Jack Layton's Dream Is Realistic

Posted on Monday, May 31 at 08:24 by Jim Callaghan
They said that it is a doable platform, and that the debt will take care of itself as long as Layton pays the interest on the debt every year, and with an expanding market and projected budget surpluses the debt will come down to the 25% of GDP while allowing the government to use the money the Liberals would use to pay down the debt, as Bay St. would like.

So who is supposed to run the country ? Bay St. ? If you're Harper or Martin, the answer is Yes, Bay St. is the god of wealth.

Layton rightfully disagrees, and so do I.

Read the complete article here on the benefits of the Layton platform looking back from 2008.

Balanced budgets, fixed-date elections

Enjoy !!

Note: Balanced budgets, fixed...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon May 31, 2004 3:32 pm
    Sounds good. I like it. So how about scrapping NAFTA and speaking of Canadian sovereignty, as well as using the Bank Of Canada to create money for national projects and programs? So far, so good, Jack.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  2. Mon May 31, 2004 5:23 pm
    Dave,

    Read his book "Speaking Out - Ideas that work for Canadians". I know he isn't talking about the banking system and NAFTA in the media as much as we would like. But in his book he really speaks out about these two issues.

    I'm sure he has his reasons for staying away from the NAFTA and Banking System issues. Give his book a chance. I'm sure you will be as impressed as I was about what he has to say about the banking system and NAFTA.

    Kevin

    ---
    "Love actually, is all around us" --From the movie Love Actually.

  3. by N Say
    Mon May 31, 2004 6:21 pm
    Yeah I was starting to think that Layton was going to do more damage to the progressive movement than the Covservative Party because he come across as so gutless sometimes. People on the news yesterday were saying that the NDP is as "left-wing" as they've ever been, but they're <I>nowhere near</I> as "left-wing" as Trudeau's Liberals were in the 70s. That was a real militant "left-winger". If people want to see the <I>real</I> Canadian left, don't listen to Layton, listen to Hurtig, Orchard, Clarkson, Barlow, Duncan Cameron, etc.<p>---<br>"We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done." - Alan Turing

  4. Mon May 31, 2004 8:10 pm
    Well it is my understanding that Layton himself has listened to Hurtig, so there is a pretty good endorsement, as far as I'm concerned.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  5. Mon May 31, 2004 8:58 pm
    Kevin, you are right on. Jack Layton is in the position of putting forth a platform but not talking about NAFTA and monetary reform.

    This is on purpose, so he gets more votes from the centre-right.

    I wish he could do better, but projections say he will only get some 22 seats, and that is almost minimum for holding the balance of power in a minority government.

    If that doesn't work out, think of the Bloc as the balance of power, or even worse, think about the liberals and conservatives working together, whichever holds the balance of power.

    Now, that's scary !!



    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  6. by N Say
    Mon May 31, 2004 9:37 pm
    no I think Bloc Alberta & Bloc Quebecois would be the worst-case scenario. :-\

    ---
    "We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done." - Alan Turing

  7. Tue Jun 01, 2004 1:23 pm
    I don`t know, I think he`d do well to spell out the dangers of NAFTA and it`s chapter 11 and the energy clause to Canadians. When I tell my fellow Canadians of this they get quite angry knowing that the Liberals and Conservatives are the architects and supporters of such a treasonous 'trade agreement.' Not all Canadians know about the REAL dangers of NAFTA. Many think that it actually is a 'good agreement designed to give Canada access to the US market.' And of course the media NEVER talks about the dangers of NAFTA. So I think it would do Jack well to expose it for what it really is!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  8. Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:11 pm
    If he tried, he'd get buried in the media for being anti-american. Look how bad he got stomped because a candidate in Montreal used to be a Bloc member. Three days he got dragged through the media, and only because of a Liberal innuendo.<p> If he came out against NAFTA, the Conservatives and Liberals would stomp him back to the stone age. Campaign politics has nothing to do with facts, only 5 second sound bites on the 6 O'clock news. Canadians attention spans are too short.<p> Did you see "Sunday" on CBC this week? People actually thought that the leader of the Conservatives was Peter Parker.<p><p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />
    "The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  9. by L. Ray
    Tue Jun 01, 2004 7:10 pm
    Oh come on! It was that spoof in the confessional.

  10. Wed Jun 02, 2004 5:25 pm
    Well you know Peter Parker did have an alter ego, and I think Martin and Harper are both trying to keep theirs in check, so maybe they weren't really wrong???That is what is so refreshing about Jack Layton, he seems real, no ego problems that I see.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news