Canada Pours More Into Afghan Reconstruction, But How To Spend It?

Posted on Monday, February 26 at 11:16 by jensonj
"We're not here to make promises," Lt.-Col. Mick Ryan said in a recent presentation to Canadian journalists. "We're here to build things." With Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government poised to pour as much as C$200 million more into Canadian reconstruction in southern Afghanistan, the question of how and where the money will be spent is crucial. Ottawa already puts $100 million per year into this war-ravaged country through civilian agencies, but much of it goes towards long-term good governance and economic initiatives, such as micro-credit financing for Afghans to start their own businesses. Infrastructure investment has amounted to between $6 million and $8 million per year, according to a fact sheet provided by the prime minister's office. The Canadian military by itself only has a small pot of reconstruction money to spend and in the last five months the majority of it has gone into constructing a 4.5-kilometre road through what was the former Taliban stronghold of Panjwaii. If you ask Afghans, especially those in regions torn apart by fighting, what they consider to be the priority, they will tell you infrastructure. "The Canadians are witness in our area," said Shafikhan, who owns land in Pashmul, west of Kandahar, where many a pitched battle was fought last year. "They see our mosques. They are fallen down, destroyed. They see our houses and homes. They see everything by their own eyes. They know our problems. It is up to them what kind of help they do in the future." Canadians have paid for the digging of more than 1,000 wells to help restore irrigation canals and reservoirs. Improvements have been made to dozens of schools, four bridges and a number of roads, according to the handout from the prime minister's office. But much of this has taken place slowly because after asking village elders what they need, the Canadians contract the work out to Afghans, a process the commander of Canadian troops in the country defended. http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/War_Terror/2007/02/25/pf-3665315.html

Note: http://cnews.canoe.ca/C...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:42 am
    War of The Poppies<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.macleans.ca/homepage/magazine/article.jsp?content=20070226_102276_102276">http://www.macleans.ca/homepage/magazine/article.jsp?content=20070226_102276_102276</a>#<br />
    <br />
    Afghanistan's illicit cash crop may be the key to finding peace<br />
    <br />
    Comment:<br />
    Mr. Harper has yet again harangued Parliament over the need to remain in Afghanistan -- now emphasizing reconstruction as key, in addition to the military efforts. Contrary to the Conservative's stand on recreational drugs, does this mean Mr. Harper will recognize the necessity of allowing tacit legalization of the opium poppy, in order to "get the job done"? If so, considering that Heroin is one of more addictive substances on this earth, will he then move to legalize the considerably more benign cannibis sativa, and for exactly the same medicinal reasons given in the Maclean's article?<p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
    -Max Planck<br />
    <br />



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news