Will Harper And Ignatieff Fianlly Abandon George Bush's Philosophy,...

Posted on Thursday, November 09 at 08:43 by 4Canada
The election was more than a referendum on a president operating above the law and presiding over financial and moral corruption, cronyism and excessive political partisanship at the expense of the common good. It was more than a referendum on Iraq, where the U.S. — much like the military junta in Algeria in the 1990s — is a party to or an accomplice in anarchy and mass killings. The entire gamut of Bush's policies stand repudiated: The war on terror, which has increased terrorism and diluted the most fundamental principles of American democracy, with warrant-less wiretaps on residents, secret CIA prisons, detention of hundreds without charge, and the use of torture. The war in Afghanistan, which is going nowhere. The blind support of Israel's own "war on terror," which is making Israelis less safe, while starving and punishing all Palestinians and killing and injuring too many. The botched handling of North Korea and Iran, which has led to one nation already acquiring a nuclear bomb and the other increasingly slipping out from under international inspections. http://tinyurl.com/yjq76l [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on November 9, 2006]

Note: http://tinyurl.com/yjq76l

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:13 pm
    Ahh, Haroon paints with such broad strokes.

    "The entire gamut of Bush's policies stand repudiated". I think not. This was definitely against Bush's occupation of Iraq (which I agree has been an unmitigated failure and was built on lies to begin with), but had it been on Afghanistan and/or just about anything else, he may have won yet again. The vast majority of American's (including the so-called lefty Democrats) support the actions in Afghanistan. Haroon knows this, but needs these broad strokes to sow discord here against something he is personally against. Once again, this man needs to check his facts. The Republican loss was based on the Iraq adventure entirely. Not Israel, not Afghanistan, not even the domestic economy.

  2. by Trent
    Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:59 pm
    Gee Mike, I dunno what you've been reading, but it's not what I've been reading, and I've been everywhere, man. Mainstream newsfeeds seem to think it was a combination of stuff that included domestic issues including corruption fer instance, sex scandals (plural), the general weirdness of 911 and all the ensuing coverup-scented fallout to name only 3 and a 1/2, plus a myriad of other nasty tidbits all recorded for posterity on a thousand websites, not to mention their bizarre foreign policies. Too much Tom Cerber with your morning coffee, perhaps...

  3. Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:50 am
    The Republican loss was based on the Iraq adventure entirely. Not Israel, not Afghanistan, not even the domestic economy. <<

    The Dems has suggested that the troops pull fron Iraq and stationed in neighbouring countries to "observe" It had also been suggested that the troops go to Afghanistan, where better needed. Political speechs or for real, Harper thinks for real.



    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  4. Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:07 am
    Looks like Harper needs to find a new master. His previous one was just fed to the dogs.

  5. Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:17 am
    It took longer than Spain, Italy and others but the US voters finally said no to empire. Harper and his slow thinking ilk will not catch on - and that is a bonus for the rest of us. These clowns still think trickle-down economics works for crying out loud!

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  6. Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:37 am
    To Roy White.


    With all due respect RW the average voter in the US and Canada is stuck in some hallucination that any one established party has integrity and is independent of ruling class influence.

    &#8220;The main mark of modern governments is that we do not know who governs, de facto any more than de jure. We see the politician and not his backer; still less the backer of his backer; or what is most important of all, the BANKER of the backer.&#8221;
    GK Chesterton.

    When the electorate becomes lulled into believing that fault lies with this party or that they have totally missed that fault doesn&#8217;t lie with the party&#8217;s but with those who elect them.




    ---
    Diogenes said:
    "I am Diogenes the Dog. I nuzzle the kind, bark at the greedy and bite scoundrels."

  7. Fri Nov 10, 2006 7:31 am
    ps.<br />
    <br />
    I had this in mind when I was responding to your post RW<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.rense.com/general74/VOTINGIN.HTM">http://www.rense.com/general74/VOTINGIN.HTM</a><br />
    <br />
    <br />
    &#8220;Too many Americans harbor the illusion that we live in a democracy simply because we have the right to vote. But let us be clear about something: voting matters only where real choices are allowed. It is universally understood that special interest money runs the American political system and thus defines what the choices will be. So we are left to choose between candidates who are financed by special interest money, which any fool can see, is no choice at all.&#8221;<br />
    <p>---<br>Diogenes said:<br />
    "I am Diogenes the Dog. I nuzzle the kind, bark at the greedy and bite scoundrels."

  8. Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:20 am
    Similarly, a rethinking is required in Afghanistan. Harper's characterization of the Taliban as an existential threat to Canada — if we aren't there, they'd be here — is as foolish as Bush justifying his enterprise in Iraq as essential to American security.

    The American voters have seen through the Bush propaganda. Will Harper?

    Anyone paying attention, and one would expect Harper is, can see through Bush "propaganda" and Harper being who he is will be more inclined to emulate Bush by using the same propaganda than admit it is propaganda.

    In the article, Haroon was being very generous and most polite making these statements. I couldn't have held back the way he did.


    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  9. Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:16 pm
    I'll agree with your first two, Trent. The scandals and corruption definitely helped. One would have thought that corruption on that scale would have done more (the Liberals corruption was on a much smaller scale and they were punished much more harshly than the Republicans). However, 9/11 played an insignificant role, especially since the Dems have no stomach to revisit this. And the Dems are saying they want to move troops into Afghanistan and out of Iraq. That's what the American's voted for. Which does not agree at all with Haroon's analysis.

  10. Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:05 am
    Tomorrow we honor the dead and those who crossed the ocean to save european countries from an invader. We now send troops to aid the invader. How dare Harper use the comparison of what he, Bush (NATO) are doing in Afghanistan to those who fought in WWI & II. Politicans stoop at nothing to convince good people to do what's wrong. At least the American people showed Bush as to how far they will go. (Unfortunatly it's for loosing the war and not for the invasion.) Harper will continue telling Canadians that we are victorious in fighting those who are fighting back, to regain their country. As long as people believe we are doing good in Afghanistan, Harper will continue on.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news