Definition Of Nationalism

Posted on Monday, November 10 at 09:19 by sthompson
NATIONALISM (a definition)

Canada's nationalism is unique in the world. It is not xenophobic and does not require citizens to wave flags, get drunk at high-school and college football games, place our hands over our hearts, start wars, or engage in other jingoistic behaviours. Canadian nationalism has an exquisitely noble purpose: to keep Canadians from becoming citizens of the United States.

Thanks to Dooney’s Café of Toronto

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Nov 10, 2003 6:27 pm
    I have posted that definition at some discussion groups that I take part in. Lets just say that it has caused a mild stir.

    Among left leaning Canadians, it seems rather benign and close to reality. Among the neo-right it has caused ridicule and disgust. It seems a few cannot understand that many Canadians have no wish to be American.

    Thing is they will not advance their own description or definition - just ridicule for those that wish to keep Canada in the hands of Canadians. Some even went as far to cop-out with that lovely term - \'you are just anti-american\'! That about says it all does it not?

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  2. Mon Nov 10, 2003 6:53 pm
    Given recent US actions, being \'anti-american\' seems perfectly reasonable.

  3. Mon Nov 10, 2003 8:30 pm
    I agree that opposing U.S. foreign policy seems perfectly reasonable at this point, although as we've discussed on this site before, calling someone "anti-American" is generally more rhetoric than legitimate argument. <p> Definitely this site is not at all interested in being jingoistic, even though we could easily be considered nationalist--nor do we want to exclude people based on race or ethnicity, another danger of some kinds of nationalism. In our case, I'd also say nationalism was definitely a method of fighting U.S. imperialism--and the ineqalities of capitalist globalization as we currently know it as well, if not globalization itself (globalization from below, or internationalism as it's more often called, is fine by me). <p> What the Hellyer definition DOESN'T address is that popular nationalism or civic nationalism may be different from nationalism that supports a particular government and/or the elites of a country. See the article by Gordon Laxer, "<a href="http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/socweb/faculty/laxer/Darenot.htm">the Movement which Dare not Speak its Name</a>."

  4. Mon Nov 10, 2003 9:21 pm
    I agree with Hellyer, but it`s not just about resistance to US assimilation. It`s also about celebrating the contribution of Canada and Canadians to the world countless great things and ideas! It is about preserving our unique way of life on the North American continent! It`s about preserving a society that believes in rewarding an entrepreneurial endeavour, while ensuring that egalitarianism still exists to ensure that all Canadians have a fair shot in this lottery we call life! No, I can think of MANY great reasons to want to remain Canadian and preserve a country called Canada! There`s plenty to be proud of !!!

    ---
    Dave Ruston



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news