As would be expected, the Conservatives have made the RCMP announcement new fodder for this campaign. Conservative leader Stephen Harper proclaimed the as of yet unproven allegations of insider-trading part of “an ongoing pattern of scandal and corruption” and reference to the scandal was soon incorporated into the Conservatives’ television ad campaign. In a January 2 speech, Harper proclaimed that the first priority of a Conservative government would be passage of a Federal Accountability Act that will purportedly ensure ethical, corruption-free government.
The Conservatives, however, have let the social-democratic NDP take the lead in trumpeting the charges of possible illegalities surrounding Goodale’s November 23 announcement. This is because corporate Canada is none too anxious for light to be shed on the events surrounding the Liberals’ decision to maintain the tax-free status of income-trusts and lower the taxation rate on stock-dividend income—and not just because if anyone profited from insider information about Goodale’s announcement it was almost certainly large institutional investors, such as the brokerage firms of the country’s six major banks.
Any serious look at the Liberal government’s decision would expose how corporate Canada dictates policy to the government and how the various political parties vie with each other in trying to please big business. According to economic affairs columnist Eric Reguly, Bay Street “was drunk on income trust brew, ensuring that any effort to tame the trusts”—that is to tax them like other corporations—“would be met by a formidable political backlash.”
Under any circumstances, a mid-election campaign announcement from the RCMP of a criminal investigation with potential political ramifications would have been unprecedented. All the more so under conditions where the principal opposition party has proclaimed government corruption to be the overriding issue.
Just how unprecedented is made clear in a column by Jeffrey Simpson in Friday’s Globe and Mail. The national affairs columnist for the country’s most politically influential newspaper for more than two decades, Simpson has innumerable contacts and connections with senior politicians and government officials and members of the police and judiciary.
“You don’t,” writes Simpson, “have to be a shill for the Liberals to ask what the heck the Mounties [RCMP] thought they were doing in announcing a criminal investigation during an election campaign.
“... What the RCMP did was inexplicable and quite wrong. Informed friends who know about RCMP practices are baffled. They’ve never seen anything like it before.”
Simpson adds that “normal RCMP practice, according to those familiar with such matters, would have been to acknowledge receipt of” a November 28 letter from NDP MP Judy Wasylycia-Leis asking for a police inquiry into the events surrounding the large spike in the volume of trading and value of Toronto Stock Exchange shares in the hours preceding Goodale’s Nov. 23 announcement. Then the RCMP should have determined whether there was sufficient reason to warrant an investigation and if it did, launch one, but “without informing the world.” Instead, writes Simpson “the Mounties put themselves smack in the middle of an election campaign, which is where they should not be.”
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/jan2006/cana-j09.shtml
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 9, 2006]
Note: http://www.wsws.org/art...

Conservatives a clean party??? Give us a break! What about Conrad Black and the huge money he gave to the Cons???
criminal investigation into the possible leaking of a Liberal government
decision on the taxation of investment income has had a major impact on the
campaign for the January 23rd federal election."
SO WHAT?
DALTON MCCUNTY ALSO WANTED THE RCMP TO INVESTIGATE MIKE HARRIS
DURING HARRIS'S BUS-DRINKING FIASCO.
MCCUNTY REALLY WANTED THE RCMP INVOLVED, EVEN THOUGH AT BEST
LOCAL COPS COULD OF DONE THE SAME JOB.
IN THIS CASE, IT REALLY IS A SERIOUS BREACH OF CODE. RIGHT NOW IN
AMERICA, POLITICIANS ARE BEING INDICTED FOR LESSER CHARGES THAN
THIS.
---
Want the lowdown on all these 'Progressive' websites? Check out my blog at:
http://canadianliberals.blogspot.com/ - A blog that always "Follows the money"
Mostly, the question is why the RCMP is deciding to bring this up now. It seems to be rather a convenient coincidence, neh?
---
Your mantra has been your opinions are stifled due to their contrary nature, when they are actually stifled for being without perceivable foundation.
I think Ralph has some integrity but this certainly raises questions. And seeing him on TV today dutifully playing the Liberal scare (claiming we will go into deficit if the Conservatives are elected) erases any sympathy whatsoever. Twelve years of this sh#1t is long enough.
I have lost all faith in this monster/mobster
called"government". Surely Canadians are starting to understand the purpose of a political parties and the damage they have done to Canada.
We are being raped and pillaged and well on our way to living in a police state.
---
Good government is not a party government
seems to be rather a convenient coincidence, neh?"
Liberal Dalton McCunty also tried getting the RCMP to do an investigation on
Mike Harris.
In this case, it was the NDP which called the RCMP on the Grits.
So blame them.
Oh wait a sec. You're an NDP supporter.
---
Want the lowdown on all these 'Progressive' websites? Check out my blog at:
http://canadianliberals.blogspot.com/ - A blog that always "Follows the money"
Thing is that after he noticed the open 2-4 in the back of the truck he didn't announce to the world that he was going to search the cab. He just quietly peeked behind the seat, kind of sniffed my breath, had a look inside my cigarette pack (I don't think he was looking for beer there...), and let me go on my way with a stern lecture about driving while looking unsavoury.
I would have been pretty angry if he would have gone to the press with his "investigation" before it was done.
As much as I enjoy stringing up Martin and his Liberals, I can't help but get the feeling that the RCMP are announcing to the press that they need to check that cigarette package because of the open case of beer in the back of the truck.
Ralph Goodale and the RCMP should both be investigated, for conspiracy to "theft" in violation of the 1946 Atomic Energy Control Act.
The Liberals set the stage for this by trying to appease the Police State proponents in the buerocracy.
Dennis Baker
Policy in the RCMP has changed over the past few years (under either the last commissioner or the one before that). As I understand it there is a requirement to advise the complainant within a certain time limit as to the stage of the investigation. They could possibly have avoided the issue by saying they were too busy to deal with the case at the moment and delay it until after the election but I wonder what out cry that would have created? This is one of those cases called a no-win situation.
He is relying on his "record" as finance minister to gloss over the inherent corruption in the Liberal party. But his "record" consists mostly on just not spendinig. How hard can that be? Well, it's hard of ordinary Canadians. PM is immune to such stuff, having as he does (did) his flags flyinig out of Canada.
And the Conservatives can offer up no assurances they won't be dipping their fingers either. They are runniing on the "trust me" platform as well. Harper has offered no time frame for his "reforms", and has phrased everything in such a way that it all can have at least two alternative tranlations. And the one thing no one has asked him about his tax cuts, et al, is (like Campbell's Liberals in BC), will service fees be going up when taxes go down, for a net loss in the pocket of the taxpayer?
As the direct subject matter, the RCMP wants and needs more funding. The record of the Liberals is to promise more but not to deliver. I do not begrudge the cops more funding. Afterall, they are up against tons of illegal drug money. So, until such times as the drug issue is addressed (ie. why do so many Canadians & Amewricans feel it necessary to consume these drugs in the first place?) the cops need cash.
---
RickW
If this statement is factually true but substantially false (Barabara?), it's time to parse the details.
Also, when Harper was challenged on his party's donation list, both Duceppe and Layton, when challenged by the moderator, could not state definitively that the CPC had not disclosed their donation list (merely that they remained unaware of any disclosure). Harper insisted the CPC had made this information public for some time. What are the facts on this? Is there an online link to this information?