Failing In Iraq

Posted on Friday, August 19 at 15:09 by Ed Deak
The news from Iraq is invariably tragic. Civilian casualties are up dramatically since the elections and there's no sign of them relenting anytime in the near future. Similarly, the militia violence has increased steadily as has the detention of Iraqi suspects, now estimated to be around 40,000 prisoners. Casualties among American servicemen have reached a new high at 1843 with the Marines taking the brunt of the losses. These figures are bound to swell given that the number of roadside bomb attacks has doubled to about 30 per week. Now, it is not unusual to see 5 or 6 American servicemen killed in a day; something that was extremely rare in the early months of the conflict. The Army Surgeon General released a report two weeks ago confirming that 30% of the soldiers returning from Iraq are suffering from mental disorders. Also, the number of suicides among veterans is up markedly; a distressing omen of things to come. The US will harvest another generation of troubled veterans whose lives were ruined in a war of choice. The number of suicide bombers has peaked in post-election Iraq, with hundreds, if not thousands of young Jihadis swarming to Iraq to fight the American occupation. It has become the cause celebre among Arab nationalists and is fueling a resurgence in Muslim unity. This revival, though still in its infant stage, is bound to flourish as long as the United States occupies Iraq with combat troops and military bases. Recent polls show that public support for the war is seriously weakening. In March 2004, 65 percent of Americans supported the decision to wage war in Iraq. In the latest Gallup poll, support has sagged to 44 percent. This downward spiral is reflected in every important area related to the war including George Bush's personal popularity and trustworthiness. The numbers show that Americans are now feeling "Iraq fatigue" as well as a growing wariness with the Commander-in-chief. The polls also verify that the public sees a connection between Iraq and the bombings in London. Since the subway attacks, many terror-experts have confirmed that the war in Iraq has become a rallying cry for Islamic fighters and has increased the probability of an attack at home. 57% of Americans now believe that they are "less safe" than they were before the war. The rhetoric from the White House has done little to relieve the fears of the average American. It's clear that the "clash of civilizations" that both Bin Laden and George Bush so devoutly sought appears to be materializing. America's unholy war has created a breeding-ground for the next generation of terrorists and moved us all closer to a decades-long conflict and a reshaping of the geopolitical landscape. The incidents of violence against Muslims in England are up 600% since 2004, and the Blair government continues to feed the public fear of radical Islam. The Prime Minister is executing a strategy of victimizing Muslims to undermine long-held commitments to human rights. Blair's assault on Islamic extremism is a carefully choreographed public relations scheme to eviscerate basic civil liberties provided under English law. The Bush administration's effort to cast Iraq as a part of the broader war on terror has proved to be hopelessly flawed. In last week's press conference, Bush reiterated the themes that are now used exclusively to justify the occupation. In less than 30 minutes, Bush used the term "terrorist" 15 times, "hateful ideology" 3 times and "enemies of freedom" twice. "A free Iraq in the heart of the Middle East will deliver a serious blow to their hateful ideology" (We are fighting) "the enemies of freedom" "We're also fighting the murderous ideology, the hateful ideology of the terrorists, and we're doing so by spreading freedom," Bush opined. The precipitous decline in support for the war indicates that the Bush strategy of fear mongering is no longer working. Once the deceptions that underscore the war on terror begin to vanish, there's little chance that the administration will be able to elicit the support needed to continue the conflict. Bush's demagoguery has been further challenged by the recent video of bin Laden's chief- lieutenant, Eyman al-Zawahiri. Al-Zawahiri's statement was a straightforward explanation of Al Qaida's objectives:"Our message to you is clear, strong and final: there will be no salvation until you withdraw from our land, stop stealing our oil, and end your support for our corrupt leaders". Regardless of al Zawahiri's alleged connection to 9-11, his demands are reasonable and consistent with those of the vast majority of American's who neither support occupation nor imperial adventurism. Al Zawahiri's statement was just another body-blow to Washington's propaganda campaign and to the illusion that Muslims are freedom-hating fanatics. Despite the administration's efforts, the conflict in Iraq will continue to unravel. The ever-shifting rationale for the war has been picked-apart by critics and summarily discredited. Similarly, public support is in irreversible decline and will inevitably cause greater disruptions at home. The occupation may persist for 10 years or so, but there is no longer any realistic expectation for an American victory. The goal of establishing an American colony in the Middle East has fallen on hard-times exposing the nation to the possibility of ruin in the process. For Washington powerbrokers and policy-makers even the thought of failure in Iraq is too grim to contemplate. The withdrawal of combat troops would put the second largest supply of oil in the world in the hands of an Islamic government which would quickly grow into a major player in the region and compete openly with rival Israel. Withdrawal would also hasten the expected switch in currencies from dollars to petro-euros; a change that would signal the end of America's economic dominance through control of the world's reserve currency. The US would be forced to face the $8 trillion debt that currently underwrites the "greenback" and deal with the economy-busting hyper-inflation that would quickly ensue. If creditor nations suddenly decided to dump their US currency and bonds and move to oil-backed assets, the US economy would go into freefall. It is impossible to calculate the magnitude of the catastrophe for the American people. This suggests that the Bush administration will carry on for as long as possible; trying to cobble together a strategy that will allow them to stay in Iraq controlling both the oil and the political process. But as the Iraqi resistance grows in strength and daring, and as public support continues to erode, there's little chance that the administration will be able to avoid the looming disaster. The American Century is now looking like it may be abbreviated to 10 or 15 years at the most. The New World Order, built on the rubble of Falluja and on the tortured victims of Abu Ghraib, is being progressively dismantled by the grit and resolve of the Iraqi resistance fighting to restore their nation's sovereignty and independence. It appears increasingly likely that their struggle will succeed. Mike Whitney can be reached at: fergiewhitney@msn.com Reprinted from CounterPunch: -- http://counterpunch.org/whitney08152005.html

