GPS And Privacy

Posted on Sunday, January 28 at 11:40 by jensonj
Trackers small enough to be hidden on bicycles are being used to catch bike thieves. GPS, short for global positioning system, is based on a series of satellites that ring the globe, sending out signals indicating their position. GPS receivers, now small enough to build into cellphones and other tiny gadgets, compare the signals from several of these satellites to triangulate their position. If the receiver is moving, it can also calculate its heading and speed. Whether you are a parent who wants to track your teenager when they're out for the night in the family car, a person calling for an ambulance on a GPS-equipped cellphone, or a business seeking more operational efficiency, it is easy to see how knowing a person's precise location provides many advantages. For example, knowing the location of your teenaged daughter is a good thing in case she has car trouble or is involved in an accident. But consider the other side of the coin: Are the details about her movements secure? In other words, is there any guarantee that someone within the GPS service company won't use that information for evil or illegal purposes, or that a hacker can't access the system? And no one can argue that being easily located when you call 911 from a GPS-equipped cellphone is of great benefit. But how long does the GPS provider keep the log of those movements, and what's the data being used for the rest of the time? There are many questions that arise when people start leaving GPS trails behind wherever they go. Can the information be used to investigate your daily routines, or by others who want to track your movements without your direct permission? Is a marketing company able to purchase the data to try and discern your buying habits so they can fine-tune their sales pitches? http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/tech/gps-privacy.html [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 29, 2007]

Note: http://www.cbc.ca/news/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by Deacon
    Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:32 pm
    You think that's bad, just take a look at what else they can do:<br />
    <br />
    How does someone being able to remotely activate your cell without your knowledge and listen in to what you're doing grab you?<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1029_3-6140191.html">http://news.com.com/2100-1029_3-6140191.html</a><p>---<br>"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"<br />
    <br />
    "The Weapon" - Rush

  2. Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:39 pm
    There is no control over technology. The more controls are to be implemented, the more the technology to avoid it. No one seems to mind going on Google Earth and zooming in on those photographs. Has anyone contemplated that they may be only permited to see a trivial collection. Why can a person zoom in closer on some locations yet only a fuzzy veiw of others?

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  3. Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:38 am
    This is basically the same situation as when the printed word, promoted to read the Bible, started to challenge religion. The same happened with every new technical gimmick when it got into the hands of the general public and the ruling classes had to scramble to stay ahead.

    Computers are the best example, breaking down the control of information, the strongest weapon ruling classes always had to maintain their powers.

    I have to admit that I have no idea what this technology is about and definitely will never buy it, as I have no use for it, but I look at it as just another input of energy into life, that will cause equal reactions to its benefits.

    There ain't no "win=win", only "win=lose/pay."

    I wonder, how long it will take humanity to learn this simple fact?

    Ed Deak.

  4. by RPW
    Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:48 am
    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_State">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_State</a><p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
    -Max Planck<br />
    <br />

  5. Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:10 am
    "Computers are the best example, breaking down the control of information"

    But is it really, Ed? Are we really getting direct and uncontrolled information? I tried finding "recent" information on the Canadian lad (Omar Khadr) in the American/Cuban prison camp (Guantanamo Bay). Is he dead or alive? Obviously the net also relies on the news media as well. Is Google or Yahoo uncontroled?

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  6. Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:19 am
    A very good movie and one to make a person wonder if it could be for real. Perhaps it can now.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  7. Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:57 pm
    I should have said "uncontrolled, fast exchange of information". At least for the time being. There was no such thing 20 or 50 years ago, except in snail mail.

    When we fought the MAI in 1997, it was killed by the Net and one of the Canadian negotiators, Sylvia Crystal screamed in despair "Is there no way to stop these people?"

    Off to town.........

    Ed Deak.

  8. Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:27 pm
    <a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/28/2020203">http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/28/2020203</a><br />
    <p>---<br>"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden<br />

  9. by Deacon
    Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:43 pm
    Why doesn't anyone seem to care that their new cell phones can be used as bugging devices at will by Big Brother types? Or that this combined with GPS also gives them the ultimate personal tracking device that can not only be used to track where you are, but what also you said if you ever happen to be unfortunate enough to be either a "person of interest" or the relative,friend, co-worker, or acquaintance of one.

    Am I the only one here who sees it?


    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  10. Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:00 pm
    "Why doesn't anyone seem to care that their new cell phones can be used as bugging devices at will by Big Brother types?"

    Because we can just turn them *off*. Or take out the batteries. Or put them in a faraday cage. Or not buy one with GPS capabilities.

    Cell phones are totally optional. Now, if you told me that RFID implants were to become manditory . . .

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  11. Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:05 pm
    On the otherhand, I've always wondered why my land on Vancouver island is so much clearer then even most towns and cities. It's one of the few large chunks of land in private ownership and could be possible, I am suspect of a grow up.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  12. Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:18 pm
    Am I the only one here who sees it?<,

    The artical was posted because others do see it.
    Even your SIN is no longer private nor used only for what it was intended. Yet, how many people have given it out when applying for credit or other demands on it? When you apply for a passport, how would the authority be able to authenticate your information? We are all labeled and now we can be personalized when needed.


    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  13. by Deacon
    Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:22 pm
    "Because we can just turn them *off*. Or take out the batteries. Or put them in a faraday cage. Or not buy one with GPS capabilities."

    Many of the new ones will only allow standby mode, and not true "off"

    Batteries: good unless you actually use your phone during the day.

    And buying a phone without GPS capabilities may not be an option in 2 years.

    Faraday cage: If you want to be reached, won't work as a Faraday grounds out signal.

    My preferred option: don't have one if you can avoid it, or second best: use an old analogue phone IF the service permits it. In my case: I have an old analogue phone with hard off, so when it's off it is really off. And I'll keep one using it until I am no longer allowed to do by the carrier.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  14. Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:28 pm
    There was no such thing 20 or 50 years ago, except in snail mail.<<

    So true. We could even watch "Desert Storm" live on CNN. The old black and white movies shot during WWII were shown days if not weeks later. Same with the weekly paper. News was certainly not immediate but probably just as accurate as today. Which isn't saying much.


    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news