Hostility To UN Linked To Restraint It Imposes On U.S.

Posted on Wednesday, January 03 at 13:36 by 4Canada
A key goal of the Bush administration, with which the Harper government has co-operated, has been to downplay the significance of the United Nations, where U.S. power is sometimes challenged, and expand the role of NATO, the Western military alliance long dominated by Washington. To justify this move, there's been a concerted effort on the part of the Bush administration and right-wing commentators to undermine the legitimacy of the United Nations. This campaign has involved portraying the UN as hopelessly ineffective, pointing to its inability, for instance, to stop the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. But the UN is only as effective as its members allow it to be. The tiny UN force in Rwanda, led by Canadian general Roméo Dallaire, called out desperately for additional troops and the right to intervene to protect civilians, but the UN Security Council declined to act on the requests. http://www.thestar.com/article/166537 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 4, 2007]

Note: http://www.thestar.com/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:48 am
    Headline should read as:

    "U.S.'s Hostility To UN Linked To Restraint It Imposes On U.S."

    Given that there's almost no UN restraint imposed on the U.S. as it is, the U.S.'s complaints amount to a complaint that it is not yet fully running the UN unilaterally.

    As it is, the UN is already being viewed as a tool of U.S. emperialism, and as a result the UN is seeing growing hostility and loss of respect in general from the world at large.

  2. Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:05 pm
    NATO was formed to oppose the USSR. So what is the reason for its present role?

    The problem with any organization is that sooner, or later, it becomes the toy of inner circles and special interests.

    I have soft spot for the UN, as it saved my life when it outlawed forced repatriations in 1945, but that was long ago, when it was still new and full of hope, long before "wealth creating market conomics"

    Ed Deak

  3. Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:28 pm
    Don't worry, soon the American Armed Forces will come under the control of the communist controlled UN and the US citizens will be forced to turn in their firearms. We'll be next, of course.

  4. by Deacon
    Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:16 am
    No Chris, long before we get jail raped by the evil "communists", we will have had many years of servitude to so-called "capitalists" who have the ability to buy the UN roughly a million times over and who are currently laughing at people who actually believe that there is a difference between the leaders of the Left and the Right.

    For your information, the super rich own them BOTH.


    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  5. Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:50 am
    Don't worry, soon the American Armed Forces will come under the control of the communist controlled UN and the US citizens will be forced to turn in their firearms. We'll be next, of course<<

    Communist? I thought Bush was a Republican. He not only endorses an armed citizenry, he sends them out all over the world. He even insured that the American representative to the UN, was one who despised it. The Americans even attempted to change the statutes of the UN to their liking upon threat of not paying their long overdue Membership fees. The Americans doublecrossed the UN by invading Iraq and then demanded financial support to pay for the damage..

    Actualy, I prefer your version.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  6. Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:25 am
    "... who are currently laughing at people who actually believe that there is a difference between the leaders of the Left and the Right." <br><br> They own the middle as well. <br><br> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_your_base_are_belong_to_us">All your base are belong to us</a>

  7. by Deacon
    Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:55 am
    Take off every zig!

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  8. Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:36 am
    Somebody set up us the bomb!

  9. Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:41 pm
    The UN is a tool of China as well. The Chinese are exploiting their Security Council membership to veto everything to do with Darfur. 400,000 dead. The UN is impotent and the Sudan conflict will spread... this year it will involve Chad as well.

    Will Linda write about that as well I wonder? How will she lay the blame for Darfur at the feet of the US?

  10. Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:58 pm
    "Will Linda write about that as well I wonder? How will she lay the blame for Darfur at the feet of the US?"

    It is common knowledge that the US is waging a war in Somalia via proxy.

  11. Fri Jan 05, 2007 7:31 pm
    And what does Somalia have to do with Darfur? Darfur is the Sudan, Rearguard.

  12. by RPW
    Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:17 am
    <a href="http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://www.africainformation.net/africamapnew.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.africainformation.net/africamapnew2.htm&h=440&w=440&sz=16&tbnid=i8F-AbyHSL8C-M:&tbnh=127&tbnw=127&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dafrica%2Bmap&start=2&sa=X&oi=images&ct=image&cd=2">http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://www.africainformation.net/africamapnew.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.africainformation.net/africamapnew2.htm&h=440&w=440&sz=16&tbnid=i8F-AbyHSL8C-M:&tbnh=127&tbnw=127&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dafrica%2Bmap&start=2&sa=X&oi=images&ct=image&cd=2</a><br />
    <br />
    Sudan next to Ethiopia. Ethiopian troops in Somalia. Easy link.<p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
    -Max Planck<br />
    <br />

  13. Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:05 pm
    Ethiopia is in Somalia. Darfur is in Sudan. That Ethiopia borders on Sudan has nothing to with the genocide in Darfur. Especially since the war in the Sudan is on the other side of the country - toward Chad. And the Sudan military is supported by China. Not Ethiopia, not the US.

    Not every bad thing in this world is the fault or the responsibility of the US no matter how you try to spin it.

  14. Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:47 am
    There's oil in the Sudan and in Somolia that the US wants for itself and if denied access will make sure that no one gets it, such as the Chinese.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news