Note: http://counterpunch.org...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:45 am
    Bush says:"A free Iraq in the heart of the Middle East will deliver a serious blow to their hateful ideology" (We are fighting) "the enemies of freedom" "We're also fighting the murderous ideology, the hateful ideology of the terrorists, and we're doing so by spreading freedom,"...

    al Zawahiri says:"Our message to you is clear, strong and final: there will be no salvation until you withdraw from our land, stop stealing our oil, and end your support for our corrupt leaders".

    This al Zawahiri, he's considered a terrorist? He has hateful ideology? He has murderous ideology? For me this announcement sounds completely rational. IDlogical.

    This Bush guy, he's the leader with his finger on the buttons of the most destructive bombs in the world? He's the one with the knife that will spread freedom with a sneer? I wonder out of all the speeches he has given just exactly how many times has he expressed a new thought? Said anything concrete and rational? He, I believe has murderous ideology down to a creepy science.

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  2. Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:12 pm
    In regards to Bush never saying anything new - if you say a lie enough times some people will come to believe it. Sadly for Bush though, not all Americans are that stupid, nor are they going to continue to believe the lies. Even the dumbest person can only be lied to so many times.

    As for al Zawahiri, and the others - they knowingly kill innocents and that is wrong no matter the end goal. Though with that, under international law and precedence (WW2 freedom fighters and patriots), an occupied people have the right to defend their nation by force of arms. Did French and Dutch resistance kill their own - you bet they did. Not on the scale that is happening in Iraq but it happened. Americans ignore history more than any other IMHO. When French resistance killed some Germans, the Nazis would kill innocents in return as punishment. That did not stop the resistance.

    Clearly, this is not about Muslims wanting to invade America, or take away their freedoms as the Bush camp has conned so many into believing, it is clearly as their enemy says - about getting them out of their nations. We would do and want the same if Muslim armies were in Canada and the US. We should expect no less from them.

  3. Sun Nov 27, 2005 1:32 am
    Forget about the U.S. failing in Iraq.
    Canada is failing in its own backyard....It's provinces.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news