Nafta Trade Talks Likely To Stall: Analysis

Posted on Monday, August 20 at 08:11 by jensonj
Mass demonstrations The mood is very different from the early years of the Bush administration, when the president journeyed to Quebec to push for a Free Trade Area of the Americas, stretching from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego in Argentina and rivalling the EU in size. NAFTA FACTS Started in 1994 Allows free trade between US, Canada and Mexico Trade between partners grew at over 10% per year Side agreements regulate environment, labour Critics say 1m US manufacturing jobs were lost But now the pressure is on Nafta, which accounts for $700bn in cross-border trade and investment, and which Mr Bush has made the cornerstone of a Security and Prosperity Partnership with his two Nafta partners. Thousands of anti-globalisation protesters are expected to converge on the summit at the weekend, although the police have established a 25km security cordon around the site. Union worries All the Democratic presidential candidates condemned the Nafta trade deal as unfair to workers at a rally last week organised by the US trade union federation, the AFL-CIO. Nafta and the way it has been implemented has hurt a lot of US workers Senator Hillary Clinton Even Hillary Clinton, whose husband Bill Clinton played a key role in getting Congress to pass the Nafta deal in 1993, expressed scepticism about whether US workers benefited from free trade deals. "Nafta and the way it has been implemented has hurt a lot of US workers. So clearly we have to have a broad reform in how we approach trade," she told 17,000 union workers at Soldiers Field in Chicago. Full story at BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/business/6940189.stm Published: 2007/08/18 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on August 20, 2007]

Note: http://news.bbc.co.uk/g...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:45 pm
    "The fiercest attacks have come from US Democrats as the 2008 election looms."

    Yeah, until after the 2008 election. If 'elected' (vote fraud and all) they'll be all for it. The same thing happened here in Canada with NAFTA where we saw the Liberals speaking from both sides of their mouths.

  2. Sun Aug 26, 2007 4:34 pm
    The Americans will get what they want. If not now, later. They were willing to rehash the softwood dispute! It still remains in their favour regardless of court rulings. The NAFT "Agreement" merely means they'll say yes "for now". Let it be know that the Americans feel no obligation to any agreement. Canada doesn't care and will still abide by it's own signature.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news