RCMP's "Inexplicable" Intervention Into Canada's Election Campaign

Posted on Monday, January 09 at 14:00 by Anonymous
As would be expected, the Conservatives have made the RCMP announcement new fodder for this campaign. Conservative leader Stephen Harper proclaimed the as of yet unproven allegations of insider-trading part of “an ongoing pattern of scandal and corruption” and reference to the scandal was soon incorporated into the Conservatives’ television ad campaign. In a January 2 speech, Harper proclaimed that the first priority of a Conservative government would be passage of a Federal Accountability Act that will purportedly ensure ethical, corruption-free government. The Conservatives, however, have let the social-democratic NDP take the lead in trumpeting the charges of possible illegalities surrounding Goodale’s November 23 announcement. This is because corporate Canada is none too anxious for light to be shed on the events surrounding the Liberals’ decision to maintain the tax-free status of income-trusts and lower the taxation rate on stock-dividend income—and not just because if anyone profited from insider information about Goodale’s announcement it was almost certainly large institutional investors, such as the brokerage firms of the country’s six major banks. Any serious look at the Liberal government’s decision would expose how corporate Canada dictates policy to the government and how the various political parties vie with each other in trying to please big business. According to economic affairs columnist Eric Reguly, Bay Street “was drunk on income trust brew, ensuring that any effort to tame the trusts”—that is to tax them like other corporations—“would be met by a formidable political backlash.” Under any circumstances, a mid-election campaign announcement from the RCMP of a criminal investigation with potential political ramifications would have been unprecedented. All the more so under conditions where the principal opposition party has proclaimed government corruption to be the overriding issue. Just how unprecedented is made clear in a column by Jeffrey Simpson in Friday’s Globe and Mail. The national affairs columnist for the country’s most politically influential newspaper for more than two decades, Simpson has innumerable contacts and connections with senior politicians and government officials and members of the police and judiciary. “You don’t,” writes Simpson, “have to be a shill for the Liberals to ask what the heck the Mounties [RCMP] thought they were doing in announcing a criminal investigation during an election campaign. “... What the RCMP did was inexplicable and quite wrong. Informed friends who know about RCMP practices are baffled. They’ve never seen anything like it before.” Simpson adds that “normal RCMP practice, according to those familiar with such matters, would have been to acknowledge receipt of” a November 28 letter from NDP MP Judy Wasylycia-Leis asking for a police inquiry into the events surrounding the large spike in the volume of trading and value of Toronto Stock Exchange shares in the hours preceding Goodale’s Nov. 23 announcement. Then the RCMP should have determined whether there was sufficient reason to warrant an investigation and if it did, launch one, but “without informing the world.” Instead, writes Simpson “the Mounties put themselves smack in the middle of an election campaign, which is where they should not be.” http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/jan2006/cana-j09.shtml [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 9, 2006]

Note: http://www.wsws.org/art...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Jan 09, 2006 10:32 pm
    Old news! But seems like someone (that has returned from vacation) is trying to get an old story some new life... not a chance Tory!

    Conservatives a clean party??? Give us a break! What about Conrad Black and the huge money he gave to the Cons???

  2. Mon Jan 09, 2006 10:32 pm
    "the Royal Canadian Mounted Police’s announcement that it is conducting a
    criminal investigation into the possible leaking of a Liberal government
    decision on the taxation of investment income has had a major impact on the
    campaign for the January 23rd federal election."

    SO WHAT?

    DALTON MCCUNTY ALSO WANTED THE RCMP TO INVESTIGATE MIKE HARRIS
    DURING HARRIS'S BUS-DRINKING FIASCO.

    MCCUNTY REALLY WANTED THE RCMP INVOLVED, EVEN THOUGH AT BEST
    LOCAL COPS COULD OF DONE THE SAME JOB.

    IN THIS CASE, IT REALLY IS A SERIOUS BREACH OF CODE. RIGHT NOW IN
    AMERICA, POLITICIANS ARE BEING INDICTED FOR LESSER CHARGES THAN
    THIS.



    ---
    Want the lowdown on all these 'Progressive' websites? Check out my blog at:
    http://canadianliberals.blogspot.com/ - A blog that always "Follows the money"

  3. by avatar Jesse
    Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:24 pm
    Rabblewatch, please stop shouting. ALL-CAPS is hard to read, and is considered rude.

    Mostly, the question is why the RCMP is deciding to bring this up now. It seems to be rather a convenient coincidence, neh?

    ---
    Your mantra has been your opinions are stifled due to their contrary nature, when they are actually stifled for being without perceivable foundation.

  4. Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:49 pm
    This is conspiracy theory at its silliest. The obvious come back is that convenient coincidence could be that Goodale did all of this close to the election cause he thought the RCMP wouldn't do nothing about it.

  5. Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:04 am
    Typical of the Liberals. Blaming someone else for their screw ups. Regardless of whether the RCMP are playing politics, you have to admit the spike in investment activity was real. And Ralph saying he had investigated himself and found himself blameless was just further Liberal arrogance. They also mislead everyone as to how many people knew in finance, PCO and the PMO. Martin and Goodale couldn't even get their talking points straight as to when the PM was informed.

