Ochs was really talking about the small ‘L’ variety of liberals, and specifically the American subspecies, but the shoe certainly fits here in Canada with the big ‘L’ crowd. And we are presently witnessing the desperate attempt by these Liberals to purchase, with our money, the same social niceties they have stolen over the past ten years or so, also with our money.
The Liberals didn’t negotiate the disastrous NAFTA deal, but they did let it go ahead as planned in January 1994. They didn’t give us the GST, but they did fail to remove it as they had promised. They claim to have balanced Canada’s books for the past decade although accounting magic can make anything look balanced, or not, as political whims dictate.
But they have also overseen the continued degradation of those intangible and real things that make this country different from our friendly southern neighbour. Medicare is sick or dying, our military is a worldwide joke and our once proud history of peacekeeping is beyond our reach, our taxes go higher or lower for entirely political rather than financial reasons … in short, Canada is a mess.
The Liberals are certainly not to blame for this entirely because we have still the legacy of Brian Mulroney as a cross to bear. But in a decade they have only made things worse in Canada, not better.
Over the past month, Paul Martin has given additional proof to a theory I have held about him for some while. Think back to his nine years as Minister of Finance: every year, the picture got rosier and the deficit or surplus looked better and better. Every time he was discussing an upcoming budget he would make predictions of, say, a billion dollar surplus and then proudly announce later that performance was better than expected and the surplus was five billion. Every time.
There are those who say he was simply giving ‘conservative’ (small ‘C’) estimates but I have maintained that he simply can’t count.
Three weeks ago, in the wake of a horrible slide in voter appreciation for his party, he called an election he didn’t need to call. Again, I think, because he can’t count. And now we are witnessing the meltdown of the Liberal Party right before our eyes and the only regret that brings to my mind is the ascendancy of Stephen Harper and his band of no-goods.
While Harper’s Conservatives are asking Canadians to ‘demand better’ in the hope that voters will be fooled into believing that ‘better’ means Conservative, Martin is prancing around talking about a vision of Canada that he and his Liberals choose and, by gosh, he hopes you’ll choose it too. And he does this with the boldfaced arrogance of someone who thinks we’ll all be too stupid to notice that the vision he is espousing is a return to many of the things that he and the Liberals have been busy gutting for the past decade.
Paul Martin deserves to have his face slapped, figuratively and literally, and it is beginning to seem that the voters of Canada are in the right mood to do at least the figurative part. And it bloody serves him right! The problem is, his 10 years of stupidity in power and his present idiotic election call may very well result in putting Stephen Harper in the Prime Minister’s office. God help as all then.
It seems to me that Canadians are choosing the Conservatives for the wrong reason: they want to punish the Liberals. It’s a noble sentiment and one that I wholeheartedly endorse, but this is the classic ‘biting off your nose to spite your face’ syndrome.
The Liberals cannot be trusted, the Conservatives cannot be tolerated. And if either party is reaching voters with the few little tidbits of social programming they are promising, then voters should have enough sense to simply reject both parties and cast their votes for one of the two parties that truly are into social programming: the NDP, and the Greens. Either of them is a far better choice than Dumb and Dumber.
In my life, I have voted for almost every political party, even the fringe parties (and, God forgive me, the Progressive Conservatives once when I was very young and the candidate was impressive [mea culpa]) … all except the Liberals; I’ve never sunk that low.
Phil Ochs was right.
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
What a stupid article !!!!! This fool writes off the CPC just solely because he figures that the CPC will tinker with the social fabric of Canada. Stephen Harper has not lied to us and the CPC has to some degree moderated their social stance , although there should be some major differences between the 2 parties. What is it that this writer doesn't understand about small " c " conservatism ? It seems to me that this writer thinks that all Conservatives are destructive. It also seems to me that if we stopped spending all our time and resources on some of these useless social schemes and turned those resouces toward FIXING what is truly wrong with our country , we'd be much further ahead. Never mind the same-sex marriages , which is pretty sick anyway , but fix the military , the gun registry , the unbelievale waste of tax-payers dollars & fix medicare. Fix the highway system in this country which absolutely is in terrible repair. Let's have an actual democracy in this country for a change !!!!! Let the MPs vote what their constituents want them to , not along forced party lines. Stop the Judiciary from running this country & put the power back into Parliament & our elected representatives. You'll notice that I didn't say the PMO's office. Get rid of that useless body called the Senate or should I say the Pork Barrel and let's have 2 senators from each province ELECTED and give then some actual legislating power to counter-balance the huge advantage Ontario & Quebec have in this country. For once , let's have a government with some real guts that will stand up to the snivellers and do what's right. I believe that Stephen Harper is an honourable man & will make our country proud , something a lot us have not been for a long time. Canada used to be a proud country , now we're just a bunch of whiners , whining about our rights , about our willingness to kill our babies , about our right to smoke marijuana , about our right to marry someone of the same sex , about our right to stop someone from " hurting our feelings " and about our right to ignore our own personal accountability for our own actions. Wow , have we ever come a long way ( backwards , I think ). One day we're going to wake up & see that our courts have taken away all our rights except what they say we can have or not. That's government under the Liberals , the NDP or Green party.
Dennis
I am just wondering about which rights you are talking about that will be protected by the Conservatives, Dennis...
Given that over half of Canada's population is female, and about 10% (possibly higher) are homosexual, the Conservatives will be representing less than half of Canada... if we want to tack on low-income peoples, whose rights would be cut back along with the social spending, we are looking at 1/4 of Canada's children, not to mention their parents. And minority rights won't make it to the Con agenda, either... so what do we have left? Middle class and upper class white males. If that is the Canadian rights you are talking about, please specify next time.
As for those Canadians (white mid&up class), it is quite fine by me if they don't want to marry each other, kill babies or do drugs. They can hurt each other's feelings, shoot eachother with their guns, and not whine about it... just as long as they don't bring me into it by making that what all of Canada is about.
---
I try to take one day at a time, but sometimes several days attack me at once.
Amelia from Edmonton
"The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato
Good piece Paul, it is maddening to watch the mass media selling the "drift to the conservatives" story. They spend next to no time questioning Harper, it seems they know nothing about economics and have the attention spans to prove it. They never miss a chance to say that the NDP has no chance and that the NDP budget is there for comic relief, just in case we failed to miss the significance of the no chance remark. Let's show these pollsters that what happened in India can happen here too, lets have an NDP bushwack at the ballot box. The fact is that Canadians do not have to follow the expected course, we can change it, lets drop the Conservatives and the Liberals into the annals of past history.
Dennis
Wow, that's a pretty vituperous defense of Harper given that the thrust of the article was mainly criticism of Martin. Or did you miss the point?
Let me assure you that if I write an article about Harper I will be considerably more brutal than you seem to think I already was.
Paul Harris
"The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato
I'm sorry, but by saying homosexuality is wrong does make you intolerant and homophobic.
Thanks for the welcome!
---
I try to take one day at a time, but sometimes several days attack me at once.
Amelia from Edmonton
"The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato
Dennis
Dennis
How is lowering the age of majority equivalent to the intent to sexually molest anyone?
At any rate,Paul, I didn't miss the point. Martin's government is so corrupt and polluted that it really doesn't need comment. However, you had some rough comments on the CPC. And they haven't even had a chance to govern yet. This is not the same party as Brian Mulroney's corrupt reign.At least give them the opportunity to govern & see where they go before you rip them apart. How anyone in their right mind could vote for Martin after all the scandles is totally beyond me. If Martin forms the next government, I would have to say that the Canadian people don't care one way or the other how their tax dollars are spent. Pretty sad commentary on the state of Canadian politics.
Dennis
Dennis