Fortunately, the injustice dealt Maher Arar came under judicial review with the Arar commission, Justice Dennis O’ Connor presiding. Even then the government invoked reasons of national security to censor information provided. Much to his credit O’Connor forced the government to reveal even more.
What is revealed is what we suspected all along. While Ottawa bureaucrats slid between their linen sheets at night they indifferently gave up Maher Arar to the CIA knowing full well the evidence against him was questionable and he was going to be tortured and become another victim of “extraordinary rendition.”
It is noteworthy Arar’s Syrian jailers reported to a visiting CSIS agent they considered him more a “nuisance” than an Al Qaeda suspect. Even then he was left to languish in his crypt like cell.
The circumstances surrounding the Arar case are a stunning indictment of the slack ass and incompetent way Ottawa bureaucrats operate. Where they may pass their civil service exams their morality is in the sewer. Clearly, the interests of national security was not invoked to protect the ramparts of the nation but to cover the tracks of their incompetence and wanton indifference to the plight of a wrongfully accused Canadian. The claim of the need for national security has now been degraded to whitewash, yet no resignations, firings or reprimands appear forthcoming.
In the aftermath of 9/11 there was a maniacal vigilante fever to avenge this attack on American soil. There was heavy pressure on Canada and other US allies to help America vent its wrath with blind cooperation leading to what is now corrupted complicity. Revenge has been exacted a thousand times over with the death of thousands of Afghans and Iraqis with the world turned into a much more fretful and insecure place.
There comes a time when balance must return and the rule of law and decency must prevail.
Some very decent US lawyers have been insisting on this for some time now in their five year old fight to defend the legal rights of accused terrorists; Omar Khadr being just one among many. They have exercised courage in doing so as they have been threatened and vilified for doing so. Many have acted on a pro bono basis.
As reported in the August 11th Globe and Mail three of these lawyers, Lt.-CMdr. William Kuebler, Denis Edney, and Lorne Waldman spoke at the convention of the Canadian Bar Association. When Kuebler pointed out to the convention that, “it is inexplicable that Canada has stood by silently while a citizen whose alleged crime was committed while he was still ‘a child’ is being systematically railroaded by a lawless regime,” he received a standing ovation. Denis Edney reported Khadr’s present state as “mentally debilitated,” asking for no more than crayons and paper to color on, and that he is ill and going blind. When asked about the unfairness of his incarceration Khadr simply replied “Canada doesn’t care.”
Waldeman told a subsequent press conference that Omar is no doubt a victim of the “Khadr effect.” Because his family is notoriously associated with Al Qaeda the government and the media shy away from protesting his treatment in captivity.
CBA president Parker MacCarthy referred to Khadr’s treatment as a “travesty of justice” and vowed that the CBA would be aggressively pursuing Khadr’s return to Canada and urged that all Canadians should speak out against this “horrendous lack of due process.”
Waldeman is dead on when he says Omar is suffering from the “Khadr effect.” He suffers guilt by association. But both he and Maher Arar have been victimized by a much more insidious problem and it is quite simply that official Ottawa, both politicians and civil service mandarins are much too willing to pay the Washington Tribute Tax, the WTT.
As this writer has pointed out previously the WTT comes in many forms. It can be anything from selling out the country’s softwood lumber industry, to allowing US enforcement agencies to operate freely within this country and packing guns while they do it. It also comes in the form of North American Union- the subject nobody wants to talk about-and what will be the final levy of the WTT.
In the case of Arar and Khadr the WTT comes in the form of a complete abdication of defending their rights as citizens of Canada and their right to due process.
As a government in abdication, official Ottawa - our peerless politicos and esteemed civil servants- have become acolytes to The Empire as they retreat from governance and anything that resembles moral scruples.
The disgrace is theirs and ours. Theirs for doing nothing and ours for letting them get away with it.
Robert Billyard (c) 2007
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on August 15, 2007]
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
Considering what's been going on, they should give this boy a medal for his heroic actions and send him back home.
Of course the guy that was shot dead was just as much a victim as anyone considering the lies and brainwashing he was subjected to.
Everyone is getting screwed except for those who have been directly responsible for all the violence and hysteria.
Mmmm, no. Omar Khadr has been in solitary confinement. Not pleasant, but he hasn't been bound upside down on a pole and had his feet whipped with electrical cords, like Arar.
