Revision Or No Vision?

No identifiable part of any of the four airplanes has been produced and entered into evidence. The NTSB did not reconstruct the airplanes. These airplanes were not regularly scheduled flights and none of the pre-flight maintenance documents have been shown to exist. The airplanes were not listed as destroyed in a timely manner.

The passenger lists did not show the hijackers as being on board. Put another way, all the people on the passenger lists were verified as being passengers and not hijackers. A number of the hijackers on the official list came forward and protested their innocence and that rumours of their death’s had been greatly exaggerated. No mention of this or correction to the official theory has been made.

NORAD did not defend the airspace. They changed the official story about what they did do a number of times.

Claims were made by White House gang members that there were no war games on Sept 11, 2001. The fact is that at least 5 war games were going on and one of these games specifically involved a “flying planes into buildings” scenario. White House gang members also said that they had never thought of the possibility of kamikaze airplane attacks. Yet during June of 2001, at the G8 meeting in Italy, President Bush slept on an aircraft carrier because they were worried that someone might crash an airplane into the Hotel he would be staying at. The point of this paragraph is to show that lies were told over and over and there has been no follow up by legal officials.

FEMA set up shop on the docks in NY city on Sept 10th, 2001 and were ready to go on Sept 11, 2001. How did they know to do that.

The media broadcast official appeals for anyone with film or videotape of the attacks to turn in these to the authorities. Minutes after the Pentagon attack FBI agents were confiscating tapes from private business security cameras which might have captured the event. They have yet to release these tapes for the public to see. How a plane the size of a Boeing 757 could have disappeared into the entry hole made in the Pentagon has been studiously obfuscated.

The mayor of New York ordered the removal and destruction of the evidence remaining at the WTC crime site. This man was a lawyer and a prosecutor who therefore knew that removal and destruction of evidence at a crime scene was against the law and yet he went ahead and ordered it done anyway. There was no outcry to stop this from the US justice system.

The media has engaged in a cover up of evidence concerning what actually took place on Sept 11, 2001.

If the fires inside the WTC buildings were so hot that they caused the steel to lose structural stability from the top to the bottom of these buildings then why was there so much paper injected into the air each time a building was imploded? Why wasn't the paper consumed in the raging infernos which were so hot that they caused the steel to fail?

If the fire inside the Pentagon was so hot that the plane vaporized why is there wooden and plastic office furniture visible beside the spots where the plane supposedly vaporized?

The investigation into possible motives yielded one motive. The official motive was that the terrorists hated US rights and freedoms. There were also motives that were not mentioned.

An announcement was made on Sept. 10, 2001 that the US Armed Forces were unable to account for 2.3 Trillion dollars of budget expenditures. An audit was under way and the 911 operations conveniently destroyed Building 7 which was said to hold the armed services accounting records. The section of the Pentagon which was destroyed contained the offices of the auditors who were trying to piece together what had happened to the missing money. Many of the auditors were killed and their research papers were destroyed. The events of 911 terminated the audit forever.

There were hundreds of SEC cases of an Enron scale which were being investigated. All the documents and evidence was said to be stored in building 7 and it was all destroyed when this building, which was not hit by an airplane , imploded.

Asbestos had been used in the construction of the World Trade Towers. The owners were required by law to remove the asbestos by 2007. The cost of doing this safely would have run into many billions of dollars.

PNAC had written a document which called for a "Pearl Harbor" event as a catalyst to destructure the democratic institutions that "terrorists hate".

Eye witness accounts of explosions were locked away and no mention was made of them.

Note: Exposing the truth there is no evidence th... identifiable part passenger lists hijackers A number of the hijacke... war games on Sept 11, 2001 at least 5 war games one of these games “flying planes into bui... How a plane the size of... entry hole made in the... media cover up Eye witness accounts