Harper Backs Medicare Law

Posted on Monday, May 02 at 09:37 by 4Canada
Speaking at a luncheon hosted by the right-of-centre Fraser Institute, Harper said a plan to gut medicare, floated recently by former Reform party leader Preston Manning and former Ontario premier Mike Harris, was both naïve and misguided. Manning and Harris say the federal government should kill the Canada Health Act, the federal law governing medicare, and withdraw almost completely from the health field. "I could not imagine a proposal that's more of a non-starter than that one," Harper said yesterday. He acknowledged that free marketeers in the mainly business audience might not like his new position on health care, but said that political realism demanded it. "There is a consensus across Canadian society that those (free-market) norms should not dominate in the provision of health-care services." And, he said, Canadians support medicare because it works for them. "I will never compromise public health insurance in the country because it is the only system that most Canadian families, including my own family, have ever used." Reacting to those who say that medicare is a straitjacket, he said the Canada Health Act does not prevent the provinces from experimenting with innovative ways to provide health care. And he said that those, like Manning and Harris, who argue that the Canadian health-care system is uniquely hobbled by medicare are simply wrong. All nations suffer similar problems with their health-care systems, he said. Costs are up because populations are aging and because new medical technology is expensive. "Our health-care system is not unique in being under a great deal of stress." For Harper, yesterday's speech marks a new way-station in his journey away from hard-line, free-market neo-conservatism. In 1988, as chief policy architect for Manning's Reform party, he authored a document calling on Ottawa to withdraw from all universal social programs and leave them to the provinces. In 1993, as a Reform MP, he supported a caucus statement committing the party to "restore to the provinces the administrative jurisdiction (in health) that the federal government has usurped." In 2001, he co-authored an open letter to Alberta Premier Ralph Klein urging him to drop out of medicare. In a 2003 newspaper article, he wrote that the Canada Health Act should be scrapped and replaced with 10 separate agreements between Ottawa and each province. As late as last year, he wrote in the Star that one of his guiding principles in health care was that it must remain in provincial jurisdiction. And while he insisted during last year's election campaign that he was in favour of universal public health insurance, he carefully never mentioned the Canada Health Act. During that campaign it appeared for a while that Harper's Conservatives might win. Then, late in the campaign, Klein was quoted as saying he might introduce reforms that contravened the Canada Health Act. Prime Minister Paul Martin used Klein's words to portray Klein's fellow Conservative Harper as an enemy of medicare and won the election. For a year, Harper has tried to shake that image. Then, earlier this month, Manning and Harris published their scheme through the Fraser Institute. The Liberals jumped on it as further evidence that the Conservatives have a secret agenda to destroy medicare. Harper is said to have been furious. Yesterday, Harper was asked whether he was worried Klein might torpedo him again. The Alberta premier has promised to introduce unspecified health-care reforms soon, during what he calls his last term in office. "Mr. Klein isn't going to be premier much longer," Harper said. http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1114813812969&call_pageid=970599109774&col=Columnist969907626796

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue May 03, 2005 1:42 am
    I love this, '"I could not imagine a proposal that's more of a non-starter than that one," Harper said yesterday.' It's a non-starter, he didn't say he wouldn't finish us with it. As for Klein, well it is nice of Harper to let us know the inside scoop on Mr.Klein's career.

    I will be very surprised, if Harper doesn't win this election he is so eager for, that he won't resign. He doesn't like to lose, and being second best just seems to irk him, watching him after the last election I was sure he was going to resign.


    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  2. by avatar Spud
    Tue May 03, 2005 7:38 am
    Do you believe he will keep Medicare?
    I don`t.
    Like all politicians,say one thing,do another,and once in power they do what they want.

  3. Tue May 03, 2005 1:23 pm
    Oh, what the heck. Our country is already in the shi**er now, so why look to someone or something different? We like it that way. Baaaa, baaaa. Let's keep Martin with Jack Layton standing closely behind him with his hands in his pockets. That will take care of our needs in the future. Canada needs a strong Power Corporation. And the best way to invest in Canada is to invest in Paul Martin. After all, he along with Jack Layton have proven beyond a doubt that they will always put our interests first above their own. SO let's maintain the status quo, shall we? We're a wealthy nation after all, and we can afford them, right? It would be nice to have a choice other than Harper, but hey, we don't need one as we LOVE being sheeple!

    -------
    "they should hate us for our shoes, we should beat them with our money" - Anonymous Canadien

  4. by hoopoe
    Tue May 03, 2005 5:09 pm
    The location he is giving his speech at says everything; these are his buddies and he supports their slavish devotion to "free market" economics with their gross misunderstanding of Adam Smith's works. His conversion to unqualified support for any social program made with an imminent election call in the works is about as reliable him converting to Hinduism. As leader of the National Citizen's Coalition, Harper is on record for bragging about that organisation's success in weakening Canada's social programs.

    If four years ago he was against this then maybe he should be demanded to give an explanation for his sudden conversion. He stands in the House of Commons day and day out calling Martin's ethics into question but where are his ethics when he stands before the whole country and utters lies with as straight a face as the best of politicians.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news