There is one lonely voice on the other side. In 2006, Judge Dean D. Pregerson of
Federal District Court in Los Angeles suppressed the evidence against Mr.
Arnold.
“Electronic storage devices function as an extension of our own memory,” Judge
Pregerson wrote, in explaining why the government should not be allowed to
inspect them without cause. “They are capable of storing our thoughts, ranging
from the most whimsical to the most profound.”
Note:
Read More Here

I agree there's no difference, but neither should be allowed unless the police have a valid and justified search warrant.
-Max Planck<br />
<br />
HAIL HARPER! HAIL HAIL ...
But then again...if you store any pr0n of any kind?
...can you be sure, everything you look at is |insert local_ID Country Code legal age_|
Will sex offender lists be the new 'addict' after they legalize marijuana?
The Corporatist State always needs leverage and lots of 'magical thinking'.
Or Can you still be law-abiding citizen, who pays taxes, smokes a joint, strokes free pr0n, and laughs at the police state in the same way folks did back in 2004?
Didn't think so...it's much more serious now
We can no longer travel by "legal" means, since we're all potential criminals now, to be searched at random for no legitimate reason at all. I say bring on the fictional terrorists, they are a great deal more agreeable than the police state we find ourselves locked up in.