EXPERIMENTAL WEATHER MODIFICATION BILL FAST TRACKING FOR PASSAGE IN U.S. SENATE & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995, a bill that would allow experimental weather modification by artificial methods and implement a national weather modification policy, does not include agriculture or public oversight, is on the “fast track” to be passed in 2006.
This bill is designed to implement experimental weather modification. The appointed Board of Directors established by this bill does not include any agricultural, water, EPA, or public representatives, and has no provisions for Congressional, State, County, or public oversight of their actions or expenditures.
Weather Modification may adversely impact agricultural crops and water supplies. If the weather is changed in one state, region or county it may have severe consequences in another region, state or county. And who is going to decide the type of weather modification experimentation and who it will benefit or adversely impact?
This experimental weather modification bill will impact residents across the United States not just in California. Many current and ongoing weather modification programs (80 listed by NOAA in 2005), including the one in Wyoming that is designed to increase the snowpack, may be diverting rainwater away from Oklahoma and Texas, two states that are currently fighting fires caused by a lack of rainfall. We have no idea what the unintended consequences of the Wyoming action or other experimental weather modification programs might be now or in the future.
In addition to the experimental weather modification programs listed by NOAA, there are both private and ongoing government sponsored atmospheric testing and heating programs underway in Alaska and across the United States. Alaska Senator Stevens recently received $50 million in funding for Alaska’s atmospheric heating program.
All of these unregulated, private, government, and public weather modification programs, may also have unintended synergistic effects. Senate Bill 517 does not address these issues but intends to implement more experimental weather modification programs without a national debate or public oversight.
Artificial weather modification can impact all of us by reducing water supplies, changing agricultural crop production cycles, reducing crop production, and water availability. Since most experimental weather modification programs use chemicals released into the atmosphere the public could be subjected increasingly toxic or unknown substances that could adversely impact agricultural crops and trees.
Trimethyl Aluminum (TMA) and barium are just two of the toxic chemicals used in recent atmospheric heating and testing programs according to NASA. The Alaska H.A.A.R.P. atmospheric heating program may have the capability of changing the Jet Stream which could also change our weather.
Many private weather modification companies admit that precipitation effects may be positive or negative. Fog dispersal programs, using dry ice, liquid nitrogen, liquid propane or silver iodide may improve visibility while adversely impacting Redwood Trees along the California coast by depriving them of needed water they derive from the fog.
The increasing use of varied chemicals like aluminum (coupled with increasing air pollution), can severely impact tree health by depriving trees of water and nutrients normally absorbed through their root systems.
The December 2005 Popular Science Magazine discussed a plan to use an oil slick to stop hurricanes without noting the adverse environmental impacts of the oil used to cover the ocean.
Popular Science also noted that a private company, Dyn-O-Mat, plans to purchase jets to drop thousands of pounds of a water absorbing chemical powder (unknown substance), into hurricanes to absorb moisture that may dissipate hurricanes. There is no agriculture oversight or public hearings to determine the consequences of this and other actions or to monitor or prevent adverse impacts of this chemical once it falls on the surface of the ocean or on land.
Alaska and other areas across the United States are beginning to feel the impacts of climate change. Enormous changes are being seen in the declining health of native plant and tree communities in many areas across the United States.
NASA noted in an October 2005 newsletter that increasingly persistent contrails are “…trapping warmth in the atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…” NASA goes on to note that: “…Any increase in global cloud cover will contribute to long-term changes in Earth’s climate. Likewise, any change in Earth’s climate may have effects on natural resources…”
Global dimming and the persistent contrails, that produce man-made clouds, may have serious impacts on crop production. A recent corn crop study in Illinois shows that cloud cover reduces corn crop production while direct sunlight increases production. In addition, increasing man-made clouds may reduce the effectiveness of solar panels.
Gil Smolin, an Avian Bird Flu expert, noted on the Ron Owens Show on KGO Radio (January 5, 2006), that the flu was spread more quickly in the winter when there was a “lack of sunlight”. Would man-made clouds be contributing to the lack of sunlight which might cause the Avian Bird flu to spread more quickly at other times of the year? Experimental weather modification programs could also exacerbate this problem by changing climate patterns, increasing man-made cloud cover, and changing our weather and climate patterns.
Senate Bill 517 does not address any of these important issues. Its sole purpose is to establish an experimental weather modification policy without any agriculture or public oversight of private, military, and government programs. Without oversight or public hearings agriculture, our natural resources, and watersheds may be negatively impacted. And who will be responsible to determine the synergistic effects of these programs or pay for unintended disasters created by this experimentation. If these programs change growing seasons and interrupt the pollination process crop losses could be substantial exacerbating economic losses.
