When Terror Is The Foil

Posted on Monday, August 14 at 08:15 by 4Canada
“It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the United States of America ,” President Bush said on Thursday between—what else—campaign stops on behalf of mid-termers. “And that is why we have given our officials the tools they need to protect our people.” He was brandishing his straw men, of course. No one has ever said that there is no threat to the nation. But the moment Bush declared his so-called war on terror, turning the national security state into an instrument of power more far-reaching and unchecked than it ever was during the cold war, the question has always been: threat from whom? And almost from the start, the threat from the Bush administration and its complicit Congress has far outweighed anything terrorists could do, blowing planes out of the sky included. Terrorism is by definition a spectacular one-time event, sometimes serialized, always limited by its very strength: it’s only as effective as its intended target permit it to be. Short of nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists, the downing of planes, the suicide explosions, the hostage-taking is all as immediately disturbing as it is ultimately no more consequential than accidental tragedies that end lives in myriad other ways, but without altering democratic institutions and the constitutional functioning of society. As we now know, as we knew even in 2001 had it not been for the infighting of intelligence agencies and their criminal turf battles, it is also extremely difficult to pull of a spectacular terrorist event. It takes enormous planning and a concurrence of circumstances that hinges almost on lottery-like luck. It takes the somnolent complicity of the very forces designated to prevent those attacks. http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0812-20.htm

Note: http://www.commondreams...

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:02 pm
    <blockquote>It takes enormous planning and a concurrence of circumstances that hinges almost on lottery-like luck.</blockquote> <br><br> It sure takes lot's of 'luck'. The Sept 11, 2001 attacks took out the entire WTC complex with only two planes - that's 7 buildings completely demolished while leaving everything outside the WTC complex untouched. Amazing luck for lucky Larry, who not only got all the insurance money, but did not have to pay for the demolition and removal of the old complex! <br><br> Then there was the Pentagon. The plane managed to fly around all the security measures, anti-aircraft missiles, no interception by military jets, and instead of doing a slam dunk onto the enormous roof, it managed to skim along just a few feet above ground, slamming into the side of the building that was only 77 feet high, hitting the only part of the building that was newly renovated and reinforced and devoid of people. What amazing luck for the Pentagon! <br><br> Finally, with great fortune at hand, Bush and his band of merry neocons got their New Pearl Harbor, and off they went on a never ending war against terror - targeting countries pre-planned for attack well before 2001. <br><br> Then, through another great stroke of luck, the FBI, CIA (and so on), never launched a criminal investigation into the attacks. Bin Laden was instantly declared guilty without evidence, and what evidence there may be has been held back in secrecy. The debris from the WTC attacks were shipped off as scrap before any investigations could even start, and the case was closed. The NIST still has not released their investigation into the collapse of WTC 7. <br><br> What amazing luck for the real attackers.

  2. by DL
    Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:47 pm
    Yes Rearguard endorsing the official fable takes work.

    - Lucky Larry's optimal building fall.
    - The coinciding total collapse of the air defense network at the exact time of the terrorist attack.
    - The suspension of the laws of physics and reality in the area immediately surrounding the Pentagon at the exact time of the attack.
    - The windfall clairvoyance of the Put Option Prophets who sensed a disturbance in the portfolio just in time.

    And please don't point out the invasionary liscense that started in afghanistan and is doesn't expire anywhere short of total coalition control of the Middle East cause it's all about bringing democracy and saving the people when you raise the spectre of the now defunct WMD, and when you point out that not much is happening in the bringing democracy and the saved are truning up bombed and tortured, and raped it's back to the "war on terror", threat of terrorism and 911, 911, 911.... Whiplash anyone?

  3. by hal
    Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:49 am
    I no longer belive there is any such thing as a terrorist, particularly after Beruit.

    Thats a political term equilient to name calling, and you know what they say about sticks and stones, its true. We are not at war with an 'ism' or an 'ist' or any other abstract political euphemism. We are at war with people, motivated mostly by the same thing as us. Need a hint? Do you like Stanley Kubrick? watch the 1st 20 minutes of 2001 Space Odyssey, ya the part with chimps clubbing each other over the same watering hole. In 7 million years we havent changed.

    And zipping ahead in time...heres further great reading for anybody who wants to know who the dirty rascals were that taught the Arabs how to blow things up; The Seven Pillars of Wisdom by T.E.Lawrence.

    Hal, Ottawa



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news