Climate Change- The Costs Of Inaction

Posted on Wednesday, October 18 at 10:17 by Ed Deak
The risk of a global catastrophe will increase rapidly as temperatures continue to rise. If nothing is done to slow the process of warming, the grandchildren of today's young adults will inherit a world crippled by food and water shortages, extreme and variable weather, extinctions and other ecosystem damages, and a growing danger of an even more severe catastrophe. The climate system, and our economic activities that affect it, have enormous momentum. It is not possible to wait until the world begins to get uncomfortably warm, and then suddenly decide to stop. Because of its momentum, a supertanker has to turn off its engines 25 km before it comes to a stop. Likewise, we have to achieve a drastic reduction in carbon emissions several decades before we can bring climate change under control. In other words, we have to take action long before we experience the full severity of the problem. The world as a whole can, just barely, cope with the impacts of the first 2° of warming, but only if there are immediate, large-scale, and creative approaches to international equity and cooperation. The challenge will be to understand the near term damages from climate change as a sign of much worse to come if nothing is done to stop it, while interpreting any limited benefits of the early stages of warming as a temporary windfall, soon to disappear. Categorizing climate risks In terms of the predictability of climate risks, the changes in average conditions are wellunderstood and quite predictable: . Higher maximum temperatures and more hot days, higher minimum temperatures and fewer cold days, and a narrower day/night range of temperatures worldwide. . Higher humidity and more intense storms are expected around the world, and in the mid-latitudes, areas away from coastlines can expect increasingly dry summers. Scientists' models of climate change predict not only increases in average temperature, but also increased variability of weather conditions and more extreme events, including more droughts and floods, more heat waves, more powerful storms: iii.. Recent climate change has already made extreme heat waves two to four times more likely, and over the next 40 years, extreme heat events will become 100 times more likely than in the late 20th century. . Climate change is increasing the frequency and intensity of extreme weather, causing a sharp upswing in damages. In 2005, natural catastrophes caused US$220 billion worth of damage worldwide. . In addition to property damages, there are losses of income for months or years after extreme weather events. The U.S. state of Louisiana, the area hardest hit by the extraordinary hurricanes of 2005, suffered a 15 percent loss of income for the post-hurricane months. Lurking beyond the problem of extreme weather events is the risk of a climate catastrophe. . Increasing temperatures raise the probability of collapse, followed by rapid melting, of gigantic ice sheets in Greenland and/or Antarctica, which could cause a devastating sea-level rise. . Even more moderate melting in Greenland and the Arctic could potentially disrupt the circulation of ocean currents in the North Atlantic, which is responsible for the relatively mild temperatures of Northern Europe. . In addition, there is a danger that gradual warming could lead to abrupt releases of large quantities of the methane – a greenhouse gas more powerful than carbon dioxide – that is currently stored in frozen, but quickly thawing, tundra; this would greatly accelerate the process of warming. Table ES1 below summarizes the likely impacts of climate change by an incremental increase in average global temperature. It should be emphasized that all predictions of emissions scenarios and likely temperature changes are estimates, not exact figures. None of the temperatures and effects described in Table ES1 represent precise thresholds or discontinuities; rather, the effects become increasingly likely, and ominous, as temperatures and CO2 levels rise. Three types of benefits from moderate warming have been proposed, all of which are discussed in this report: slightly warmer weather and higher levels of CO2 could increase yields in temperate agriculture; warmer weather could decrease total temperature-related mortality, particularly among the elderly in cold countries; and people in cold countries might simply enjoy life more if it were a little bit warmer. Even if we were to accept the existence of any of these benefits, the complacent conclusion that global warming might not be so bad is still unfounded for at least three reasons: . The effects of variable and extreme weather events are bad for everyone, North and South – and outweigh any potential benefits. . The average effects of even the earliest stages of warming are bad for developing countries. .Beyond 2°, all regions will suffer from the worsening average effects of climate change, along with intensifying extremes and rising risks of catastrophe. iv.Table ES1. http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/rp/Climate-CostsofInaction.pdf

Note: http://ase.tufts.edu/gd...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options





You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news