Please contact all of your elected local, state and federal officials to stop this bill in its present form. This bill needs to have appropriate agriculture and public oversight, with public hearings included, prior to any more experimental projects. We need a national dialogue on this subject before more experimentation takes place.
For more information please contact:
Rosalind Peterson
Post Office Box 499
Redwood Valley, California 95470
(707) 485-7520
E-Mail: info@californiaskywatch.com
n 1995, she became a certified U.S.D.A. Farm Service Agency Crop Loss Adjustor working in more than ten counties throughout California. Many crop losses throughout the State can be attributed to weather related causes.
Rosalind has a BA degree from Sonoma State University in Environmental Studies & Planning (ENSP), with emphasis on agriculture and crop production.
Rosalind Peterson was born and raised on a working farm in Redwood Valley, California. The weather was the foremost factor in determining whether or not our tree crops produced fruit and nuts.
Between 1989 and 1993 Rosalind worked as an Agricultural Technologist for the Mendocino County Department of Agriculture. After leaving Mendocino County she took a position with the USDA Farm Service Agency as a Program Assistant in Mendocino, Sonoma, and the Salinas County Offices.
The first successful protest rally against U.S. Senate Bill 517 was held in Los Angeles, California on March 23, 2006.
The second successful educational forum and demonstration rally opposing U.S. Senate Bill 517 was held in Phoenix, Arizona on Saturday, April 29, 2006. The Agriculture Defense Coalition is now moving their message east across the United States toward Washington, D.C.
Concerned grassroots citizens are involved in this educational protest movement to protect agriculture from unwise experimental weather modification programs. “We, the people, simply will not accept this reckless experimenting on our weather and are fighting the passage of this bill in order to protect agricultural crop production and our water supplies.”
This story is published at http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=PET20060511&articleId=2423
Note: http://www.globalresear...
Chemtrails
Posted on Friday, May 19 at 07:57 by MiltonContributed By
Topic
Article Rating
(0 votes)
Options
Stumble It!Comments
view comments in forum
Page 1 2
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."<br />
(Albert Einstein)
We in the world are bombarded with so much info that it is easier for most to simply ‘go along’ with rather than speak out.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=chemtrails+%2B+hidden+in+plain+view&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8">http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=chemtrails+%2B+hidden+in+plain+view&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8</a> <br />
<p>---<br>The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.... : Albert Einstein
(heh, I love that quote)
---
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
(Albert Einstein)
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."<br />
(Albert Einstein)
<br />
"Many various chemical compounds have been detected as a result of the spraying - aluminum, barium, cadmium, polymer fibers and others. Many investigators claim to have detected various pathogens along with jet fuel residues and certain components of JP8 fuel are banned poisons.<br />
<br />
The most prevalent adverse health effects due to the spraying are: persistent hacking coughs, upper respiratory and intestinal distress, disorientation, aching joints and muscles, nosebleeds, diarrhea, rashes and itchy skin plus many other, often flu-like, symptoms. Deaths have been reported. Others, including myself, have also experienced a dry metallic taste. Those with a weak immune system appear to be most at risk.<br />
<br />
Some spray days create few immediate health problems - others days are bad - in other words what is being sprayed on that particular day and your own short term sensitivity or reaction to that mixture are the critical factors.<br />
<br />
But what of the longer term? Here (simply as one example) I quote the Alzheimer Society of Canada: "Aluminum is one of several factors scientists are investigating in the search for a cause of Alzheimer Disease." In the meantime The Center For Diseases Control in Atlanta has produced a chart that tracks historical common causes of death. The deaths related to Alzheimer's are now 100 times (that is not percent - but times) the 1979 level when they first started tracking Alzheimer's as a cause of death. Unfortunately I have found no equivalent figures for Canada.<br />
<br />
The aluminum found in chemtrails over Ontario (specifically Espanola) matches the 10-micron aluminum oxide called for in a 1994 patent issued to Hughes Aircraft Company known as 'Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming'. The patent refers to spreading highly reflective materials in the atmosphere to reflect enough incoming sunlight (1 to 2%) to slow rapidly accelerating global warming.<br />
<br />
Another similar patent, #US3899144 was granted to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and it contains schematics of the equipment - "Contrail generation apparatus…" and lists the specific chemical compositions to be used in the proposed spraying. The application was filed in 1974 - yes, seventy-four!"<p>---<br><br />
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."<br />
(Albert Einstein)
<br />
"The debate should not be about whether climate change is or is not anthropogenic. The debate should be about whether climate mitigation or modification should be legalized. Various techniques for mitigating the effects of climate change, such as the spraying of aerosols into the atmosphere from aircraft to reduce the levels of sunlight reaching the earth are openly discussed in the official documents of the IPCC. What is not admitted, and what very large numbers of people throughout the world have concluded, is that mitigation projects of this kind are already being implemented, and on a very large scale. This claim is not being allowed to intrude into the official climate change debate. The result is that the climate change sceptics continue to have the psychological advantage and the ability to put climate change activists and scientists on the defensive. It seems that there are great political and legal obstacles to climate change mitigation being carried out openly, transparently and publicly. The present situation of illegality suits the oil lobbies and their spokesmen very well. They know they can mobilize hysterical mobs whenever they want to, and illegal climate change mitigation is an activity that is very well suited for triggering public hysteria, and for channeling it against ecologists and climate scientists....<br />
