"Contrary to conventional wisdom, it seems that Iraqis do indeed experience at least minor feelings of grief when a best friend or a grandparent is ripped apart by a car bomb or shot execution style and later unearthed in a shallow mass grave," Prytzal said. "Last December's suicide-bomb killing of 71 Shiites in Baghdad, for example, produced unexpected reactions ranging from crumpled, sobbing despair to silent, dazed shock."
Iraqis have often been observed weeping and wailing in apparent anguish, but the study offers evidence indicating this may not be exclusively an outward expression of anger or a desire for revenge. It also provocatively suggests that this grief can possess an American-like personal quality, and is not simply a tribal lamentation ritual.
Said Pryztal: "When trying to understand the psychology of the Iraqi citizenry after four years of war, think of a small American town roiled by the death of a well-known high school football player."
According to Pryztal, the intensity of the grief does not diminish if the mourner experiences multiple bereavements over time. "If a woman has already lost one child, the subsequent killings of other children will evoke similar responses," he said. "In the majority of cases we studied, it appeared as though those who lost multiple kids never actually got used to it."
Though Pryztal expects the results of the study may be of some interest to students of Arab psychology, he did concede that the data may not be entirely accurate because it was gathered directly from Iraqis themselves.
"Almost all the Iraqis we interviewed said the war had ruined their lives because of the incalculable loss of friends and family," Pryztal said. "But to be totally honest, these types of studies can be skewed rather easily by participant exaggeration."
Psychologists and anthropologists have thus far largely discounted the study, claiming it has the same bias as a 1971 Stanford University study that concluded that many Vietnamese showed signs of psychological trauma from nearly a quarter century of continuous war in southeast Asia.
"We are, in truth, still a long way from determining if Iraqis are exhibiting actual, U.S.-grade sadness," Mayo Clinic neuropsychologist Norman Blum said. "At present, we see no reason for the popular press to report on Iraqi emotions as if they are real."
Pryztal said that his research group would next examine whether children in Sudan prefer playing with toys or serving as guerrilla fighters and killing innocent civilians.
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/study_iraqis_may_experience?utm_source=onion_rss_daily
Note: http://www.theonion.com...

Wikipedia defines "humour" as follows:
"Humour or humor [that's the American spelling] is the ability or quality of people, objects, or situations to evoke feelings of amusement in other people. The term encompasses a form of entertainment or human communication which evokes such feelings, or which makes people laugh or feel happy. The origin of the term derives from the humoral medicine of the ancient Greeks, which stated that a mix of fluids known as humours (Greek: chymos, literally: juice or sap, metaphorically: flavour) controlled human health and emotion.
A sense of humour is the ability to experience humour, a quality which all people share, although the extent to which an individual will personally find something humorous depends on a host of absolute and relative variables, including geographical location, culture, maturity, level of education, and context. For example, young children (of any background) particularly favour slapstick, such as Punch and Judy puppet shows. Satire may rely more on understanding the target of the humour, and thus tends to appeal to more mature audiences. Non-satirical humor can be specifically termed "recreational drollery".
I can see that grieving Iraqis will make Americans laugh, and the rest of the world cry. The US should have thought about collateral damage before the attack on Iraq.
They did think long and hard about it, and the result was (and still is) a mass propaganda effort designed to dehumanize 'the enemy'.
Remember "Shock and Awe"? The bombing of Baghdad was broadcast live on prime time TV alongside regular entertainment. Did the TV networks (who were complicit in the murderous event) show the mutilated remains of those who were blasted to bits during the bombing raids? No, because it was designed to be perceived as nothing but an exciting sporting event.
The only humanizing scene I can recall, was when they briefly showed (at a distance) Iraqi clean up crews trying to contain the damage, and I'm sure someone got fired for making that mistake.
That's why I re-sectioned if from 'Eye on Uncle Sam'
to 'Humour'. I couldn't imagine the comments if it weren't implicit by the section that it's satire.
Good article, siljan.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
Wikipedia defines 'satire' this way: "Although satire is usually witty and often funny, the purpose of satire is not primarily humor but criticism of an event, an individual or a group, in a clever manner."
Since there is no section for 'satire' I put it under 'Eyes on Uncle Sam'. I was dissapointed to see it under the 'humor' categotry. There is nothing humorus about the daily war crimes and crimes against humanity happening in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine or where ever else the Anglo-American-Zionist axis of evil are destroying peoples lives.
Contrary to American (and a large part of Western) beliefs, the Muslims would leave us alone, if we just stopped bombing their Countries, killing their children and stealing their resources.
Neither Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran or Palestine have ever been a threat to the USA, Britain or Canada no matter what Bush, Blair (and now Brown), Harper or their paid talking heads in the corporate media would have us belive. The biggest threat to world peace is the American Military Industrial Complex, working hand in hand with corporate, economic and Zionist interests.
It would have been an interesting experiment to have left it in Eye on Uncle Sam.
<br />
<a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php?story=20040220124610601">http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php?story=20040220124610601</a><p>---<br>The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.<br />
I re-sectioned it to 'humour' because many people may not be familiar with 'The Onion' and take this as a serious article, rather than satire. We've had articles like this before, when there was no 'humour' section. They didn't go over so well. Many people felt they had been deceived, and were quite angry about it.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
Maybe that crazy 'jaw-slapper' thing did it to me at that moment.