"Maher Arar’s crime was essentially to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Khadr, at the age of 15, is alleged to have shot and killed a US medic in an Al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan."
Mmmm, no. Kahdr threw a grenade at US troops. And he did so, on video. Not much alledging there.
"But the US is making the wacky claim that Khadr’s crime was murder."
It is. Kahdr was and still is a Canadian citizen, and under the law, attacking troops of an ally nation is illegal. Since he was not a soldier, it is also 'murder'.
"His rights under the Geneva Conventions are blissfully ignored."
Because he is not a soldier, wears no uniform and has no insignia of rank - he has no rights under the Geneva Conventions. Calling yourself a soldier doesn't count. You must abide by the Geneva Conventions as it pertains to 'uniforms' if you want protections under the Geneva Conventions.
"His age at the time of the alleged crime is also ignored. "
Because they are irrelevant. Had he done what he did in Canada, then they would be.
"This transpires against a back drop where thousands of Afghan and Iraqi civilians have been the victims of indiscriminate US firepower. In wars where civilians have been by far the majority of casualties, one man, Omar Khadr becomes a murderer for killing a US soldier."
Mmm, no. He's just the only one that has been caught red-handed.
"Does it have to be said there is a heinous double standard bordering on insanity at work here?"
What double standard? Maher Arar did nothing. Omar Kahdr did. As I've said before, if he wanted to go to a forgien land and die for a cause, so be it. But he should have renounced his citizenship first, or he will have to deal with the consequences that citizenship's responsibilities come with.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
Well, as a dutiful child, not an adult, he followed his fathers bidding, teachings and beliefs.
So I guess we should do the same and hold peoples children responsible for their parents misguidance and execute them or incarcerate them for life. What age do we start at? Maybe 12 years old should be the age of consent and adult hood? In Manitoba a 7, 8 and 9 year old just recently murdered a 6 year old, without guidance from their parents maybe the age should be lower so as to prevent them from doing this again?
What I do know is this there is no easy answers.
---
Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.
Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.
Who cares about a 15 y/o boy who shoots dead a 20 something hopelessly brainwashed soldier who's acting on a pack of lies? This is a war where lot's of people are expected to die, mostly the innocent.
As I said, give the boy a trinket medal for his heroism and send him home, that's what the US is doing to its soldiers after they kill and maim the innocent.
Let's look at the real criminals, those in high places that are spinning the lies and deceit, who have started two major wars (and the various war crimes that always go along with war), are ordering the imprisonment and torture of people without due process for life, are ordering that individuals be kidnapped and tortured for no good reason, etc.
I agree. I just find that some people who would speak against the use of child soldiers in Africa are sometimes willing to overlook their use by the Taliban. The double standard alarms me.
The status of 'child' changes depending on the protection given to them. If they are sheltered and protected for 18 years, then perhaps that is the gauge for 'adult'. If they are put to work in factories at 8, or given a gun and taught to kill, then they tend to 'grow up' a little faster.
I'm of the opinion that if they act like adults, they should be treated as such.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
Perhaps there are easy answers after all. Rather than attacking the problem from the bottom up look at it from the top down
---
"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."
William Blake
Here is the easy answer!<br />
<a href="http://rense.com/general77/POWERS.HTM">http://rense.com/general77/POWERS.HTM</a> <br />
Until people are willing too look at those who create for profit the wars and misery that come from the actions of these wonderful folks nothing will change Show then the "kindness" they have continued to show us other wise all discussion on the topic is is a giant circle jerk<br />
<br />
Look here for some ideas <br />
<a href="http://www.halexandria.org/dward243.htm">http://www.halexandria.org/dward243.htm</a><br />
<br />
"Justice is fairness, proper conduct, the exercise of authority in the maintenance of right. It includes: uprightness, righteousness, honorableness, honesty, ethicality, morality, probity, principle, conscientiousness, scrupulousness, scruple(s), straightness, squareness, decency, goodness, correctness, virtue, sportsmanship, fair play, lawfulness, rightfulness, equality, equity, equitableness, legitimacy, impartiality, evenhandedness, neutrality, objectivity, law, right, indifference, disinterest, and dispassionateness. Justice is a good thing... supposedly.<br />
<br />
Ultimately, justice is the belief that good overcomes evil. Without justice in some form -- via earthly machinations and/or heavenly interventions -- life seems pointless. What’s the point if the bad guys win out in the end? Why bother with morals or ethics, if they’re no more than a tool for the devious to use against you?"<br />
<br />
<p>---<br>"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."<br />
<br />
William Blake<br />
<br />
And excellent plan. Let's tell this radical that what he did was OK and that we are willing to ignore our own laws, and put him back on our streets. It'll send a strong message to everyone who didn't have the guts to follow through on their 'jihad' ambitions.