<br />
Some critics will say that because governments do not admit that climate change mitigation projects are in progress and because we cannot prove that they are, (since the evidence of our senses is not enough), it is futile to imagine that we can out-manoeuvre the oil lobbies. But this is not true. All that is necessary is for us to argue, and argue persistently, that the question is not whether climate change is a reality or not, or is anthropogenic or not. The question is whether climate change mitigation should be legalized or banned. This places no onus on us to prove that climate change mitigation is actually occurring. But it does allow us to turn the tables on the climate change sceptics and put THEM on the defensive. If we can get them to say that climate change mitigation is a bad idea, we can then demand that they prove climate change mitigation is NOT occurring. If we can get them to say that climate change mitigation should be legalized then we have deprived them of any further ability to argue that climate change is not something that governments should try to influence. And of any ability to argue that climate change is not a problem.",<br />
<br />
you can download the entire pdf format article here <a href="http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/climate-change.pdf">http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/climate-change.pdf</a><p>---<br><br />
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."<br />
(Albert Einstein)
<br />
This method was the most cost effective, and yielded the largest benefits. It could also be conducted covertly to avoid the burdens of environmental protection and regulatory entanglements.<br />
<br />
It is evident to anyone who cares to look up, that this mitigation is now being conducted worldwide and on a daily basis. It is certain that our leaders have already embarked on an immense geoengineering project; one in which they expect millions of human fatalities, and consider these to be acceptable losses." Quote from <a href="http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/smoking_gun.html">http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/smoking_gun.html</a><br />
<br />
Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base (1992)<br />
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy may be read at <a href="http://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309043867/html/index.html">http://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309043867/html/index.html</a><br />
<br />
GEOENGINEERING: A CLIMATE CHANGE MANHATTAN PROJECT<br />
Jay Michaelson <br />
<br />
Copyright © 1998 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University; Jay Michaelson<br />
<br />
"Why are we fiddling while the Earth burns? Though the vast majority of the world's scientific and political communities now agree that some warming of the Earth's climate is occurring as anthropogenic changes take place in the atmosphere, there is *75 equally widespread agreement that our recently renewed efforts to mitigate its consequences are woefully inadequate. Notwithstanding the many proposals, and limited progress toward a binding climate change treaty at the recent Third Conference of the Parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP3) in Kyoto, Japan (hereinafter "Kyoto Conference"), creating effective climate change policy remains "the most difficult negotiation anyone *76 has tried to do." Why?<br />
<br />
This Article argues that the lack of success in climate change policy stems from the exclusive focus of policymakers on various forms of preventive regulation. Because climate change regulation requires an extraordinary amount of will and coordination, and because uncertainty, cost, equity, and other factors threaten the effective implementation of a Kyoto-style program, a regulation-only approach is dangerously myopic. Not even the most austere post-Kyoto regulatory regime can avert a probable temperature rise of 2 to 3 degrees Fahrenheit during the next century, and most observers estimate that more politically feasible plans will yield a rise of between 3 and 8 degrees. Yet other than simply doing nothing and adapting to climate change when it happens--a potentially catastrophic strategy--what alternatives do we have? <br />
<br />
In the wake of Kyoto, the time has now come to expand our policy horizons to include geoengineering, the direct manipulation of the Earth's climatic feedback system, as a serious alternative to ineffective and contentious regulation. Once derided as science fiction, geoengineering has lately begun to merit serious debate in academic, scientific, and econometric literature, *77 and has gained the tentative support of such diverse figures as Edward Teller, Wallace Broecker, William Nordhaus, and Stephen Schneider. <br />
<br />
First, the science of geoengineering--though not the primary focus of this Article--is no longer the arrogant climatologist's Tower of Babel. In particular, two proposals have yielded encouraging scientific data: the oft- maligned "Geritol cure" --sowing iron filings in the ocean to stimulate the growth of carbon-consuming phytoplankton; and the "sunscreen" proposal, which *78 calls for the controlled emission of dust particles to reflect solar radiation and incrementally cool the Earth, simulating the counter-greenhouse "Pinatubo Effect" measured in the wake of Mount Pinatubo's eruption in 1991. "<br />
<br />
This paper may be read in its entirety at <a href="http://www.metatronics.net/lit/geo2.html#two">http://www.metatronics.net/lit/geo2.html#two</a><p>---<br><br />
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."<br />
(Albert Einstein)
But the purpose of this type of "air seeding" is totally different and extremely dangerous due to the long term effects of the pollotion and the fact that at certain elavations, the stuff will just sit there and move around the globe and not be dispersed at all. Until the whole planet will be covered with the insulation material and not only the countries that want it. Are there boundaries in the sky? I believe there are.
