Witnesses to the killing relate that the extremely agitated man attempted to get off the flight, followed by his wife, who called out that her husband was sick and had not taken his medication. Alpizar’s wife, Anne Buechner, has since said that her husband suffered from bipolar disorder (or manic depression) and had not recently taken his medication.
Passenger Alan Tirpak, 31, who was seated near the front of the aircraft, told the New York Daily News, “He didn’t say anything as far as I could hear.” Tirpak said he heard the man’s wife yelling to the marshals that he was “very sick,” before hearing shots ring out outside the plane’s door.
Another passenger, Mary Gardner, told Associated Press, “I did not hear him say that he had a bomb.” She also said she heard Mrs. Buechner say of her husband, “He’s bipolar. He doesn’t have his medicine.”
The Orlando Sentinel interviewed seven passengers who said Alpizar was silent as he bolted past them. “One thought he had taken the wrong flight. Another thought he was going to throw up,” the Sentinel reported.
Jorge A. Borrelli, an Orlando architect, stated, “I can tell you, he never said a thing in that airplane. He never called out he had a bomb. He never said a word from the point he passed me at Row 9.... He did not say a word to anybody.”
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/dec2005/miam-d10.shtml
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on December 11, 2005]
Note: http://www.wsws.org/art...

Well, I was half right, he was completely innocent. I still reserve judgement on the air-marshals until I learn more; I'm not willing to give them a free pass for every shooting but, you have to give them some benefit of the doubt simply due to the dangers involved.
A week or two more and we should have the full story.
Sorry, I don't believe in fairy tales.
I was reading the Vancouver Sun (CanWest) and they mentioned the British shooting. Now, as everyone in the freaking world knows, the "bulky winter jacket" lie was completely disproven by photographs and video, he was wearing a jean-jacket (Denim) that wasn't even buttoned up. Somehow, CanWest forgot that and this story (Friday I think), says the man was wearing a bulky winter jacket.
Just how freakin' stupid do the Aspers think Canadians are? I know we have the collective attention span of a gnat, but I do think (hope?) that most people will see that article and realize the CanWest is, yet again, reporting the spin, not the facts.
ethical/political restraints of the
Bush administration to engineer, misrepresent
or hype an isolated event in order to
augment the fear climate and facilitate
more dictatorial security measures and
aggressive international meddling.
Perhaps most tragic and sad of all, at least for us here in Canada, is the manner in which our supposedly enlightened and compassionate leaders here at home push us to follow along the same lost road to ignomy and disgrace.
None of these tragedies, as heart wrenching as they may be, is as hard to understand as the fact that we, collectively and willingly follow that road, and reward those who take us there by returning them to power over us.
My poor old dad used to say sheep were the dumbest animals. Surely he was wrong; they just can't be as dumb as people are!
The Republic Book VIII (564E-566C)
"When the Protector of the People finds a very obedient mob; when he will not obstain from shedding tribal blood; when he drags someone into court by the usual unjust accusations, and incurs bloodguilt by destroying the life of a man; when, with unholy mouth and tonue, he tastes a kinsman's gore; when he banises and executes, when he hints at abolition of debts and partition of estates surely for such a one the necessity is ordained that he must either perish at the hands of his enemies, or become a tyrant, and be a wolf instead of a man?"
"At first, in the early days, he greets everyone he meets with a broad smile; says he is no tyant, and promises all sorts of things in private and in public, frees them from debts and parcels out the land to the people and to those about him, pretends to be gracious and friendly to all the world."
"As to outside enemies, when he has made terms with some and destroyed others, I take it, and when all is quiet from that source, he is forever stirring up some war in order that the people may want a leader."
"And moreover, in order that they may become poor by having to pay taxes, and stick to their daily round, and be less likely to plot against him."
Sounds like Bush in alot of ways?
---
Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.
Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.
SHOULD be force-drugged by the state!
Further registered and authorised for being in public!
The dude didn't take his meds
Shoot him on the spot! !
Have the law makers all gone mad?
Have we?
to endure their free reign on us?
OOPS!
A Rhetorical !
ya reep what ya sew! remember this at the polls
(VERY BAD!!!!!)
Oh Hell! extremmely bad!
one mustn't use sarcasm on sheeple
Keepit fresh, Administration.
Dio
---
Your mantra has been your opinions are stifled due to their contrary nature, when they are actually stifled for being without perceivable foundation
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
Certainly not from the book "War and Peace". There is no honor in what we see in the US today. In Viet Nam they used a feeble excuse for the invasion. Who would have thought they (the USA) would do it again with no excuse. Joseph McCarthy would be just a minor in todays Bush league.
"sorry"
a common enough occurence, Sarcasm aside
---
Your mantra has been your opinions are stifled due to their contrary nature, when they are actually stifled for being without perceivable foundation
I feel the same way.
If I were you I just wouldn't take this disrespect any longer. Surely there are other ways you could better spend your time then this thankless task, only to be subjected to bitching and whining from those that you have humbly and graciously endeavored to serve.
Seriously, If doing something good for Canada is the motivation then you are in the wrong place.
---
Your mantra has been your opinions are stifled due to their contrary nature, when they are actually stifled for being without perceivable foundation