"Let's look at the real criminals, those in high places that are spinning the lies and deceit, who have started two major wars (and the various war crimes that always go along with war), are ordering the imprisonment and torture of people without due process for life, are ordering that individuals be kidnapped and tortured for no good reason, etc."
Well, I wouldn't say this fine upstanding citizen is imprisoned for 'no good reason'. The best (probably the only) way to stop the radicals at this point is for the US to give them exactally what Bin Laden wants.
Pull out of the middle east, stop supporting Isreal, stop propping up Islamic dictatorships. Bin Laden has managed to focus many different radical groups because he has a cause. Take that cause away, and let them go back to being in the 10th century.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
I'm confused by your implication that this is not the right thing to do - so why not?
Which radical do you mean, the neocons and their brainwashed followers, or the people of Afghanistan fighting to be free of a foreign occupation?
"Well, I wouldn't say this fine upstanding citizen is imprisoned for 'no good reason'."
The ones that are the real criminals are free for 'no good reason'. If you insist that this boy must be held for trial, than let's see a real trail take place in a real court and away from those who are committing war crimes against Afghanistan. This boy (now a man) is in prison serving a life sentence without due process, probably being tortured, and is held captive by the same gang that attacked him and who he was trying to fight off.
"The best (probably the only) way to stop the radicals at this point is for the US to give them exactally what Bin Laden wants."
I strongly disagree! What Bin Laden may have wanted is of absolutely no relevance to the situation. The US government and its puppets (such as Canada) should simply do the right thing.
Or do you think, just because we have different takes on why we are in Afghanistan that I can't see the bigger picture?
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
<br />
I mean the young Canadian citizen who went to a foreign land to kill our soldiers and die for the wrong cause.<br />
<br />
"f you insist that this boy must be held for trial, than let's see a real trail take place in a real court and away from those who are committing war crimes against Afghanistan."<br />
<br />
I've said it all along. With citizenship comes responsibilities. Bring him to Canada and try him for killing an ally soldier.<br />
<br />
"What Bin Laden may have wanted is of absolutely no relevance to the situation."<br />
<br />
It has a direct relevance. Bin Laden was training these homicidal children to kill us; his goals were quite clear.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,,845725,00.html">http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,,845725,00.html</a><br />
<br />
Text: (edited)<br />
<br />
-----------------------<br />
As for the first question: Why are we fighting and opposing you? The answer is very simple:<br />
<br />
(1) Because you attacked us and continue to attack us.<br />
<br />
(2) The second thing we call you to, is to stop your oppression, lies, immorality and debauchery that has spread among you.<br />
<br />
(3) What we call you to thirdly is to take an honest stance with yourselves - and I doubt you will do so - to discover that you are a nation without principles or manners, and that the values and principles to you are something which you merely demand from others, not that which you yourself must adhere to.<br />
<br />
(4) We also advise you to stop supporting Israel, and to end your support of the Indians in Kashmir, the Russians against the Chechens and to also cease supporting the Manila Government against the Muslims in Southern Philippines.<br />
<br />
(5) We also advise you to pack your luggage and get out of our lands. We desire for your goodness, guidance, and righteousness, so do not force us to send you back as cargo in coffins.<br />
<br />
(6) Sixthly, we call upon you to end your support of the corrupt leaders in our countries. Do not interfere in our politics and method of education. Leave us alone, or else expect us in New York and Washington. <br />
<br />
(7) We also call you to deal with us and interact with us on the basis of mutual interests and benefits, rather than the policies of sub dual, theft and occupation, and not to continue your policy of supporting the Jews because this will result in more disasters for you.<br />
<br />
---------------<br />
<br />
These are the principals that bring the radicals together. Give them what they want, and let them fight amongst themselves.<p>---<br>The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.<br />
You sure are twisting things up. Khadr was only 15 at the time. He did not go to a foreign land to kill our soldiers. He was taken to Afghanistan by his parents. Khadr being a minor had no choice but to leave and travel with his family. Yes he could have run away from home, but that presumes he knew what was going on and was unafraid of running away and had the means to survive had he done so. Khadr is not accused of killing Canadian soldiers, it has been alleged that he killed an American soldier during combat. The soldier who was killed was trained as a medic, but at the time he was actively engaged in combat activities, and that made him a legitimate target during a time of war. The US military is not charging Khadr with murder likely because the man he killed was obviously engaged in combat activities and they cannot prove otherwise.
