Senior Military, Intelligence, And Government Critics Of 9/11 Commission Report

Posted on Friday, September 22 at 08:09 by Milton
Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Commanding General of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), 1981 - 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command (ERADCOM) and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career. "One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on? http://www.undersiegemovie.com/media/stubblebine.wmv ...... Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. 34-year Air Force career. "The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. … With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. … As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history." http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm ...... Barbara Honegger – Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, the Navy’s advanced science, technology and national security affairs university (1995 - present). White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to President Ronald Reagan (1981-83). "The US military, not al Qaeda, had the sustained access weeks before 9/11 to also plant controlled demolition charges throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC2, and in WTC7, which brought down all three buildings on 9/11. ... A US military plane, not one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, high speed 270 degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on 9/11 were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their screens. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon’s anti aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break all of its Standard Operating Procedures to paralyze its own emergency response system." http://blog.lege.net/content/Seven_Hours_in_September.pdf ....... Louis Freeh – Director of the FBI, 1993-2001. Former U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, appointed by President George H.W. Bush. Former Deputy United States Attorney in New York. Former officer in the United States Army JAG Corps Reserve. "Even the most junior investigator would immediately know that the name and photo ID of Atta in 2000 is precisely the kind of tactical intelligence the FBI has many times employed to prevent attacks and arrest terrorists. Yet the 9/11 Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically significant." This astounding conclusion--in combination with the failure to investigate Able Danger and incorporate it into its findings--raises serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant itself. … No wonder the 9/11 families were outraged by these revelations and called for a "new" commission to investigate." http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007559 ....... Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development "Star Wars Program" under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover-up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible. … Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney. I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder." http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674 ........................................................................................... Alan has links to essays and videos, ( go to http://patriotsquestion911.com/ ), of these and other people who state that the 911 Commission was either totally inept or guilty of criminal complicity in the events that happened on Sept 11, 2001. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 22, 2006]

Note: http://www.undersiegemo... http://www.physics911.n... http://blog.lege.net/co... http://www.opinionjourn... http://video.google.com... http://patriotsquestion...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:43 am
    Even last, (I think it was) last Sunday Evan Soloman on CBC Newsworld Sunday Report when interviewing Kean asked him about the video "Loose Change" and Kean got all angry saying that everyone expects him to prove things that basically they can't? If you can get video I'm sure that would still be the CBC website. He was mad because he was being asked some "hard" questions. He's a liar and a coveruper.

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  2. by DL
    Sat Sep 23, 2006 5:51 pm
    I saw that interview and agree 4Canada. He seemed rattled and defensive that Evan was asking "detailed and indepth" questions as he called them. He even got huffy and managed to make the fact that Evan had read the report sound like an accusation. Evan pinned him down on the fact that the offical report ignored the spontaneous collapse of building 7. Keen was not allowed to leave it at a "gee I can't recall" response, and had to concede to Evan who was able to say with certainty that he had read the report and no, it wasn't mentioned.

  3. Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:10 pm
    DL,

    The other person that really looked rattled and liaresque was that guy from Popular Mechanics. Someone has paid him to get a falsified bunch of information out into the public, (my read on body language). He was just plain creepy with his desperate attempt to make anyone asking questions into wackos.

    Two things that I can recall that I was disappointed that Evan never took to task were when the, should be UN-popular mechanics man, said the small hole in the Pentagon was on the inside not the outside and they showed a picture but if that was the case why didn't they show the "outside" picture after that to compare what he was talking about?

    Also Evan never touched the stock market activity around AA and UA that I find would lead right to some very guilty parties. And I can't recall if he pointed out the length of time it took the Bush government to actually put an investigation together and that Kean himself may have some good reasons to want the truth to stay buried? I don't think he did.








    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  4. by DL
    Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:52 pm
    Yes 4Canada the Popular Mechanics guy was 24 K sleeze, and in retrospect, it was a disappointment that Evan didn't tear some holes in that jerk. It wouldn't have been too hard and you're right about the Pentagon hole, they should have showed the picture of the front of the building before the fascade fell, that the big plane was supposed to fit through for adequate rebuttal and comparison. He did though state that CBC crew tried but weren't able to get cell phone service in flight when they tried it, so that would get weighed against PM dude's less than convincing assurances. I think if you didn't know a thing about 911 but a lot about human nature (and body language speaks volumes yes) you could spot the liar. I might dare to hope that in a more subtly persuasive way the piece did a good job of showing through demeanor who had more credibiilty. And yes 4Canada, the PM creep reeked of liar for hire.

  5. by Deacon
    Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:16 pm
    Physics and hard science do not lie.

    And right now I think we have some real signs of some high speed sh*t getting close to a very nervous fan.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  6. by DL
    Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:36 am
    True Deacon science does not lie, and it's drawn a line in the sand. You can't get past it. Will desperation lead to another "terrorist" attack to destabalize the masses again? I think that if another attack does occur, there are probably enough people who will not buy into the spin de jour, and protest, and that's when they'll show their hand and start using some of the new rights negating laws they've been squirrelling away for a rainy day, but on their own people this time. Better plug the holes in the Canada-US border double quick. Sigh, I feel as paranoid now as the time I convinced myself they were lying their asses off about WMD. Seriously, I am scared, cause you're right the shit IS poised, and the fan IS on high, and desparate times call for desparate measures and the crazies haven't been big on restraint thus far, and they have had the privledge of unfettered power long enough to like it and expect it to continue.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news