Thou Shalt Not Lean Too Far To The Right

Posted on Saturday, September 22 at 13:55 by 4Canada
As a result, political junkies waiting for Parliament to reconvene on Oct. 16 can forget about seeing the opposition parties defeat the government right after the Speech from the Throne and spark an election this fall – Mr. Harper's fifth campaign in six years. Much as he might like an early race, election dates are now fixed by legislation and he can't just ask the Governor-General to dissolve Parliament. The opposition must pass a no-confidence vote, and that just got a lot less likely. And why would he want to go to the polls? Because Stephen Harper is trying to do what no Conservative leader since Sir John A. Macdonald has been able to do – build a viable, long-term political coalition with a broad enough appeal to win elections and, if it falls short, enough strength of character and self-discipline to avoid immolating itself on a bonfire of recrimination. In other words, he wants the Conservatives to replace the Liberals as the natural governing party of Canada. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070921.cover22/BNStory/National/home [Proofreader’s note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 24, 2007]

Note: http://www.theglobeandm...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:08 am
    Tom Flanagan was and is the master strategist for Harper and his capabilities to manouvre is quite transparent in this article on several of his "commandments". -------- <b>2. Moderation</b> - "In times of perceived crisis, a conservative party can win by positioning itself further to the right, as shown by the victories of Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Ralph Klein, Mike Harris and Gordon Campbell. But Canadians don't perceive themselves in crisis right now." And George W. Bush. Perceived crisises can easily be created particularly by those in power to create them. There are several that can be easily triggered by only a little bit of cleverness such as the $USD fallout. -------- <b>4. Incrementalism</b> - "Small conservative reforms are less likely to scare voters than grand conservative schemes" - "change shall proceed by insensible degrees.” Think Security and Prosperity Partnership -------- <b>6. Self-discipline</b> - "The media are unforgiving of conservative errors, so we have to exercise strict discipline at all levels" Harper is unforgiving of the media - "Staff must avoid the limelight" and seen as a cog in the Harper machine - "but they (media) are particularly suspicious of conservatives." -------- <b>7. Toughness</b> - "run hard-hitting, fact-based negative ads, and do whatever is legally possible to jam our opponents' communications and disrupt their operations." This is always the first line of stratigy as most people will see this before thay can read the "policy" let alone work out the facts ther might be behind it. - "Tory advertising went for the jugular and it paid off. Their war-room messages also scored heavily" This allusion to battlefield slaughter should suggest we are dealing with a person who is comfortable with applying this terror to manipulating the voter consciousness.

  2. by Innes
    Sun Sep 23, 2007 5:22 pm
    "In times of perceived crisis, a conservative party can win by positioning itself further to the right, as shown by the victories of Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Ralph Klein, Mike Harris and Gordon Campbell. But Canadians don't perceive themselves in crisis right now."

    It is quite bold of Flanagan to admit that Naomi Klein's thesis is correct: that right wing politicians use disaster to enhance corporate power.

  3. Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:01 pm
    "Because Stephen Harper is trying to do what no Conservative leader since Sir John A. Macdonald has been able to do – build a viable, long-term political coalition with a broad enough appeal to win elections"

    I don't understand. Isn't this what a good party leader should be doing?

    ---
    The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.

  4. Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:51 pm
    The thing is that Harper is trying to get a majority more or less by stealth, Doc.
    He wants to massively change this country, but he can't say it out loud because
    the majority of Canadians disagree with him.

    Flanagan has as much as admitted that in his book.

  5. Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:30 pm
    Exactly the reason that this former liberal will be voting conservative .. as long as there are minority control governments which work to control the right wing nuts as compared to the even worse left wing nuts in the liberal and NDP



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news