As for the wrong cause, the evidence strongly suggests that high level elements in the US government were behind the 9/11 attacks. At the very least, we know that Bush and his cronies told everyone that Bin Laden was behind the attacks without offering up a shred of credible proof, and using 9/11 as a flimsy excuse, conducted a full scale invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and later on Iraq.
"I've said it all along. With citizenship comes responsibilities. Bring him to Canada and try him for killing an ally soldier."
I'm certain that the boy in question would be very happy to be moved back to Canada for a fair and impartial trial, and so would I. Being 15 at the time, he'd either be tried as a young offender and set free having already served 6 years under inhumane conditions, or more likely he'd be designated as a prisoner of war and set free.
"It has a direct relevance. Bin Laden was training these homicidal children to kill us; his goals were quite clear."
No one was being trained to kill Canadians. At the time, Bin Laden saw the US as the enemy, not Canada. The only thing that has made us a target is clearly Canada's involvement in the war. All the Canadian's who have been attacked were in Afghanistan as part of the occupation force, thereby making them legitimate targets by the on going insurgency.
What Bin Laden had to say has no relevance because the problem is not with an angry and unreasonable Bin Laden, the problem is with an unjust, hypocritical, lying, mass murdering US government that is creating havoc among the people of the ME and elsewhere. Take away Bin Laden and another one will assume his place to meet the on going and just cause, but take away the cause, and there would be no more Bin Laden and no possibility of successors.
If you are to put the insurgents on trial for their violence, then you must do the very same thing to those who have created the whole mess, otherwise the problem will never go away.
"As for the first question: Why are we fighting and opposing you? The answer is very simple:"
All those points listed are perfectly reasonable. What is unreasonable, are the actions of the US as described on the list.
Yes, he was taken to Afghanistan by his father, to be trained in 'jihad' to kill soldiers.
"Khadr being a minor had no choice but to leave and travel with his family. "
Hmmm, let's look at some Canadian headlines. 12 years olds drown 6 year old in a lake . . .14 years olds lock little girl in a shed, and light shed on fire . . . Reena Virk is killed in a swarming incident . . . Sorry, the 'underage' thing doesn't change the fact that killing people is wrong. 'I was only following orders' is not a defence.
"Yes he could have run away from home, but that presumes he knew what was going on and was unafraid of running away and had the means to survive had he done so. "
No, instead he relished the chance to kill infidels.
"Khadr is not accused of killing Canadian soldiers, it has been alleged that he killed an American soldier during combat."
But, he still was not wearing a uniform, was not a member of any militia or army - and wouldn't care if the soldier were Canadian, German, Korean or American. Participating in such actions is against Canadian law, and he should stand trial for that. I could understand if he were Afghani, then there might be a case for him 'defending his homeland'. But he's a Canadian citizen, born in Pakistan. Too bad, so sad.
"The soldier who was killed was trained as a medic, but at the time he was actively engaged in combat activities, and that made him a legitimate target during a time of war. The US military is not charging Khadr with murder likely because the man he killed was obviously engaged in combat activities and they cannot prove otherwise."
Since medics became targets in war, they have had to have the ability to fight back. Are you suggesting the medic should not have?
"As for the wrong cause, the evidence strongly suggests that high level elements in the US government were behind the 9/11 attacks. At the very least, we know that Bush and his cronies told everyone that Bin Laden was behind the attacks without offering up a shred of credible proof, and using 9/11 as a flimsy excuse, conducted a full scale invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and later on Iraq."
So, if Bin Laden were not responsible, why would he bother to explain 'why we attacked you'?
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.