MPs Denied Information, Bankers Sale!

Posted on Saturday, June 23 at 12:08 by Rural
Unfortunately, the current prime minister is trying to pull the same number on Parliament itself. And the Buildings Caper is a great example. Thursday night I posted an MPtv interview with fellow MP Diane Marleau, one of the toughest women I have ever met, and gave you a little info on the government’s current plan to sell off buildings we all own. There is a great deal more information to share with you on this deal, and one overriding main point. For the record, Public Works minister Michael Fortier, who answers to no voters since he was appointed by Stephen Harper, wants to dispose of many of the 350 buildings taxpayers own across Canada. To do this, he hired two banks – Montreal and RBC – to do a feasibility study on the potential sale of 40 of them. For this, each bank was paid $100,000. The study concluded (not surprisingly) that buildings should be privatized, and the banks picked nine of the best office towers to market as a pilot project. These buildings are currently used to house federal civil servants, plus rent to some other tenants, and the suggestion was that they be leased back for terms of up to 25 years. By the way, both banks have fairly strong CPC connections, including Rick Byers, at BeeMo, who heads up the division involved. Mr. Byers worked as an assistant to Michael Wilson, when he was finance minister, and most lately ran as a Harper candidate in Oakville. I have no evidence for you that he stands to profit form this personally, or that any improper association has been struck with the current government. More: http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/06/22/crossroads/

Note: http://www.garth.ca/web...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by avatar Milton
    Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:39 pm
    Everybody knows that it is cheaper to rent than to own, that is why the rich rent everything and own nothing. Good post Rural.

  2. Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:31 am
    Sounds borderline criminal to me. Cons give money to banks known for backing them across the years knowing full well what the conclusions would be from their 'study'. Smacks of the sponsorship scandal imo.

    What I want to know is - are those buildings already paid for? If they are - why in $#$@#@# are we selling them to private interests only to rent them back?

    I remember during the last election season having a tit-for-tat debate with two Conservative candidates (one of whom was elected), who both swore up and down that the Conservatives had no plans to privatize anything. Yet, their own campaign material said they would look at it in the future. They print the material, hand it out, then tell a crowd that they have no such intention. Then a little over a year later - do just that.

    Liberals + Conservatives = two parties full of lying sellouts.

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news