California's Governor Impressed By Privatization He Sees In Canada

Posted on Friday, June 08 at 09:19 by jensonj
A 12-mile rail line that will connect Vancouver's waterfront to its airport is one of dozens of ventures like it in Canada. Provinces are turning to private companies to build and operate trains, roads, public hospitals, university facilities — even local schools. "The way they do it is, I think, the right way to go," Schwarzenegger said in an interview. "We don't have to exactly copy it, but we can learn from those ideas." He said that Wall Street is clamoring to invest in private infrastructure projects and that California must examine ways to "benefit from all the private money that is out there." The governor has long championed the sort of large-scale privatization seen in Canada, calling it a solution to bureaucratic inertia and inefficiency in state government. Put services in the hands of the private sector, his argument goes, and the potential for profit will bring a new urgency to providing for the public. But as other governments in North America and elsewhere move swiftly ahead with such plans, Schwarzenegger's privatization campaign is faltering. http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-me-arnold2jun02,0,424540,full.story?coll=la-headlines-politics [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on June 8, 2007]

Note: http://www.latimes.com/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Jun 08, 2007 5:27 pm
    "local leaders jostled one another to praise him as a statesman they could learn from"<br />
    <br />
    What a joke! Look, he's a megalomainiacal bucket of NWO puss, ok? What part of that don't you local leaders get? What are you going to learn from him - bad acting, womanizing or delusion of granduer? Boot licking idiots!<br />
    <br />
    More on this piece of filth: <a href="http://www.arnoldexposed.com/">http://www.arnoldexposed.com/</a>

  2. by Deacon
    Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:07 pm
    And this is surprising how exactly?

    "Privatization" is nothing more than giving away public resources to "business concerns" more interested in harvesting cash than in providing services.

    Who benefits from these actions?

    Corporations, and those who own them.

    Someone tell me how this is a good thing, I could use the laugh.

    ---
    If George W. Bush and Tony Blair are Christian as they've claimed, then pork and shrimp are Kosher.

  3. Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:13 pm
    every polotico that fawned over this Nazi trash should be dumped at the next election they wont be of course


    ---
    "Those who understand Higher Wisdom do not speak in an ordinary manner.
    Those who speak in an ordinary manner do not grasp Higher Knowledge.


    Lao-tzu, Orie

  4. Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:16 pm
    Hey How'd that happen
    wasn't a reply to your post D

    ---
    "Those who understand Higher Wisdom do not speak in an ordinary manner.
    Those who speak in an ordinary manner do not grasp Higher Knowledge.


    Lao-tzu, Orie

  5. Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:58 pm
    I got ya. ;)

  6. by RPW
    Sat Jun 09, 2007 1:59 am
    Now, if these really were private ventures, there's be no public money being input at all. The companies would raise private capital in the marketplace, and carry the costs completely. But no -- none of them want to take that kind of chance in the marketplace. They shout "free enterprise", but then line up at the government trough.............blatant propaganda!<br />
    <br />
    Here's a good example of the result of so-called "privatization":<br />
    <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/06/08/scoc-health-unions.html">http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/06/08/scoc-health-unions.html</a><br />
    I wonder if the government of BC can now be sued for the disruption of a service it was mandated but failed to provide. Or maybe the buggers can be thrown in jail......<br />
    <p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
    -Max Planck<br />
    <br />

  7. Sat Jun 09, 2007 2:25 am
    The reason they have so much trouble getting these terrible P3's off the ground in California is their tough citizen's rights laws. If we had the same laws here that tunnel would have been a public project and on budget and all done with full clear accounting by the public. Instead we get the involvement in the tunnel with a weapons dealer, over budget and done behind closed doors without much scrutiny.

    Give me Arnoldland before that thanks.

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  8. Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:32 pm
    "Democrats — we're not in the business of contracting out state services," said Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez (D-Los Angeles). "It doesn't fit well with our political diet."

    Well, here in Canada the program saves money in the beginning but after a few contracts latter it becomes more expensive then if one had never gone down that road and the government locally or nationally looses control of the services as well as the cost of returning back to running these services again is even more expensive then signing the contract with the service provider.

    There is no cost savings here by a long shot for the public just big profits and business gains for the business elites.

    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news