Ranchers' Revolt Hits BC Legislature

Posted on Saturday, March 31 at 12:10 by Ed Deak
That principle has been written into law in this province since the gold rush of the mid-19th century. But in 2002, the Liberal government amended the Mineral Tenure Act, removing a section that prohibited miners from "obstruction or interference" with activities or buildings on private land. The government also made it easier to stake a claim on someone else's land. For $25, you can get a miner's licence. Then you can go online and buy the mineral rights, at 17 cents an acre, for whatever unclaimed property you like. Miners have even claimed the mineral rights to a vacation home on the Sunshine Coast belonging to Premier Gordon Campbell. Grassroots meeting Last weekend, landowners from across the province met in Vernon to tell their stories. The meeting was organized by the B.C. Landowners Rights Group (BCLOR), which has been fighting to give property owners more say in what can be done on their land. Nelson-Creston MLA Corky Evans was there, and on Tuesday he described the meeting in the legislature. "We started with a woman who owns the Australian Ranch north of Quesnel, which has been in her family since 1903," said Evans, the opposition critic for agriculture and lands. "She advised that a former minister from the NDP came with a mining company and said to her, 'We're digging coal on your land,' and she said, 'Oh no, you can't do that. I've been ranching here since 1903.' http://thetyee.ca/News/2007/03/30/RanchRevolt/ [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 2, 2007]

Note: http://thetyee.ca/News/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:31 pm
    In related news, only Oil companies in Alberta are allowed to have land agents, who work with farmers to negotiate surface rights for Oil Companies. In Alberta, only 10 land agents work for farmers, the rest are employed by Oil Comapnies. Raymond Strom was *convicted* of being a land agent without a license, and negotiating surface rights on behalf of farmers. Strangely, although I saw the news of his conviction on the 6 o'Clock edition, I can find no mention of it on the Web.<br />
    <br />
    Here's background:<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2007/01/08/farmers-decision.html">http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2007/01/08/farmers-decision.html</a><br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2007/01/05/farmers-landrights.html">http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2007/01/05/farmers-landrights.html</a><br />
    <p>---<br>The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.<br />

  2. Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:24 pm
    Myself and a neighbour own our mineral rights. The battle with the government is not over, however. There is several hectares around us that have no protection against the new law. Protection from the government is seemingly become the norm these days. Hopefully Campbell's own property will become one big pit.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  3. Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:30 am
    "And if someone else lays a claim to those rights, they can start drilling and digging on your property whether you want them to or not."

    Folks, this is what "gun control" is all about!

  4. Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:13 pm
    "And if someone else lays a claim to those rights, they can start drilling and digging on your property whether you want them to or not."

    The tax's I pay on the mineral rights, gives me first claim.
    They will probably attempt to just pay me back the tax's I paid on the mineral rights for the past several years. At present, the courts recognize that as an owner of Minerals under my feet, it is considered "real" property and a court order would be required take that property from me. The catch is, one portion of my land has an easement to a defunct railway. That railway now owned by Via, could extract coal and cut the timber for ties. However that same railway would have to actually run their railway this far. There is little likelyhood, simply because they do not have a right-of-way between here and where their rail line stops.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  5. Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:28 pm
    If they only have "subsurface rights", what right do they have to disturd the surface, or even trespass on it with any kind of equipment. I'm aware of the provisions of the "free miners act", but as far I can see it, it only applies to people walking on the land, and even staking, but not digging?

    Ed Deak.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news