Imposing Extreme Restraints On What Governments Can Do: TILMA

Posted on Tuesday, February 20 at 11:17 by BC Mary
The Trade, Investment, and Labour Mobility Agreement (TILMA) between Alberta and BC is an unprecedented agreement, imposing extreme constraints on what governments can do. Ottawa-based lawyer and trade expert Steven Shrybman will discuss his recently published legal analysis of TILMA. "The likely impacts of TILMA represent a profound assault on the capacity of present and future governments in BC and Alberta to serve the public interest." - Steven Shrybman March 5, 7:00 - 9:00pm Vancouver Public Library Basement level, Alma Van Dusen and Peter Kay rooms Admission is free and open to the public. For more information, please contact the Council of Canadians, 604.688.8846. Sponsored by: B.C. Government and Service Employees' Union, Check Your Head, the BC Teachers Federation, the Canadian Union of Public Employees BC and the Council of Canadians Steven Shrybman is a lawyer with Sack Goldblatt, Mitchell LLP _______________________________________________ [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 21, 2007]

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:38 pm
    Sorry Mary, but it is not a "trade deal", but a "treaty" to restrict the decision making powers of society.

    The words "Trade agreement" was introduced with the FTA to cover up the treaty aspect, which needs a 2/3 Senate majority in the USA and Reagan didn't expect to get it. It has now been used in every one of these fraudulent deals to give them a phoney legal classification and to mislead the public.

    I think, these secret treaties could be attacked in the courts based on these 2 words alone.

    Ed Deak.

  2. Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:04 pm
    “I think, these secret treaties could be attacked in the courts based on these 2 words alone.”<br />
    <br />
    Sorry to say Ed, you would be wrong,<br />
    which courts do you suppose cases such as these be heard, as there are many such cases?<br />
    <br />
    What will be achieved in the contrived courts of those who took privilege upon themselves?<br />
    <br />
    Even a quick study of law and how law came about will tell any who care to investigate that law as we know it is about property morphed into commerce. These cases operate under commercial code(s) Law, Lex Mercatoria, <a href="http://szabo.best.vwh.net/lex.html">http://szabo.best.vwh.net/lex.html</a> laws separate unto themselves.<br />
    <br />
    The “courts” had their birth in Courts of Royalty <br />
    <br />
    Last time I looked that t’weren’t us <br />
    Please be clear on this point, reader, the courts are NOT there for your benefit!<br />
    Those seeking Justice are looking in the wrong place. <br />
    Authority lies/lays with the sovereign people not with Corporate personhood, well, It did before it was hijacked by subterfuge, blessed by Vatican City and largely ignored by the people.<br />
    <br />
    <p>---<br> [juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]<br />
    <br />
    it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights" <br />
    <br />
    lex ferenda

  3. Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:37 pm
    Good point Ed, you are indeed right, we're talking about a treaty not a trade agreement.

    The play on words goes all the way back to how various "Acts" are written up. We're being suckered with double-speak left right and centre and we have to recognize it as deliberate fraud.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news