Coming To Terms With Perils Of Non-Stick Products

Posted on Tuesday, May 30 at 08:49 by Ed Deak
Some environmental groups are comparing the chemicals to DDT, the pesticide that was the poster child for the environmental movement during the 1960s before it was banned. But while DDT eventually breaks down into less-harmful substances, these new chemicals don't appear to degrade under any known biological process.

“A good way to think about it is as the DDT of this millennium,” said Richard Wiles, vice-president of Environmental Working Group, a Washington-based environmental organization that was one of the first to question the safety of the chemicals. “The fact that they last forever really raises the stakes. Even DDT goes away after decades or centuries.”

DuPont Co. said its Teflon frying pans and other kitchenware are safe if used properly.

Link [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on June 1, 2006]

Note: Link

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Wed May 31, 2006 1:20 am
    <a href="http://www.epinions.com/content_223937138308">http://www.epinions.com/content_223937138308</a><p>---<br>RickW

  2. by avatar Milton
    Wed May 31, 2006 2:46 am
    Good post Ed. And then there are the monsters at environment canada, firing scientists who won't rubberstamp reviews and we are supposed to believe that they are trying to close loopholes that allowed 23,000 untested chemicals to be grandfathered into use by the general public.

    ---

    "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
    (Albert Einstein)

  3. Wed May 31, 2006 9:11 pm
    This story was sent to me by a world class scientist, personal friend of mine, who knows what goes on.

    There are about 200,000 chemicals in use today, but of them only less than 15,000 have been thoroughly tested. Prescription medications kill an average of 9,000 people in Canada every year, and about 100,000 in the USA. Some of our old friends have been crippled and killed by them We don't use any.

    No GM foods, or seeds have ever been thoroughly tested, or any results published, to protect the "intellectual property rights" of the corporations. One scientist, Dr.Arpad Pusztay, who discovered serious damage to the stomachs of laboratory rats from GM potatoes, was fired by the U of Edinborough in Scotland, and globally vilified by the bought and paid for "scientific" community. No more tests, because everybody knows he was correct and that would interfere with the wealth creating plans.

    How much damage do aluminum cans and cookware cause? My wife breaks out all over if she drinks from an aluminum can, or cup, therefore, there must be some residues passed into humans. Who knows, and who cares about the damage as long as people don't drop dead on the spot and it is profitable.

    Ed Deak.

  4. Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:55 am
    C B C . C A N e w s - F u l l S t o r y :
    Test shows pollutants in kids' blood, urine
    Last Updated Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:14:29 EDT
    CBC News

    Toxic chemicals such as stain repellents, flame retardants, lead and PCBs are showing up in the bodies of Canadians as young as 10, a new study suggests.
    Rick Smith is the executive director of Environmental Defence. (CBC)

    * FROM NOV. 9, 2005: Environmentalists test Canadians for pollutants

    The group Environmental Defence tested the blood and urine of six adults and seven children. The families lived in Vancouver, Toronto, Sarnia, Montreal and Quispamsis, N.B.

    There are few studies that show what, if any, damage is caused by chronic low-level exposure to the pollutants, but environmentalists say many of the chemicals are neurotoxins, hormone disrupters or are associated with cancer.

    The levels found by the testing are low, and were not detectable until recently because of advances in technology.

    In some cases, the children had higher levels of contaminants than their parents, the group said in its report, "Polluted Children, Toxic Nation: A Report on Pollution in Canadian Families," released Thursday.

    "Our children are being poisoned every day by toxic chemicals that surround them at home, school and play," said Rick Smith, executive director of Environmental Defence, in a release.

    Adults showed higher levels of older chemicals such as DDT and PCBs that are no longer in use.

    But children tended to test higher for newer chemicals such as brominated flame retardants (PBDEs) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), used in stain repellents and non-stick coatings.

    The finding of fewer banned chemicals in children suggest bans can work, though the effects of the chemical can linger for years, the report said.

    Environmental Defence said children are more vulnerable because their bodies are still developing, and because their behaviour, such as putting objects in their mouth and playing in the dirt, increases their exposure.

    Vivian Maraghi, a study volunteer from Montreal, said she was astounded to find she had 36 industrial chemicals in her body.

    "But when I saw the toxic chemicals in my son's body, I was angry. Our children deserve better protection."

    Something can be done

    The group is calling on the federal government to:

    * Establish timelines to eliminate toxic chemicals, starting with PBDEs and PFOA.
    * Make industry accountable for its chemicals.
    * Regulate chemicals in consumer products.
    * Reduce pollution in the Great Lakes Basin.

    Health Canada looks at all new chemicals and reviews older chemicals used in the country, said Paul Glover, head of the department's environment program. Glover said the results shouldn't cause parents to panic.

    "Yes, there is something in their blood, but it's in exceedingly small levels," said Glover. "For the PBDEs we would have to see at least a 300-fold increase before there would be any evidence of even the most minimal harmful effects to humans."

    Meanwhile, the federal government has said it will hold a review of the Environmental Protection Act.

    Copyright ©2006 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation - All Rights Reserved

  5. by wasjod
    Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:27 pm
    Yet more proof that local control and local solutions are always the best way. Grow your own, kill your own, eat your own is my saying. When my parents tried to buy non-stick my grandma kicked them in the ass, stick to cast iron and stainless steel she said and so what if you have to put butter or some oil in the pan. As natural as possible works best. I have not eaten shit from a can for over a decade, I eat my own meat that I hunt and can't stand the taste of store bought meat anymore. I grow my own veg and fruit as much as I can. I lot of this, I think most of it to be honest is down to diet and the shit water we drink. The city of Calgary puts flouride into the water, I can't even opt out unless I buy bottled water. My grandparents did not have this shit happening to them as they lived entirely off the land.

    ---
    My freedom is more important than your great idea.
    – Anonymous



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news