    I think Ralph has some integrity but this certainly raises questions. And seeing him on TV today dutifully playing the Liberal scare (claiming we will go into deficit if the Conservatives are elected) erases any sympathy whatsoever. Twelve years of this sh#1t is long enough.

  6. Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:47 am
    Ralph has some integrity, but which part of some does he have, that should be the question?

  7. Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:48 am
    After this latest Options Canada scandal announcement and the book release, I feel as if I am standing in the middle of a city dump and the smell is starting to get to me.

    I have lost all faith in this monster/mobster
    called"government". Surely Canadians are starting to understand the purpose of a political parties and the damage they have done to Canada.

    We are being raped and pillaged and well on our way to living in a police state.



    ---
    Good government is not a party government

  8. Tue Jan 10, 2006 4:43 am
    I got a speeding ticket from the RCMP last summer... I think there was a shameful political agenda behind it because I should be allowed to go as fast as I frigging want and his laws don't apply to me.

  9. Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:20 am
    "Mostly, the question is why the RCMP is deciding to bring this up now. It
    seems to be rather a convenient coincidence, neh?"

    Liberal Dalton McCunty also tried getting the RCMP to do an investigation on
    Mike Harris.

    In this case, it was the NDP which called the RCMP on the Grits.

    So blame them.

    Oh wait a sec. You're an NDP supporter.



    ---
    Want the lowdown on all these 'Progressive' websites? Check out my blog at:
    http://canadianliberals.blogspot.com/ - A blog that always "Follows the money"

  10. Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:16 pm
    Me too. That guy in Grenfell should be ashamed of himself. I was only going 100 in a 110 zone, after all.

    Thing is that after he noticed the open 2-4 in the back of the truck he didn't announce to the world that he was going to search the cab. He just quietly peeked behind the seat, kind of sniffed my breath, had a look inside my cigarette pack (I don't think he was looking for beer there...), and let me go on my way with a stern lecture about driving while looking unsavoury.

    I would have been pretty angry if he would have gone to the press with his "investigation" before it was done.

    As much as I enjoy stringing up Martin and his Liberals, I can't help but get the feeling that the RCMP are announcing to the press that they need to check that cigarette package because of the open case of beer in the back of the truck.

  11. Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:03 pm
    The Police state supporter's "Conservatives ", it would seem work with the RCMP on this one.

    Ralph Goodale and the RCMP should both be investigated, for conspiracy to "theft" in violation of the 1946 Atomic Energy Control Act.

    The Liberals set the stage for this by trying to appease the Police State proponents in the buerocracy.

    Dennis Baker

  12. Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:08 pm
    I still question the role of the NDP finance critic in all of this. Why did she not just launch a complaint with the RCMP but also apparently the US Securities Exchange? As far as I know, she was the one who informed the public of the investigation not the RCMP.

    Policy in the RCMP has changed over the past few years (under either the last commissioner or the one before that). As I understand it there is a requirement to advise the complainant within a certain time limit as to the stage of the investigation. They could possibly have avoided the issue by saying they were too busy to deal with the case at the moment and delay it until after the election but I wonder what out cry that would have created? This is one of those cases called a no-win situation.

  13. by RPW
    Tue Jan 10, 2006 4:20 pm
    The "Debate" on Monday evening was all smoke-and-mirrors on PMPM's part. Everything he said was meant to distract from his pathetic record.

    He is relying on his "record" as finance minister to gloss over the inherent corruption in the Liberal party. But his "record" consists mostly on just not spendinig. How hard can that be? Well, it's hard of ordinary Canadians. PM is immune to such stuff, having as he does (did) his flags flyinig out of Canada.

    And the Conservatives can offer up no assurances they won't be dipping their fingers either. They are runniing on the "trust me" platform as well. Harper has offered no time frame for his "reforms", and has phrased everything in such a way that it all can have at least two alternative tranlations. And the one thing no one has asked him about his tax cuts, et al, is (like Campbell's Liberals in BC), will service fees be going up when taxes go down, for a net loss in the pocket of the taxpayer?

    As the direct subject matter, the RCMP wants and needs more funding. The record of the Liberals is to promise more but not to deliver. I do not begrudge the cops more funding. Afterall, they are up against tons of illegal drug money. So, until such times as the drug issue is addressed (ie. why do so many Canadians & Amewricans feel it necessary to consume these drugs in the first place?) the cops need cash.

    ---
    RickW

  14. by mk
    Tue Jan 10, 2006 4:42 pm
    In Monday's debate Harper stated categorically that his campaign has not received donations from Conrad Black.

    If this statement is factually true but substantially false (Barabara?), it's time to parse the details.

    Also, when Harper was challenged on his party's donation list, both Duceppe and Layton, when challenged by the moderator, could not state definitively that the CPC had not disclosed their donation list (merely that they remained unaware of any disclosure). Harper insisted the CPC had made this information public for some time. What are the facts on this? Is there an online link to this information?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news