This reminds me of the SE/2 decision in British Columbia in the past few months - about a proposed gas fired power station at Sumas, Whatcom County, Washington State, USA, that needed an International Power Line to connect to the BC Hydro grid in Abbotsford BC. The (Canadian) National Energy Board denied the application for the IPL and as a result of that, the whole SE/2 project (which would have polluted the Fraser Valley much more than Whatcom County due to existing weather patterns) is now dead-dead.
Is Canada (in which 90% of the population lives within 200 km of the US border) part of this criminal pollutionary activity?
Thanks Vive, for this information.....
<br />
<a href="http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread7527.html">http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread7527.html</a><p>---<br>The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.... : Albert Einstein
Jacob, good post, I didn't know that the power project was shelved. Yes, Canada is being sprayed on a daily basis and I am told, by folks who live elsewhere, that this is a global activity.
---
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
(Albert Einstein)
<br />
<a href="http://www.barrypenner.com/view_page.php?id=3">http://www.barrypenner.com/view_page.php?id=3</a>
by William Thomas<br />
<br />
A is for Apple.<br />
<br />
B is for Boy.<br />
<br />
C is for Chemtrails.<br />
<br />
At least this is what one American father found while paging through his child's science book. SmT was astonished to find seventh graders being taught about chemtrails. And geoengineeering their home planet.<br />
<br />
Anyone with a question about the "spray programs" he now says, "should perhaps just ask their kids."<br />
<br />
The chemtrails section is found in the Centre Point Learning Science I Essential Interactions science book. Under "Solutions for Global Warming", section 5.19 features a photo of a big multi-engine jet sporting a familiar orange/red paint scheme.<br />
<br />
The caption reads: "Figure 1- Jet engines running on richer fuel would add particles to the atmosphere to create a sunscreen".<br />
<br />
The logo on the plane says: "Particle Air".<br />
<br />
"I kid you not," SmT insists. "Why did I spend all of that time doing research when I could have just asked my kids?"<br />
<br />
Helping habituate children to a life under lethal sunshine and "protective" spray planes, this trippy textbook urges young readers to "Use Sun Block". But its authors are referring to a sunscreen spread across the sky.<br />
<br />
"Could we deliberately add particles to the atmosphere?" asks the text, before helpfully suggesting that "Burning coal adds soot to the air."<br />
<br />
You might be old enough to recoil at such a notion. But in a country where down is up and wrong is right, your kids could be learning that what used to be bad and a bummer is a now good thing!<br />
Read the rest at <a href="http://www.willthomas.net/Chemtrails/Articles/Chemtrails_In_US_Schools.htm">http://www.willthomas.net/Chemtrails/Articles/Chemtrails_In_US_Schools.htm</a><br />
----------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
This is an Australian website which has great pictures of chemtrails and contrails co-existing. I thought I posted the link before but it appears that I didn't anyway here it is<br />
<a href="http://www.gaiaguys.net/Chemtrails.htm">http://www.gaiaguys.net/Chemtrails.htm</a><p>---<br><br />
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."<br />
(Albert Einstein)
I made a conection between chentrails and this new disease that is grabbing ink<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.carnicom.com/micro2.htm">http://www.carnicom.com/micro2.htm</a><br />
for photos<p>---<br>The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.... : Albert Einstein