliament of Canada in 1999. But they refused to do this even though it was signed and sealed into law as a binding agreement.
They failed in their responsibilty to defend the institution of marriage which is criminal according to Canadian law. I guess we can admit that bribery and corruption from homosexual special interest groups had a hand in this. However things are about to change starting with the Martin government.
Pursuant to the will of god, I would also like to share this site that I found very funny. Funny, because it is true, these things are outlawed according to the will of god. Enjoy!
www.godhatesshrimp.com
---
To seek, to learn to explore,
Ahh yes the human compulsion. Q
Get with the program, religion is for weak minded people that can't make a decision until they get "advice" from their god.
Religion is a weakness, and in several billion years, when the sun runs out of fuel and you are looking for your god to save you, don't hold your breath.
Religion has one benefit only, it is a great way to gather support groups for such things as funerals and such.
Otherwise, use your head and quit listening to voices.
Make your own decisions. You have a brain, use it.
---
"Arrogance is unacceptable. Do it to my face, and I will react" - Jim Callaghan
'Natural law' is itself a disputed term philosophically. Not to mention, that god’s creation does not always follow this law either. The Gay Penguins at the zoo as an example.
My problem is also that Anglo Saxon common law is also based on previous legal systems before it, including ancient Greek and Roman law. I do not dispute that the church has had its own law, I only dispute this claim that;
A) Marriage has been strictly between men and women since the dawn of time. Historically speaking, THIS IS NOT TRUE.
B) Marriage has been strictly the purview of the Church. The bible has always recommended marriage for its followers yes, but, until the take over of the former Roman Empire by the Roman Catholic Church ‘marriage’ was typically a tribal/government/tax issue.
Canada is built around respect for the minority and while not specifically separated from the Church in our constitution like the US, we are also not a theocracy. Which is the direction that it would seem you wish to lead us.
Afghanistan used to be a theocracy, it just wasn't your type of theology, but your theology is the RIGH theology. Of course that’s what they said to themselves too.