Improving bilateral relations is likely to be a topic for discussion, but no side trips are planned and there are no expectations of a glitzy, glamourous visit. Instead, an analyst says, the visit is likely to be down to earth, with the emphasis on political interests shared by the two leaders.
Paul Frazer, a former Canadian diplomat who works in Washington as a consultant, told the Canadian Press the meeting will be useful because it will help set "the tone for the personal relationship. Each time they meet, they'll be more comfortable with each other."
Border identification
Harper is expected to press Bush for details on the U.S. plan to require border identification for Canadians — in addition to passports — at land crossings. A deadline for the documentation requirement has been set for Jan. 1, 2008.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2006/07/05/bush-harper-meeting.html
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 6, 2006]
Note: http://www.cbc.ca/story...
Harper's Visit With Bush Expected To Be A Low-Profile Affair
Posted on Wednesday, July 05 at 11:07 by 4CanadaContributed By
Topic
Article Rating
(0 votes)
Options
Stumble It!Comments
view comments in forum
Page 1
"Congratulations, Stephen, with ending your first session of parliament as Prime Minister without defeat."
and so on and so forth till the lunch is over..........
---
If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.
---
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche
Emerson, softwood sellout, elections act violations, bad-mouthing Canada over Iraq and entrenching Afghanistan is just the start of his legacy.
---
If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.
Perhaps, but most of the Marxist leaders he so admired haven't, save Castro I guess. I think though as politics in the country ceases to be dominated by the baby boom generation, a more balanced view of both Trudeau and Mulroney and their respective legacies will emerge.
"Harper will be remembered by most Canadians as he is by most now - the leader of the far-right representing the worst aspects of Canadian culture."
So what are these "worst aspects" you speak of? Are you talking about self-reliance, the work ethic, accountability for one's actions, personal liberty or individual rights? How about safety on the streets, fiscal responsibility and a mature attitude to our southern neighbour? Why do I get the feeling that you define the "worst aspects of Canadian culture" as whatever Alberta is, and Toronto isn't?