Vive Le Canada

US Supreme Court Supports Child Porn?

Posted on Tuesday, June 29 at 11:06 by Anonymous
Of course, Harper's crowing has nothing to do with liberals weakness on child porn, but with the liberal's intention to prevent the state from encroaching on legitimate uses of expression that contain nude depictions of children. Like literature and art. Is Harper going to criminalise coppertone suntan lotion advertisements? Give me a break. Someone show this to Stephen Harper please. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=2&u=/ap/20040629/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_online_porn

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by KevinGagnon
    Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:53 pm
    Oh yah and Harper wants more integration with the U.S. Does he ever make any sense?

    Kevin

    ---
    "Love actually, is all around us" --From the movie Love Actually.

  2. by RPW
    Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:43 pm
    And yet there is this: http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=2773167 Chain Reaction "In America, meanwhile, Virginia recently banned naturist youth camps, and in Chicago the display of any of 11 body parts carries a $500 fine. In New York the nudists didn't even consider riding for fear of the cops, says Mr Schmidt. Zero tolerance indeed." Is this the neurotic country we want to get into bed with? <p>---<br>RickW

  3. by Anonymous
    Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:57 am
    So, whats the canadian law on child porn? is it legal?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

sitemap | feeds | privacy | copyright | contact
canadian bloggers | canadian news