==============
U.S. complied with international trade law in Canada lumber dispute, WTO rules
GENEVA (AP) - The WTO ruled that the United States complied with international law in its calculation of tariffs against Canadian lumber imports, according to a report made public Monday. Canada argued the United States artificially inflated antidumping rates by using a different calculation method to avoid complying with an earlier World Trade Organization decision.
But a WTO panel, which originally released its findings to the parties in February, said that the U.S. had not broken trade rules in its calculation of the duties.
"We therefore consider that the United States has implemented the recommendations and rulings," the ruling concluded. "The United States did not act inconsistently with its obligations under the asserted WTO agreements."
Washington imposed antidumping and countervailing duties totaling more than 27 percent in May 2002 after accusing Canada of subsidizing its lumber industry.
The U.S. Commerce Department, responding to a complaint under the North American Free Trade Agreement, reduced punitive duties late last year from an average of 16 percent to less than 9 percent. Separate antidumping tariffs averaging about 4 percent were not affected. U.S. officials took the action under protest and have not ruled out an appeal before a special NAFTA dispute panel. Canada has argued the NAFTA ruling should supersede the WTO.
Most U.S. timber is harvested from private land at market prices, while in Canada, the government owns 90 percent of timberlands and charges fees for logging. The fee is based on the cost of maintaining and restoring the forest.
The decades-long dispute has fueled talk of an outright trade war between the world's largest trading partners and concerns that the rules of free trade under the North American Free Trade Agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico were now unraveling. Canada supplies about one-third of the U.S. market for softwood, easily sawed pine, spruce and other wood used in home-building. Canada insists the forest policies of lumber-producing provinces may not mirror U.S. free markets in timber but they don't amount to subsidies.
http://www.woai.com/news/national/story.aspx?content_id=E2E55217-5460-4D06-A27D-55C64E4EC983
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 9, 2006]
Note: http://www.wto.org/engl...
http://www.wto.org/engl...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/...
http://jurist.law.pitt....
http://www.woai.com/new...

That is this week as if it made any difference. The only way Harper and Bush would make up the mind for the timper corporations, is when they decide how Canada will cater to the US on other issues. Perhaps a little terrorist hunting in Iran to break the tension or oil for sap program. We'll take the sap if you give us the oil.
The whole thing is nonsense and will only be resolved when the lumber barons get enough profit.
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
No wonder, see-saws are made from softwood lumber planks.
Now what?
If, as I recall, in the US the corporations own forested lands that they got for a song, then what is the real difference?
Isn't buying the resource from the government for a pitance just another form of subsidy?
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
1. The Canadian government owns very little forest lands except in National Parks. The forests are largely owned by provincial governments.
2. Even provinces in which most of forest land is privately owned dumping fees still apply (I am not sure they are as high but they still apply). This suggests that the reasons that the trade barriers are in place is either to artifically inflate the price for an inefficient industry or as a cash grab by the US government.
3. The US argument is ideological and the fact that the WTO would accept it on ideological grounds reflects the bias of the organization.
That still don't explain why logs are okay but lumber isn't. The mills are by no means, susbsidized. If it were so, there would still be many in existance. Many can't compete with the Americans. Seems odd that the American mills can do well buying Canadian timber and localy they can't afford it.
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
Without these contradictions sold as sciences, or divine orders, no ideology, or religion, could survive five minutes.
The Americans know that all levels of Canadian governments are their soul mates, in the service of multinationals, with their policies sanctified by universities, they all support the WTO and NAFTA and so they can get away with anything.
All they have to do is whistle and Canada will come running with wagging tail, to roll over on command.
Ed Deak.
Have you ever driven Interstate 5 from BC down to California?
I did a few years ago, and the amount of clear cut land I saw during one portion of the trip astonished me.
Why?
Because the land was INSIDE a park.
I saw zero evidence of any reforestation, but I did see a sign announcing the presence of a large US forest company.
Funny, I thought reforestation required the planting of trees, not signage.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
The US will get the new NAFTA agreement that they have been after and Canada and Canadians will pay the price in jobs, money and sovereignty.
I have about given up. Just when Canada starts to stand up on its own another government party gives it all away and we become followers instead of leaders and owners of our own destiny.
---
Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.
Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.
According to Harper, Martin had to just merely pick up the phone and talk to Bush to solve the dispute. Perhaps Harper lost the number to the White House. (White house, what an oxymoron)
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
Wilkins also indicated that Canada was finally on the right path for the 21st century. Is that to say that their PNAC agreement with Harper will finally see the light of day?
---
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche